<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Presentations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/80741" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/80741</id>
<updated>2026-04-10T13:34:11Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-10T13:34:11Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Lean Aerospace Initiative (LAI) Supplier Networks Working Group, Proposed Lean Supply Chain Now Concept Demonstration Initiative</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146741" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirkor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Akhbari, Hamid</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Darden, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146741</id>
<updated>2022-12-06T03:43:16Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Aerospace Initiative (LAI) Supplier Networks Working Group, Proposed Lean Supply Chain Now Concept Demonstration Initiative
Bozdogan, Kirkor; Akhbari, Hamid; Darden, Chris
This presentation provides an overview of the proposed Lean Supply Chain Now concept demonstration initiative. The overall objective is to enable the development of lean, value-creating, U.S. aerospace supplier networks. The objective of this particular proposed initiative is to develop a validated deployment model for redesigning and streamlining vertical interfaces in the aerospace supplier base to achieve significant performance improvements (cost, quality, delivery).
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Modeling-enabled Design of Enterprise Transformation: Implications for Complex Enterprise Systems Architecting and Engineering</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146740" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirkor</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146740</id>
<updated>2022-12-06T03:22:06Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Modeling-enabled Design of Enterprise Transformation: Implications for Complex Enterprise Systems Architecting and Engineering
Bozdogan, Kirkor
This is a presentation given at the MITRE-MIT Enterprise Modeling Exchange Conference, MITRE Corp., McLean, VA, September 25-26, 2008. The presentation traces the causes of the failure of most enterprise transformation efforts, presents a new way of thinking about enterprise change and transformation, outlines a proposed conceptual framework for enterprise transformation by design, concentrating on the “fuzzy-front-end,” describes how enterprise modeling and simulation can help, and shows the links between modeling and specific change regimes, objectives, and change strategies. The presentation further maps model selection to enterprise state-space-contingent design targets and change strategies, by employing the concept of fitness landscapes from evolutionary biology. Finally, looking forward, the presentation defines complex enterprise systems science, architecting, and engineering as emerging new field of study requiring interdisciplinary research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Overview of LAI’s Suppliers Networks Transformation Toolset (Version 1.0)</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146739" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirkor</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/146739</id>
<updated>2022-12-06T03:50:12Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Overview of LAI’s Suppliers Networks Transformation Toolset (Version 1.0)
Bozdogan, Kirkor
This is a PowerPoint overview of LAI ‘s main supplier networks transformation toolset (Version 1.0) developed by LAI’s Supplier Networks Working Group. The toolset was finalized and issued in 2004, after an extensive alpha and beta testing process. It expands the earlier (1995) supplier networks framework. The toolset was “pulled” by a growing need expressed by the LAI consortium members for an integrated framework addressing the following types of questions: (a) what are the lean supply chain management concepts and practices; (b) how do we develop lean supplier networks; (c) how do we assess where we are in evolving lean supply chain management capabilities?  The toolset contains two major, integrated, components: Roadmap for Building Lean Supplier Networks (The Roadmap Tool), and Supplier Management Self-Assessment Tool. The Self-Assessment Tool has two versions: Version A is for the use of large system-integration enterprises as well as major suppliers. Version B, a condensed version of the main self-assessment tool, is developed for the use of smaller supplier organizations. An attachment to this PowerPoint overview document presents a listing of the pertinent LAI sponsored master’s and doctoral theses concentrating on various aspects of supply chain management, as well as pertinent LAI papers and publications, providing research support for the two components.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>System Perspective and Lean Coordination: The Case of Open Source Software</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84576" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Castro, Joao</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84576</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:42:15Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">System Perspective and Lean Coordination: The Case of Open Source Software
Castro, Joao
The Case of Open Source Software
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Metric Commonality</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84575" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Friedman, Alissa H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84575</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:20:02Z</updated>
<published>2010-10-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Metric Commonality
Friedman, Alissa H.
LAI Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-10-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84574" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Dr. Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84574</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:20:26Z</updated>
<published>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture
Glazner, Dr. Chris
LAI Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Increasing System Value through Flexibility</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84573" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McConnell, Joshua</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84573</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:35:54Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Increasing System Value through Flexibility
McConnell, Joshua
Webex Presentation for LAI
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Identifying Leverage Points in Defense System Acquisition</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84571" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wirthlin, Robb</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Dr. Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84571</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:34:51Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Identifying Leverage Points in Defense System Acquisition
Wirthlin, Robb; Rebentisch, Dr. Eric
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84569" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Dr. Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84569</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:20:25Z</updated>
<published>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture
Glazner, Dr. Chris
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84567" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Peck, Jordan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84567</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:39:01Z</updated>
<published>2011-06-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain
Peck, Jordan
Technology Management and Policy Graduate Consortium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Measure Commonality</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84566" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Friedman, Alissa H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84566</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:39:00Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Measure Commonality
Friedman, Alissa H.
PSM User's Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Systems Principles</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84565" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84565</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:34:54Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Systems Principles
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
International Engineering Systems Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Driving Open Innovation: Learning from Three Cases</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84563" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84563</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:42:14Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Driving Open Innovation: Learning from Three Cases
Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
PRI presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Architecting Lean Software Enterprises: The TODC Story</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84562" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84562</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:11:49Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Architecting Lean Software Enterprises: The TODC Story
Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
SMS presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Real Options “In” a Micro Air Vehicle System</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84561" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wilds, Jennifer M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bartolomei, Jason E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>de Neufville, Richard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84561</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:17Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Real Options “In” a Micro Air Vehicle System
Wilds, Jennifer M.; Bartolomei, Jason E.; de Neufville, Richard; Hastings, Daniel E.
The Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: Initial Results</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84559" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84559</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:11:49Z</updated>
<published>2007-03-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: Initial Results
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Rhodes, Donna H.
The Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-03-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84557" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84557</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:42:14Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm
Ross, Adam M.; Hastings, Daniel E.
Over the past five years, researchers working on a number of system design projects&#13;
in the Space Systems, Policy, and Architecture Research Consortium (SSPARC) at the&#13;
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed a process of value-focused, broad&#13;
tradespace exploration for the development of space systems. The broad tradespace framework&#13;
has provided insights into communicating and quantifying the impact of changing requirements,&#13;
uncertainty, and system properties such as flexibility and robustness. Additionally, insights have&#13;
been made in applications to more complex cases, such as analyzing policy effects on system&#13;
cost and performance, as well as understanding the time-dependent effects of architecture and&#13;
design choices for spiral development. The tradespace exploration paradigm both broadens the&#13;
perspective of designers in conceptual design to better understand the “physics” of the proposed&#13;
solutions relative to one another, and focuses the designer on delivering systems of value to key&#13;
system stakeholders.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Convergence of Expert Opinion via the Wideband Delphi Method: An Application in Cost Estimation Models</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84556" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84556</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:11:47Z</updated>
<published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Convergence of Expert Opinion via the Wideband Delphi Method: An Application in Cost Estimation Models
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper discusses the notion of collective intelligence through the application of the&#13;
Wideband Delphi method as a way to obtain convergence among a group of experts. The&#13;
specific application is the definition and calibration of cost estimation models that use data&#13;
collected from experts as part of their calibration. Convergence is important in this case because&#13;
companies need to commit to cost estimates early in the planning cycle since so many other&#13;
decisions are dependent on it. Our results demonstrate that, in most cases, convergence among&#13;
experts can be achieved after three rounds of the Wideband Delphi.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Human Element of Decision Making in Systems Engineers: A Focus on Optimism</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84553" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84553</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:35:34Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Human Element of Decision Making in Systems Engineers: A Focus on Optimism
Valerdi, Ricardo; Blackburn, Craig
Biases continue to be an important aspect of human judgment and decision making&#13;
because they can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Optimism bias is one type of bias that is often&#13;
overlooked because of its association with good health and positive outcomes. However, the&#13;
existence of optimism bias in human judgment can be very damaging especially when it distorts&#13;
a person’s view of future events.&#13;
In order to better understand optimism bias we explore the benefits and downsides of optimism&#13;
as well as some empirically-based origins of both optimism and pessimism. This provides a&#13;
backdrop for a methodology for quantifying optimism and pessimism using the Brier score&#13;
developed for calibrating weather reporters and a discussion about how sports bookies make&#13;
well-calibrated decisions. Results are explored from an optimism survey given to a cohort of&#13;
eighty systems engineers, which ultimately portray the degree to which optimism bias influences&#13;
decision making in large projects. Further exploration of the key differences in optimism across&#13;
professions helps distinguish motivational factors and characteristics of well-calibrated&#13;
professions. We also present results from a calibration exercise, designed to infer if such&#13;
activities can be adopted to assist systems engineering estimation. Finally, we provide&#13;
prescriptive advice on how individual decision makers can better manage their optimism and&#13;
become more realistic.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Culture of innovation Styles: Are our Corporate Cultures Tuned for Innovation?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84551" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Czaika, Ellen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84551</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:49:19Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Culture of innovation Styles: Are our Corporate Cultures Tuned for Innovation?
Czaika, Ellen; Valerdi, Ricardo
Systems engineering work is requiring increasing collaboration among various&#13;
enterperprises, nations, and individuals to innovate to meet the comlex needs of large numbers of&#13;
stakeholders. This indicates a need to better understand the cultural differences in innovation&#13;
styles that can enable or hinder collaboration. This paper argues that applying the Hofstede&#13;
Cross-Cultural Dimensions to enterprises will provide useful insights for systems engineering&#13;
enterprises in working with cross-cultural teams. Furthermore, this paper seeks to apply the&#13;
Hofstede dimensions to identifying enterprise cultures conducive to innovation, radical and&#13;
incremental. By exploring the relationship between the Hofstede Dimensions and Miller and&#13;
Friesen’s Conservative and Entreprenurial Innovation Models, and between the Hofstede&#13;
Dimensions and Brown’s System Model of Technological Innovation, this paper seeks to help&#13;
enterprises match their culture to the type of innovation their enterprise culture supports.&#13;
Furthermore, it suggests future research to investigate and compare the Hofstede dimensions of&#13;
defense organizations and of the companies listed on the BusinessWeek Most Innovative&#13;
Companies List.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Principles of Enterprise Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84550" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84550</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:31Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Principles of Enterprise Systems
Nightingale, Deborah
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) through its Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI) research team has been conducting research and facilitating enterprise-level transformations in large complex sociotechnical enterprises for over fifteen years. These enterprises have spanned a broad base of industries and governmental organizations including aerospace, automotive, electronics, health care, transportation, construction, defense acquisition and logistics, research labs and many others. What has emerged from both the action research in the field and its application in case studies in graduate courses is the concept of “overarching” enterprise principles and transformation methodologies that are independent of the industry or organization. A framework for transformation that consists of a set of interdependent methodologies, tools and enterprise principles that support holistic enterprise transformation is described and includes the following five elements: 1) Key Principles of Enterprise Thinking, 2) Enterprise Transformation Roadmap, 3) Lean Enterprise Self Assessment Tool (LESAT), 4) Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation (ESAT) and 5) Enterprise Architecting Framework. The application of this framework to the enterprise systems analysis and design of various industry and governmental organizations is discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84549" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84549</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:59:23Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Ricardo
Engineering cannot wait until all phenomena are explained. Engineers may work&#13;
effectively, often for centuries, with heuristics. This paper provides over thirty heuristics that&#13;
have been inspired by the development and application of a systems engineering cost&#13;
estimation model. The objective of this paper is to present such heuristics in a simple manner&#13;
so that they can benefit those that develop, calibrate, and use cost models.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84548" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84548</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:13Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research
Valerdi, Ricardo
An extensive amount of time and money is spent on developing methodologies and tools to improve the systems engineering process but much less is spent on addressing the organizational factors that can facilitate or hinder their adoption. This is partially due to engineering approach to problem solving which is technology centric. What is needed is an organization centric approach that complements the methods and tools being developed and considers the context in which they will be used.&#13;
This paper explores the notion of adoption of systems engineering research by focusing on a specific example involving measurement systems. Results from an industry survey on the most critical attributes for adoption are presented and implications of these results are discussed in terms of the broader issue of systems engineering research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Collaborative Systems Thinking Research: Exploring Systems Thinking within Teams</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84547" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lamb, Caroline T.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84547</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:38:59Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Collaborative Systems Thinking Research: Exploring Systems Thinking within Teams
Lamb, Caroline T.; Rhodes, Donna H.
This paper describes ongoing research that seeks to develop an empirical basis&#13;
for collaborative systems thinking, defined as “an emergent behavior of teams resulting&#13;
from the interactions of team members and utilizing a variety of thinking styles, design&#13;
processes, tools, and communication media to consider system attributes,&#13;
interrelationships, context and dynamics towards executing systems design”. This type&#13;
of thinking is critically important to addressing engineering systems challenges, and the&#13;
research seeks to inform and enable effective systems engineering practice in&#13;
contemporary engineering enterprises. Focusing on the aerospace domain, collaborative&#13;
systems thinking is examined through the alignment of enterprise culture and standard&#13;
technical processes. This paper draws on a variety of literature to compose a definition&#13;
of collaborative systems thinking and propose a research agenda going forward.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Measuring Systems Engineering Success: Insights from Baseball</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84544" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84544</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T03:13:02Z</updated>
<published>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Measuring Systems Engineering Success: Insights from Baseball
Blackburn, Craig; Valerdi, Ricardo
Optimizing the efficiency of socio-technical systems and determining accurate measurements of performance is a critical issue in many systems engineering enterprises. In our analysis we explore some of the recurring themes of Michael Lewis’s study of baseball, depicted in the best selling book Moneyball, and we make the connection to corresponding systems engineering principles of interest. The paper will focus on the systems engineering roadmap inspired by Lewis’ study for developing and refining a meaningful set of metrics for organizational transformation. The following steps are highlighted to convey this transformation with the assistance of metrics: identify and understand value in the enterprise and your organization; consider an integrated system focus in your organization; use cost analysis methods to implement a strategy for executing the transformation; and manage risk throughout operations and improve the process continuously.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Defining System Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84543" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84543</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:48:04Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Defining System Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value
Ross, Adam M.; Rhodes, Donna H.; Hastings, Daniel E.
Designing and maintaining systems in a dynamic contemporary environment requires&#13;
a rethinking of how systems provide value to stakeholders over time. Classically, two different&#13;
approaches to promoting value sustainment may include developing either alterable or robust&#13;
systems. The first accomplishes value delivery through altering the system to meet new needs,&#13;
while the second accomplishes value delivery through maintaining a system to meet needs in&#13;
spite of changes. The definitions of flexibility, adaptability, scalability, and robustness are shown&#13;
to be different parts of the core concept of “changeability,” which can be described by three&#13;
aspects: change agents, change effects, and change mechanisms. Cast in terms of system&#13;
parameter changes, flexibility and adaptability are shown to relate to the origin of the change&#13;
agent (external or internal to a system boundary respectively). Scalability and robustness, along&#13;
with the additional property of modifiability, are shown to relate to change effects. The extent of&#13;
changeability is determined by the number of possible change mechanisms available to the&#13;
system as accepted by decision makers. Creating changeable systems, which can incorporate&#13;
both classical notions of alterability and robustness, empowers systems to maintain value&#13;
delivery over their lifecycle, in spite of changes in their contexts, thereby achieving value&#13;
robustness to stakeholders over time.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using a Boundary Object Framework to Analyze Interorganizational Collaboration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84542" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fong, Allan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84542</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:39:00Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using a Boundary Object Framework to Analyze Interorganizational Collaboration
Fong, Allan; Valerdi, Ricardo; Srinivasan, Jayakanth
The U.S. military is facing a plethora of challenges as a result of tightening procurement&#13;
budgets and the need to acquire new capabilities to operate in modern war environments. This&#13;
requires integrating legacy systems with developing technologies in what is loosely defined to be&#13;
a System of Systems. Most Systems of Systems require some integrator to manage and operate&#13;
the system interfaces. In addition to technical integration challenges, these system integrators&#13;
have the difficult undertaking of integrating various organizations. The boundary object&#13;
framework proposed by this paper provides a tool for systems integrators working in System of&#13;
Systems or any type of complex system to identify and categorize communication, coordination,&#13;
and collaboration interfaces and address possible failures.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84541" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84541</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:30Z</updated>
<published>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration
Ross, Adam M.; Hastings, Daniel E.
A framework for assessing changeability in the context of dynamic Multi-Attribute&#13;
Tradespace Exploration (MATE) is proposed and applied to three aerospace systems. The&#13;
framework consists of two parts. First, changeability concepts such as flexibility, scalability,&#13;
and robustness are defined in a value-centric context. These system properties are shown to&#13;
relate “real-space to value-space” dynamic mappings to stakeholder-defined subjective&#13;
“acceptable cost” thresholds. Second, network analysis is applied to a series of temporally&#13;
linked tradespaces, allowing for the quantification of changeability as a decision metric for&#13;
comparison across system architecture and design options. The quantifiable is defined as the&#13;
filtered outdegree of each design node in a tradespace network formed by linking design&#13;
options through explicitly defined prospective transition paths. Each of the system&#13;
application studies are assessed in the two part framework and within each study,&#13;
observations are made regarding the changeability of various design options. The three&#13;
system applications include a hypothetical low Earth orbit satellite mission, a currently&#13;
deployed weapon system, and a proposed large astronomical on-orbit observatory.&#13;
Preliminary cross-application observations are made regarding the embedding of&#13;
changeability into the system architecture or design. Results suggest that the low Earth orbit&#13;
satellite mission can increase its changeability by having the ability to readily change its&#13;
orbit. The weapon system can increase its changeability by continuing to embrace&#13;
modularity, use of commercial off-the-shelf parts (COTS), and simple, excess capacity&#13;
interfaces. The large astronomical observatory can increase its potential changeability by&#13;
having the ability to reconfigure its physical payloads and reschedule its observing tasks.&#13;
The analysis approach introduced in this paper is shown to be a powerful concept for&#13;
focusing discussion, design, and assessment of the changeability of aerospace systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Screening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84540" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bartolomei, Jason E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>de Neufville, Richard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84540</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:13Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Screening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Development
Bartolomei, Jason E.; Hastings, Daniel E.; de Neufville, Richard; Rhodes, Donna H.
The goal of this research is to develop an analytical framework for screening for real options “in”&#13;
an engineering system. Real options is defined in the finance literature as the right, but not the&#13;
obligation, to take an action (e.g. deferring, expanding, contracting, or abandoning) at a&#13;
predetermined cost and for a predetermined time. These are called "real options" because they&#13;
pertain to physical or tangible assets, such as equipment, rather than financial instruments. Real&#13;
options improve a system’s capability of undergoing classes of changes with relative ease. This&#13;
property is often called “flexibility.” Recently, the DoD has emphasized the need to develop&#13;
flexible system in order to improve operational, technical, and programmatic effectiveness. The&#13;
aim of this research is to apply real options thinking to weapon acquisitions in order to promote&#13;
the ability of weapon system programs to deftly avoid downside consequences or exploit upside&#13;
opportunities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A First Course in Software Engineering for Aerospace Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84539" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lundqvist, Kristina</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84539</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:39:01Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A First Course in Software Engineering for Aerospace Engineers
Lundqvist, Kristina; Srinivasan, Jayakanth
Software is a critical component of mission capability in all aerospace systems. This&#13;
capability is realized directly through the use of onboard software, and enabled through the&#13;
use of software on ground support systems. Students attending an aerospace engineering&#13;
program come with a highly diversified background in software development ranging from&#13;
novice user to expert programmer. A first course in software development has to account for&#13;
the diversity, and as an outcome provide both a common vocabulary, as well as a common&#13;
baseline of skills. This paper presents our learning from designing and teaching such a&#13;
course for aerospace engineering undergraduates.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84537" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Dr. Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Prof. Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84537</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:59:23Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems
McManus, Dr. Hugh; Hastings, Prof. Daniel
A framework to aid in the understanding of uncertainties and techniques for mitigating and even taking positive advantage of them is presented. The framework is an attempt to clarify the wide range of uncertainties that affect complex systems, the risks (and opportunities) they create, the strategies system architects can use to mitigate (or take advantage) of them, and the resulting system attributes. Current and developing methods for dealing with uncertainties are projected onto the framework to understand their relative roles and interactions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Accelerating the Development of Senior Systems Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84536" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Davidz, Heidi L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84536</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:35:31Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Accelerating the Development of Senior Systems Engineers
Davidz, Heidi L.; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Rhodes, Donna H.
As more senior systems engineers are needed to handle the increasing complexity&#13;
of contemporary systems, there is an increasing need to accelerate the development of these&#13;
senior professionals. However, the process of efficiently developing a senior systems engineer is&#13;
not well-understood. To compact this problem, the skill set needed by senior systems engineers&#13;
continues to broaden as system complexity increases and as system boundaries expand. In order&#13;
to better understand the mechanisms that most effectively and efficiently develop these&#13;
individuals, this article discusses enablers, barriers, and precursors to this development process.&#13;
In addition to reviewing related literature, specific interventions currently used to accelerate&#13;
systems thinking development are discussed. Findings from ongoing research related to this&#13;
topic provide preliminary information about current understanding and practice. Better&#13;
understanding of systems thinking development provides a foundation for educational&#13;
interventions and employee development in systems thinking for engineering professionals&#13;
across industry, government, and academia.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integration of Space into LAI</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84502" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84502</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:06:54Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-13T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integration of Space into LAI
Warmkessel, Joyce M.
Space Sector Kick-off presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Space Initiative</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84501" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84501</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:15Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Space Initiative
Hastings, Daniel
A study of the benefits and character of a lean space initiative, complementary to the LAI,&#13;
was sponsored by the Air Force Space and Missile Center and Mantech last summer. This&#13;
nine month “Quick Look” identified potential stakeholders and surveyed them as to&#13;
perceived benefits, the priorities for research topics, willingness to participate, and&#13;
appropriate relationship to the LAI program. Since many of the principals are already&#13;
partners in LAI, there was clear indication that “lean space” could benefit by and add to the&#13;
data base for LAI and that it should be incorporated as a sector in the Phase two activity of&#13;
the latter. These results were briefed to General DeKok, commander of SMC, and his staff&#13;
on July 18, receiving strong endorsement and directions to proceed toward a start date of&#13;
September 1, 1997, with the need to take the necessary steps to coordinate with and obtain&#13;
LAI stakeholder approval.
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Lean Space Quick Look Study: Results</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84500" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84500</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:24Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Lean Space Quick Look Study: Results
Hastings, Daniel
Space Sector Kick-off presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Overview of Supplier Rating, Certification and Selection Systems in the Defense Aircraft Industry</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84498" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shapiro, Jeremy F.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84498</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:39Z</updated>
<published>1995-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Overview of Supplier Rating, Certification and Selection Systems in the Defense Aircraft Industry
Shapiro, Jeremy F.
In this paper, we report on the status of supplier rating, certification and&#13;
selection systems in the US Defense Aircraft Industry. Our findings result from a range&#13;
of information gathering activities over the past eighteen months including: Site visits to&#13;
companies; a one day review session at Lockheed Fort Worth Company on February 7,&#13;
1994 in which 10 companies made presentations of their systems; the study of&#13;
documents received from over a dozen companies pertaining to rating, certification and&#13;
selection systems; and, responses to the Survey of Supplier Systems and Relationships.&#13;
The purposes of this report are:&#13;
• To identify and review current practices with respect to supplier rating,&#13;
certification and selection systems based on our current state of knowledge;&#13;
• To discuss the extent to which these systems support the process of supplier&#13;
base optimization.
</summary>
<dc:date>1995-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>"Pie-Sharing" in Complex Collaboration Contexts</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84497" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Jap, Sandy D.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84497</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:52:53Z</updated>
<published>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">"Pie-Sharing" in Complex Collaboration Contexts
Jap, Sandy D.
Recently, there has been a growing interest in the development of collaborative&#13;
relationships between organizations. Much attention has been given to how organizations&#13;
‘expand the pie’ of benefits between them; however, there is little that addresses the ensuing&#13;
issue – how organizations divide the expanded pie. This research examines the relational impact&#13;
of pie sharing in complex collaboration contexts marked by uncertainty in resources and outputs,&#13;
information asymmetries, intangible aspects, and noncomparable factors and processes. A&#13;
conceptual framework is developed that examines how the use of equity and equality sharing&#13;
principles in conjunction with various resource and organizational conditions can be used to&#13;
systematically impact relational outcomes. Survey results of 300 R&amp;D managers, scientists, and&#13;
engineers indicate that sharing principles can have a positive or negative effect on the&#13;
relationship depending on the type of sharing principle used, and the characteristics of the&#13;
resources and organizations. In particular, sharing processes should be responsive to the goals of&#13;
the collaboration. The results underscore the strategic nature of the sharing phenomenon as well&#13;
as the importance of relational concerns in complex and uncertain interorganizational settings.
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Direct and Indirect Bargaining Costs and the Scope of the Firm</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84496" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Simester, Duncan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Knez, Marc</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84496</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T16:47:29Z</updated>
<published>2000-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Direct and Indirect Bargaining Costs and the Scope of the Firm
Simester, Duncan; Knez, Marc
Forthcoming publication in The Journal of Business
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Effect of Enterprise Design on Stakeholders and Value Creation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84494" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Matty, LTC Doug</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84494</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:06:31Z</updated>
<published>2011-02-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Effect of Enterprise Design on Stakeholders and Value Creation
Matty, LTC Doug
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-02-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Standardizing Product Development Processes</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84493" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84493</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:40Z</updated>
<published>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Standardizing Product Development Processes
Rupani, Sid
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Practical Look at Architecting an Enterprise for Value Delivery</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84492" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cropsey, Lt. Col. Luke</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84492</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:24Z</updated>
<published>2010-10-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Practical Look at Architecting an Enterprise for Value Delivery
Cropsey, Lt. Col. Luke
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-10-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing Stakeholder Salience Through the view of Lean Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84491" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sisto, Gwendolyn</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84491</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:40Z</updated>
<published>2010-09-09T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing Stakeholder Salience Through the view of Lean Enterprise Transformation
Sisto, Gwendolyn
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-09-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizational Assessment Processes for Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84490" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Abdimomunova, Leyla</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84490</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:25Z</updated>
<published>2010-12-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Organizational Assessment Processes for Enterprise Transformation
Abdimomunova, Leyla
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-12-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Metric Commonality</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84472" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Friedman, Alissa H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84472</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:53Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Metric Commonality
Friedman, Alissa H.
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>New Insights on Implementing Lean in Product Development Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84471" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hoppmann, Joern</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84471</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:53:50Z</updated>
<published>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">New Insights on Implementing Lean in Product Development Systems
Rebentisch, Eric; Hoppmann, Joern
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Identifying Leverage Points in Defense System Acquisition</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84470" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wirthlin, Robb</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84470</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:53:51Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Identifying Leverage Points in Defense System Acquisition
Wirthlin, Robb; Rebentisch, Eric
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Design, Evaluation, and Management of Flexible Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84469" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McConnell, Joshua</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84469</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:03:03Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Design, Evaluation, and Management of Flexible Systems
McConnell, Joshua
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Metrics for Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84468" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, 1LT Craig D.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84468</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:23:02Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Metrics for Enterprise Transformation
Blackburn, 1LT Craig D.
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84467" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Dr. Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84467</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T15:27:27Z</updated>
<published>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding Enterprise Behavior Using a Hybrid Simulation of Enterprise Architecture
Glazner, Dr. Chris
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Designing and Deploying Lean Healthcare Curriculum</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84466" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84466</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:54Z</updated>
<published>2011-04-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Designing and Deploying Lean Healthcare Curriculum
Murman, Earll M.
LAI Webinar Knowledge Exchange Event presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-04-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Measuring the Efficiency of Commonality Implementation: Application to Commercial Aircraft Cockpits</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84465" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bador, Damien P.M.D.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84465</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:15Z</updated>
<published>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Measuring the Efficiency of Commonality Implementation: Application to Commercial Aircraft Cockpits
Bador, Damien P.M.D.; Seering, Warren J.; Rebentisch, Eric S.
Increasing commonality across their models allows commercial aircraft manufacturers to reduce the&#13;
product development cycle time and tailor their models to their customers’ needs. The cockpit is an&#13;
area where commonality is thought to be particularly desirable, since it also simplifies the pilots&#13;
training process for the airline companies. However, no set of metrics is currently able to measure the&#13;
efficiency of commonality application at this level from a total lifecycle standpoint.&#13;
In this paper, we propose a set of metrics adapted to large commercial aircraft and taking into account&#13;
the main parts of the product lifecycle. The concept of lead time is central in our measurement of&#13;
commonality, as it strongly influences the value of the aircraft for all primary stakeholders. We&#13;
examine the extent to which these metrics are independent from aircraft particularities (such as&#13;
physical dimensions). We indicate their limitations and what additional research should be performed&#13;
to obtain a set of metrics able to measure the efficiency of commonality implementation for the whole&#13;
aircraft.&#13;
We use the example of two competing medium-haul aircraft families to test our set of metrics. We&#13;
evaluate the efficiency of commonality according to our metrics and we compare with field results&#13;
obtained from the manufacturers’ studies and from the results of interviews of airlines pilots. We&#13;
show how our set of metrics can help determining how to optimize the level of commonality for all&#13;
stakeholders.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Real Options “In” a Micro Air Vehicle System</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84464" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wilds, Jennifer M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>de Neufville, Richard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bartolomei, Jason E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84464</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:53Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Real Options “In” a Micro Air Vehicle System
Wilds, Jennifer M.; de Neufville, Richard; Bartolomei, Jason E.; Hastings, Daniel E.
International Conference On Engineering Design (ICED’07) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Constructivist Approach to Teaching Software Process</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84463" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lundqvist, Kristina</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84463</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:10:52Z</updated>
<published>2007-05-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Constructivist Approach to Teaching Software Process
Srinivasan, Jayakanth; Lundqvist, Kristina
29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’07) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-05-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Teaching Lean Thinking Principles Through Hands-on Simulations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84462" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Muman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84462</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T09:05:43Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Teaching Lean Thinking Principles Through Hands-on Simulations
McManus, Hugh L.; Rebentisch, Eric; Muman, Earll M.; Stanke, Alexis
The teaching of Lean Enterprise Thinking in the aerospace context requires that students understand a complex subject—aerospace enterprises and their transformation—in a deep and intuitive way. Without this context, the lessons of the LAI Lean Academy Course® will make little sense. A rich simulation of an enterprise with a structure and problems typical of the US aerospace industry is used as a teaching tool. The simulation allows students to understand Lean Thinking at an intuitive level, and practice lean tools in a realistic setting. The simulation enables a CDIO approach (in this case, Comprehend, Design, Implement and Operate), by having the students take two iterations through a CDIO process to transform the simulated enterprise from an inefficient legacy state to a high performance future state (x3 to x6 production using the same resources). The simulation and its teaching goals are described, with reference to the limited literature on simulations in education. The process used in the simulation is then described in a CDIO context. Finally, the success of the simulation is evaluated using limited quantitative and more extensive qualitative data. It is found that the simulation is a powerful learning tool and a key component of the LAI Lean Academy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Doing More with Less at Ariens: A Leadership and Transformation Case Study</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84461" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hartwell, Jennifer K.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84461</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:14:03Z</updated>
<published>2007-05-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Doing More with Less at Ariens: A Leadership and Transformation Case Study
Hartwell, Jennifer K.; Roth, George
This case study illustrates the challenges of organizational change and transformation.  The company studies, Ariens Company, used "lean" principles and methods in making these changes. As a manufacturer of snow and lawn equipment, the promises of lean manufacturing from the automotive industry were very appealing to Ariens' management. Indeed, the company faced a crisis in 1998 - overproduction had left it with excessive inventory, and its costs were too high to sell its products through retail channels. Distribution costs are most of the possible profit margins in selling through dealers. The company needed sweeping changes - a financial restructuring, change in its distribution system, reduction of inventory, new production methods, and lower cost and better quality products. The company as a whole, from senior leadership to shop floor workers, needed to work together to achieve these changes. The thinking, process and sequence of top, middle and front-line management changes, is the focus for this case study of lean transformation.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-05-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Systems Engineering Confronts Enterprise Change: Frameworks and Lessons from MITRE Projects</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84460" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carroll, John S.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84460</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T18:22:44Z</updated>
<published>2007-08-06T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Systems Engineering Confronts Enterprise Change: Frameworks and Lessons from MITRE Projects
Carroll, John S.; Roth, George
Our collaborative MIT/MITRE team has structured the research as a series of case studies.  Although we incorporate elements of grounded theory, there are several frameworks that we are actively using in the analysis of our case data (primarily interview-based).  In this paper, we will present these frameworks and propose them as a nascent theory of enterprise change.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-08-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration to Develop Value Robust Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84459" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Dr. Adam M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84459</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:53Z</updated>
<published>2007-05-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration to Develop Value Robust Systems
Ross, Dr. Adam M.
Sikorsky IEEE CT AES Lunch Seminar presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Standardized Process as a Tool for Higher Level Systems Thinking</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84458" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84458</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:52Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Standardized Process as a Tool for Higher Level Systems Thinking
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Rhodes, Donna H.
2007 INCOSE International Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: Initial Results</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84457" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84457</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:33:33Z</updated>
<published>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: Initial Results
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Rhodes, Donna H.
5th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Myth Buster: Do Engineers Trust Parametric Models Over Their Own Intuition?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84456" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84456</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:22Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-12T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Myth Buster: Do Engineers Trust Parametric Models Over Their Own Intuition?
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper explores the abilities of engineers to estimate everyday tasks and their reliance on&#13;
their own intuition when performing cost estimates. The approach to answering these questions&#13;
is similar to that of the popular television show MythBusters which aims to separate truth from&#13;
urban legend using controlled experiments. In MythBusters, methods for testing myths and&#13;
urban legends are usually planned and executed in a manner to produce the most visually&#13;
dramatic results possible, which generally involves explosions, fires, or vehicle crashes. While&#13;
the question of parametric models versus intuition is not as exciting, we provide an interesting&#13;
result that demonstrates the difference between what is real and what is fiction in the world of&#13;
cost estimation.&#13;
Two heuristics, representativeness and anchoring, are explored in two experiments involving&#13;
psychology students, engineering students, and engineering practitioners. The first experiment,&#13;
designed to determine if there is a difference in estimating ability in everyday quantities,&#13;
demonstrates that the three groups estimate with relatively equal accuracy. The results shed light&#13;
on the distribution of estimates and the process of subjective judgment. The second experiment,&#13;
designed to explore abilities for estimating the cost of software-intensive systems given&#13;
incomplete information, shows that predictions by engineering students and practitioners are&#13;
within 3-12% of each other. Results also show that engineers rely more on their intuition than on&#13;
parametric models to make decisions.&#13;
The value of this work is in helping better understand how software engineers make decisions&#13;
based on limited information. Implications for the development of software cost estimation&#13;
models are discussed in light of the findings from the two experiments.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Boundary Objects as a Framework to Understand the Role of Systems Integrators</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84455" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fong, Allan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84455</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:15Z</updated>
<published>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Boundary Objects as a Framework to Understand the Role of Systems Integrators
Fong, Allan; Valerdi, Ricardo; Srinivasan, Jayakanth
5th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using a Boundary Object Framework to Analyze Interorganizational Collaboration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84454" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fong, Allan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84454</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:52Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using a Boundary Object Framework to Analyze Interorganizational Collaboration
Fong, Allan; Valerdi, Ricardo; Srinivasan, Jayakanth
The U.S. military is facing a plethora of challenges as a result of tightening procurement&#13;
budgets and the need to acquire new capabilities to operate in modern war environments. This&#13;
requires integrating legacy systems with developing technologies in what is loosely defined to be&#13;
a System of Systems. Most Systems of Systems require some integrator to manage and operate&#13;
the system interfaces. In addition to technical integration challenges, these system integrators&#13;
have the difficult undertaking of integrating various organizations. The boundary object&#13;
framework proposed by this paper provides a tool for systems integrators working in System of&#13;
Systems or any type of complex system to identify and categorize communication, coordination,&#13;
and collaboration interfaces and address possible failures.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Challenges in the Development of Systems Engineering as a Profession</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84453" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dixit, Indrajeet</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84453</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:30Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Challenges in the Development of Systems Engineering as a Profession
Dixit, Indrajeet; Valerdi, Ricardo
2007 INCOSE International Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Research Agenda for Systems of Systems Architecting</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84452" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Axelband, Dr. Elliot</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84452</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:30:57Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Research Agenda for Systems of Systems Architecting
Axelband, Dr. Elliot; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
17th INCOSE Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reducing Risk and Uncertainty in COSYSMO Size and Cost Drivers: Some Techniques for Enhancing Accuracy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84451" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gaffney, John E., Jr.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84451</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:52Z</updated>
<published>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Reducing Risk and Uncertainty in COSYSMO Size and Cost Drivers: Some Techniques for Enhancing Accuracy
Valerdi, Ricardo; Gaffney, John E., Jr.
5th Conference on Systems Engineering Research presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-03-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Pioneers of Parametrics</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84450" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84450</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:23:02Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-12T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Pioneers of Parametrics
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper provides a historical account of the development of the field of&#13;
parametrics through information obtained during interviews of twelve pioneers of the&#13;
field. Cost model developers, users, and practitioners were interviewed with the intent to&#13;
capture their views on the impact between cost estimation research and practice. The&#13;
individuals interviewed represent a diverse range of perspectives including academia,&#13;
government, and industry. Each perspective sheds light on the areas in which the field of&#13;
parametrics has had an impact and which synergies have been influential in the&#13;
development of the field. The implications of the findings are discussed in light of the&#13;
future challenges for the field of parametrics.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cognitive Limits of Software Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84449" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84449</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:26Z</updated>
<published>2007-09-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cognitive Limits of Software Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper explores the cognitive limits of&#13;
estimation in the context of software cost estimation.&#13;
Two heuristics, representativeness and anchoring,&#13;
motivate two experiments involving psychology&#13;
students, engineering students, and engineering&#13;
practitioners. The first experiment, designed to&#13;
determine if there is a difference in estimating ability&#13;
in everyday quantities, demonstrates that the three&#13;
populations estimate with relatively equal accuracy.&#13;
The results shed light on the distribution of estimates&#13;
and the process of subjective judgment. The second&#13;
experiment, designed to explore abilities for estimating&#13;
the cost of software-intensive systems given incomplete&#13;
information, shows that predictions by engineering&#13;
students and practitioners are within 3-12% of each&#13;
other. The value of this work is in helping better&#13;
understand how software engineers make decisions&#13;
based on limited information. The manifestation of the&#13;
two heuristics is discussed together with the&#13;
implications for the development of software cost&#13;
estimation models in light of the findings from the two&#13;
experiments.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-09-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lessons Learned From Industrial Validation of COSYSMO</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84448" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Roedler, Garry</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wheaton, Marilee</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rieff, Dr. John</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wang, Dr. Gan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84448</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:51Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lessons Learned From Industrial Validation of COSYSMO
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo; Roedler, Garry; Wheaton, Marilee; Rieff, Dr. John; Wang, Dr. Gan
2007 INCOSE International Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Systems Engineering Cost Estimation for Space Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84447" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wheaton, Marilee J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Fortune, Jared</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84447</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:22Z</updated>
<published>2007-09-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Systems Engineering Cost Estimation for Space Systems
Valerdi, Ricardo; Wheaton, Marilee J.; Fortune, Jared
The applicability of COSYSMO, a systems engineering cost model, is explored in the&#13;
context of space systems through the analysis of two main assumptions. First, the WBS&#13;
elements of the model are mapped to a prototypical WBS for space systems. Second, the life&#13;
cycle phases assumed in the model are mapped to the phases outlined in the latest National&#13;
Security Space acquisition policy. Through the analysis of these assumptions, the&#13;
applicability of COSYSMO to space systems can be improved. Moreover, techniques for&#13;
performing partial estimation of systems engineering by systems engineering activity and life&#13;
cycle phase are provided to further the applicability of COSYSMO to space systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>From Research to Reality: Making COSYSMO a Trusted Estimation Tool in Your Organization</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84446" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Miller, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84446</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:41Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">From Research to Reality: Making COSYSMO a Trusted Estimation Tool in Your Organization
Valerdi, Ricardo; Miller, Chris
As the COSYSMO model transitions from the development phase into the&#13;
adoption phase, industry stakeholders are beginning to embrace the model and integrate it into&#13;
their existing measurement processes. To date, much of the guidance provided by the&#13;
COSYSMO development team has been focused on the usage of the model. In the adoption&#13;
phase, users need guidance on how to adopt the model as they work to convince management to&#13;
invest resources in competition with other process improvement initiatives.&#13;
This paper outlines a process which provides guidance on the piloting and institutionalization&#13;
of COSYSMO designed to help scope the effort needed for successful adoption and&#13;
implementation. The process has been developed as a result of interactions with over a dozen&#13;
organizations that have participated in the industry calibration of the model and have begun to&#13;
integrate the model into their internal processes. The knowledge obtained from working with&#13;
these organizations is reflected in this process.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Technology, Government, Business, and Universities: The Innovation Ecosystem</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84445" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tang, Victor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Osorio-Urzua, Carlos A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84445</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:33:32Z</updated>
<published>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Technology, Government, Business, and Universities: The Innovation Ecosystem
Tang, Victor; Osorio-Urzua, Carlos A.
The purpose of this presentation is to present an overview of the roles of the government, business enterprises,&#13;
and universities in the promotion and creation of innovation. Our approach is to present key concepts, principles,&#13;
methods, tools and use illustrative examples from research and executive practice. We begin by defining&#13;
“innovation”. We argue that innovation is both a process and an output. From a process perspective, innovation&#13;
is an emergent property of a complex social-technical system composed of government, business enterprises,&#13;
and universities. The behavior of this system is the result of policies engineered by the government. We illustrate&#13;
this point with examples of various macro economies, e.g. Chile. Using these examples we illustrate effective&#13;
government policies. Next we discuss innovation as an output from business enterprises. We focus on enterprise&#13;
level methods and tools for innovation. They are: business model transformation, business process reengineering,&#13;
inventive problem solving, analysis of customer requirements, technology roadmapping, and knowledge&#13;
management. Consistent with our practice, we illustrate the use of these methods and tools in detail. Next,&#13;
we touch on the role of universities. For universities to promote innovation, we identify six research paths, three&#13;
research strategies, and two goals. We cite a few examples from MIT. We present a key role of universities: to&#13;
create interpretation spaces for researchers, government, and business where new innovative knowledge and&#13;
ideas can be explored and generated in an environment of strong mutual trust. Innovation is impossible without&#13;
decisive executives who are committed to action. Therefore, we present a detailed discussion of a new prescriptive&#13;
approach that take a fresh look at decision-making for executives and policy makers. Finally, we distill from all&#13;
of the above a set of principles that help unlock innovation. Finally we distill from all of the above a set of principles&#13;
that help to unlock innovation.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Ex Ante Evaluation and Improvement of Forecasts</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84444" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tang, Victor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Otto, Kevin N.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren P.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84444</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:29Z</updated>
<published>2007-11-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Ex Ante Evaluation and Improvement of Forecasts
Tang, Victor; Otto, Kevin N.; Seering, Warren P.
The dominant approach reported in the literature is to evaluate forecasts after&#13;
the fact. We take a different approach, we present a way to evaluate and&#13;
Improve forecasts before the fact. We reconceptualize forecasts as thought&#13;
experiments grounded on mental models. We show the results of our process&#13;
which debiases and reduces the asymmetry of forecasters’ mental models.&#13;
We also reconceptualize forecasting as measurements with errors. And to&#13;
analyze and improve the entire forecasting process as a system, we use the&#13;
methods of Design of Experiments (DOE) and Gage R&amp;R from Measurement&#13;
System Analysis (MSA). We show the results of our analyses using two new&#13;
metrics, repeatability and reproducibility and discuss new opportunities for&#13;
research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Design of Experiments (DOE) for Decision Analysis</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84443" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tang, Victor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Otto, Kevin N.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren P.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84443</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:30Z</updated>
<published>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Design of Experiments (DOE) for Decision Analysis
Tang, Victor; Otto, Kevin N.; Seering, Warren P.
We take an engineering design approach to a problem of the artificial - corporate decision-analysis&#13;
under uncertainty. We use Design of Experiments (DOE) to understand the behaviour of systems&#13;
within which decisions are made and to estimate the consequences of alternative decisions. The&#13;
experiments are a systematically constructed class of gedanken (thought) experiments comparable to&#13;
“what if” studies, but organized to span the entire space of controllable and uncontrollable options. We&#13;
therefore develop a debiasing protocol to forecast and elicit data. We consider the composite&#13;
organization, their knowledge, data bases, formal and informal procedures as a measurement system.&#13;
We use Gage theory from Measurement System Analysis (MSA) to analyze the quality of the data, the&#13;
measurement system, and its results. We report on an in situ company experiment. Results support the&#13;
statistical validity and managerial efficacy of our method. Method-evaluation criteria also indicate the&#13;
validity of our method. Surprisingly, the experiments result in representations of near-decomposable&#13;
systems. This suggests that executives scale corporate problems for analyses and decision-making.&#13;
This work introduces DOE and MSA to the management sciences and shows how it can be effective to&#13;
executive decision making.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Solar Power Satellites: Historical Perspectives with a Look to the Future</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84442" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Laracy, Joseph R.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bador, Damien</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Adams, Danielle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Weigel, Annalisa</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Chambers, Richard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kwon, Daniel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Proudfoot, David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Qu, Shen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shoepe, Ted</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84442</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:51Z</updated>
<published>2007-09-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Solar Power Satellites: Historical Perspectives with a Look to the Future
Laracy, Joseph R.; Bador, Damien; Adams, Danielle; Weigel, Annalisa; Chambers, Richard; Kwon, Daniel; Proudfoot, David; Qu, Shen; Shoepe, Ted
Since the late 1960s, there has been interest in the United States, and later in other&#13;
nations, to capture solar energy in space and efficiently transmit it back to Earth. Starting&#13;
with his seminal paper in 1968, Dr. Peter Glaser began architecting a prototype system that&#13;
was further explored by the US Department of Energy in the Concept Development and&#13;
Evaluation Program. This initial study showed that the project was very ambitious and&#13;
fraught with technical, social, and economic uncertainties. Energy economics and the lack of&#13;
a reliable, high frequency space launch capability brought most research to a halt in the&#13;
1990s. This paper proposes a rational technical strategy to refocus Solar Power Satellite&#13;
(SPS) research. It suggests a 30 year timeline for program milestones and analyzes potential&#13;
technical performance. Real options analysis is used to manage uncertainty and permits the&#13;
exploration of possible futures that are dependent on launch costs and electricity market&#13;
prices. We propose that the U.S. can make progress toward implementing a small scale SPS&#13;
system within several decades if work is begun now on technology development and on&#13;
addressing societal concerns.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Active Learning Strategies for Teaching Lean Thinking</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84441" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Candido, Jacqueline P.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84441</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:41Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Active Learning Strategies for Teaching Lean Thinking
Candido, Jacqueline P.; Murman, Earll M.; McManus, Hugh
Active learning is a method of designing instruction so that classroom students are actively involved in learning concepts and content. Instead of casting students into the role of passive listener, active learning techniques strive to engage learners in reading, writing, discussing and doing things to connect the learners to the material. The Lean Aerospace Initiative sponsored the development of a foundational LAI Lean Academy® course about lean concepts. The class is targeted for an audience with little or no experience in lean concepts and it was designed with a learner-centered focus using active learning techniques. Several strategies used successfully in this class will be described in this paper, specifically: plant tours, the supply chain puzzle, mechanical assembly for lean engineering and interviews/out briefs. Results from student feedback indicate that class participants enjoy the active learning segments of the class much better than modules that are mostly lecture-based.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing Information Waste in Lean Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84440" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Graebsch, Martin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren P.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lindemann, Udo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84440</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:41Z</updated>
<published>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing Information Waste in Lean Product Development
Graebsch, Martin; Seering, Warren P.; Lindemann, Udo
Lean Product Development seeks to enhance the efficiency of product development projects by reducing and eliminating non-value-adding activities or waste, which can exist on every process level. The value stream through product development processes is a flow of information, and hence waste exists in interpersonal communication.&#13;
The study elaborates the hypothesis that most information transfers do not add value to the product. It was further theorized that different means of communication are better suited for different kinds of information, at least from the lean point of view.&#13;
In order to understand the occurrence and ramifications of waste in product development information flows, the information transferred between team members was analyzed in two student product development projects. With the help of a paper-based value stream map, frequencies of waste drivers in information, the share of waste in information transfers, the interdependencies of waste and means of communication, as well as timeliness of information transfers were analyzed.&#13;
The study’s results show that waste is omnipresent in product development information transfers, as only twelve percent of all information transfers contribute value to the product, and nearly half of the information transfers could have been omitted without a decrease in product value. Assuming that preparing, sending, receiving and retrieving information accounts for most of the time spent in product development processes, an enormous theoretical potential for efficiency enhancements could thus be identified.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-08-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Adaptable Enterprise Architecture and Long Term Value Added Partnerships in Healthcare</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84439" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Jorge, Oliviera</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84439</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:22:05Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Adaptable Enterprise Architecture and Long Term Value Added Partnerships in Healthcare
Jorge, Oliviera; Nightingale, Deborah
Healthcare expenditure has increasingly been growing as a percentage of the GDP of several developed nations and it is feared that it will soon become unbearable. Additionally hospitals are faced with an estimated nursing shortage and with an aging patient base that demands better quality at a lower cost. Furthermore, hospitals tie up a large percentage of their budgets in inventory and in the required labour to manage it. Moreover, future improvements will necessarily require a solution beyond statistically sound inventory policies and software packages. This paper adopts a holistic enterprise architecture approach encompassing technology, processes, strategy, and stakeholder values. The study included two hospitals leading the way in such architectures with a leading healthcare vendor in the USA market. The research methodology consisted of field observations, 47 interviews and data analysis of the visited hospitals. Research findings are presented and supported by graphical representations of soft data collected. Finally conclusions are provided and also include lessons learned on how to adapt enterprise architectures and align stakeholder incentives.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Network Centric Operations and the Brigade Unit of Action: A System Dynamics Perspective</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84438" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Minami, Major Nathan A.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Dr. Donna</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84438</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:22:04Z</updated>
<published>2007-07-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Network Centric Operations and the Brigade Unit of Action: A System Dynamics Perspective
Minami, Major Nathan A.; Rhodes, Dr. Donna
In the midst of fighting a global War on Terror, the U.S. Army is concurrently attempting to&#13;
transform to a more agile and deployable organization, which is centered largely on the&#13;
integration of new information technologies into its command posts. While most Army leaders&#13;
are reporting that many of these new information “tools” such as the Army Battle Command&#13;
System (ABCS) give them an unprecedented level of situational awareness and are beginning to&#13;
enable a new style of war labeled by some as Network Centric Warfare, other leaders are&#13;
reporting that the integration of this new digital technology comes with some unintended&#13;
consequences that in some cases actually slows and decreases the quality of information flow by&#13;
orders of magnitude. We studied the “Brigade Unit of Action” concept with specific emphasis&#13;
on the Brigade’s ability to disseminate and process information within and between command&#13;
posts, using System Dynamics as a modeling tool to help better understand the impact of various&#13;
policy decisions made by the U.S. Army. Our study concentrated on some of the possible&#13;
strengths and pitfalls of NCW theory, and led to the formulation of five heuristics that Army&#13;
leaders should consider when developing the future command and control architecture for the&#13;
Brigade Unit of Action.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-07-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Defining System Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84437" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84437</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:28:27Z</updated>
<published>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Defining System Changeability: Reconciling Flexibility, Adaptability, Scalability, and Robustness for Maintaining System Lifecycle Value
Ross, Adam M.; Rhodes, Donna H.; Hastings, Daniel E.
Designing and maintaining systems in a dynamic contemporary environment requires&#13;
a rethinking of how systems provide value to stakeholders over time. Classically, two different&#13;
approaches to promoting value sustainment may include developing either alterable or robust&#13;
systems. The first accomplishes value delivery through altering the system to meet new needs,&#13;
while the second accomplishes value delivery through maintaining a system to meet needs in&#13;
spite of changes. The definitions of flexibility, adaptability, scalability, and robustness are shown&#13;
to be different parts of the core concept of “changeability,” which can be described by three&#13;
aspects: change agents, change effects, and change mechanisms. Cast in terms of system&#13;
parameter changes, flexibility and adaptability are shown to relate to the origin of the change&#13;
agent (external or internal to a system boundary respectively). Scalability and robustness, along&#13;
with the additional property of modifiability, are shown to relate to change effects. The extent of&#13;
changeability is determined by the number of possible change mechanisms available to the&#13;
system as accepted by decision makers. Creating changeable systems, which can incorporate&#13;
both classical notions of alterability and robustness, empowers systems to maintain value&#13;
delivery over their lifecycle, in spite of changes in their contexts, thereby achieving value&#13;
robustness to stakeholders over time.
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-06-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Towards a Work Breakdown Structure for Net Centric System of Systems Engineering and Management</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84436" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wang, Dr. Gan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lane, Jo Ann</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Boehm, Dr. Barry</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84436</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:57Z</updated>
<published>2006-07-09T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Towards a Work Breakdown Structure for Net Centric System of Systems Engineering and Management
Wang, Dr. Gan; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo; Lane, Jo Ann; Boehm, Dr. Barry
As the system engineering industry sees an increasing focus on the lifecycle development, acquisition, and sustainment of net-centric Systems of Systems (SoS), organizations find that current processes and tools need to evolve to handle the increased scope, scale, and complexity of these efforts. One such tool, the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is important in planning, monitoring, and re-focusing of program activities as requirements and goals of the program evolve. This paper provides an overview of the limitations of current standard WBSs with respect to SoS efforts and presents a proposed WBS structure that more adequately reflects the evolving processes and cross-organizational complexities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-07-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Theory of Objective Sizing</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84435" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84435</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:12Z</updated>
<published>2006-05-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Theory of Objective Sizing
Valerdi, Ricardo
The process of building parametric models to estimate the cost of large scale complex&#13;
systems have recently uncovered unanticipated challenges. The most difficult of which&#13;
includes the ability to define the boundary of the system being estimated. This boundary&#13;
is an essential step towards determining the size of the system; a major input into&#13;
parametric models. In this paper, we build on a concept from psychology known as the&#13;
moon illusion to develop a theory of objective sizing. This theory has two main benefits:&#13;
it helps explain why stakeholders have different views of systems and it provides an&#13;
approach for how these differences can be reconciled. Ultimately it will help technical&#13;
communities arrive at a more objective way for measuring system size which will&#13;
ultimately improve the accuracy and influence of parametric models.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Extensions of COSYSMO to Represent Reuse</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84434" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gaffney, John</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Roedler, Garry</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rieff, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84434</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:12Z</updated>
<published>2006-11-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Extensions of COSYSMO to Represent Reuse
Valerdi, Ricardo; Gaffney, John; Roedler, Garry; Rieff, John
As the maturity of COSYSMO increases, users continue to identify areas in which the model can be&#13;
improved. Recent emphasis has been placed on the clarification of counting rules for the COSYSMO size&#13;
drivers. These drivers represent various attributes of the total size of the task of the systems engineering&#13;
effort estimated by COSYSMO; in terms of person months. The intent of these rules is to ensure consistent&#13;
interpretation and use of the size input parameters that include: requirements, interfaces, algorithms, and&#13;
operational scenarios. Experience in applying these rules has exposed a limitation of the current version of&#13;
the model; there was no way of including the affect of reusing system components in the calculation of&#13;
systems engineering effort.&#13;
This has resulted in inaccurate estimates of systems engineering effort for systems that incorporated&#13;
significant reuse, as in the case of programs with a high degree of COTS integration. As a result, a method&#13;
was needed to account for the fact that not all of the requirements that drive systems engineering effort are&#13;
new. Specifically, some of the requirements for a new system may be “reused” from a prior system.&#13;
Further, some of the new system’s requirements may be “modified” from a prior system. Moreover, the&#13;
evolution of system requirements over the system life cycle may result in “deleted” requirements from the&#13;
initial configuration baseline.&#13;
On the surface, the notion of reuse in COSYSMO may appear as a necessity-is-the-mother-of-invention&#13;
activity but in reality it was an inevitable feature. One reason is that most software cost estimation models&#13;
– especially COCOMO II – go into great detail in addressing aspects of software reuse. The other is that&#13;
reuse is more prevalent among defense contractors that aim for higher productivity gains as they avoid&#13;
pursuing designs from scratch.&#13;
For these reasons, this paper provides (1) an approach for handling reuse in systems engineering in terms of&#13;
the number of systems requirements in COSYSMO, (2) a discussion on the potential cost drivers that could&#13;
be influenced by reuse, and (3) strategies in which this approach can be extended to include the three other&#13;
size drivers in the model.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-11-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>On the Use of Architectural Products for Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84433" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Dixit, Indrajeet</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84433</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:30Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">On the Use of Architectural Products for Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Ricardo; Dixit, Indrajeet
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) provides a standard set of views that illustrate specific attributes of a system. These views give different levels of detail and purpose that allow engineers to express operational, system, technical, and architectural properties for specific purposes. The twenty six different views available can be useful and at the same time overwhelming to someone unfamiliar with the framework.&#13;
An increasing number of defense contractors are using DoDAF to characterize system attributes. These same contractors are responsible for providing cost estimates for the development and implementation of systems. This paper provides the link between these two areas by relating architectural views to system representation for cost estimation. There are several benefits to this link. First, the cost estimation community can benefit from a deeper understanding of the DoDAF and its objectives to improve the field of cost estimation through the development of models that better represent system architectures. Second, DoDAF can serve as a common language between customers and contractors by improving the representation of stakeholder needs and objectives. Third, the architecting community can benefit from the identification of subjective cost drivers currently not addressed in the DoDAF products.&#13;
In this spirit, this paper describes how DoDAF architecture frameworks can be used to determine functional system size for adequate estimating of systems engineering effort. This is illustrated through the use of the OilCo FastPass system defined in previous work. The utility of using the FastPass system is that it is well documented in journal articles and it is a system familiar to the general systems engineering audience.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Advancing an Ontology for Systems Engineering to Allow Consistent Measurement</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84432" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Honour, Eric C.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84432</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:12Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Advancing an Ontology for Systems Engineering to Allow Consistent Measurement
Honour, Eric C.; Valerdi, Ricardo
Past analysis has shown that there is a quantifiable correlation between the&#13;
amount, types and quality of systems engineering efforts used during a program and the success&#13;
of the program. For any given program, an amount, type and quality of systems engineering&#13;
effort can be selected from the quantified correlations. The optimal nature of these selections,&#13;
however, has not yet been explored. An ongoing project, Systems Engineering Return on&#13;
Investment (SE-ROI), aims to quantify the correlations by gathering data on current and&#13;
completed programs. It is the purpose of this paper to advance an ontology that can support&#13;
useful quantification of the desired correlations. This ontology is based on a review of current&#13;
systems engineering standards, historical systems engineering activities, and data gathered on the&#13;
COSYSMO and Value of Systems Engineering projects. In this paper, the ontology is further&#13;
explored to create broadly-based definitions of key terms such as "systems engineering effort,"&#13;
"amount of effort," "type of effort," "quality," "success," and "optimum." The SE-ROI project is&#13;
continuing to convert the ontology into a methodology for measuring Return on Investment.&#13;
This measurement will yield more specific relationships between systems engineering activities,&#13;
such as requirements management effort, and the cost/schedule compliance of the program.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Role of Software Readability on Software Development Cost</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84431" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Collar, Emilio, Jr.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84431</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:09:58Z</updated>
<published>2006-11-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Role of Software Readability on Software Development Cost
Collar, Emilio, Jr.; Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper explores the role of software readability on software development cost. We&#13;
argue that the up front cost of incorporating software readability pays off handsomely at&#13;
later stages in the life cycle, especially at the maintenance phase which is where most of&#13;
the life cycle cost of software is expended. Our analysis of different software&#13;
development activities shows that software readability has a global effect on software&#13;
development cost and is independent of software size (i.e., KSLOC). Moreover, we&#13;
explore the links between software readability and programming domain knowledge.&#13;
This paper is organized into the following three sections: overview of software&#13;
readability, how readability fits into the context of software cost estimation, and how&#13;
results can lead to the development of a new COCOMO cost driver focused on software&#13;
readability.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-11-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Screening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84190" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bartolomei, Jason E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>de Neufville, Richard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84190</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:47:44Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Screening for Real Options “In” an Engineering System: A Step Towards Flexible System Development
Bartolomei, Jason E.; Hastings, Daniel E.; de Neufville, Richard; Rhodes, Donna H.
The goal of this research is to develop an analytical framework for screening for real options “in” an&#13;
engineering system. Real options is defined in the finance literature as the right, but not the obligation, to&#13;
take an action (e.g. deferring, expanding, contracting, or abandoning) at a predetermined cost and for a&#13;
predetermined time. These are called "real options" because they pertain to physical or tangible assets,&#13;
such as equipment, rather than financial instruments. Real options improve a system’s capability of&#13;
undergoing classes of changes with relative ease. This property is often called “flexibility.” Recently, the&#13;
DoD has emphasized the need to develop flexible system in order to improve operational, technical, and&#13;
programmatic effectiveness. The aim of this research is to apply real options thinking to weapon&#13;
acquisitions in order to promote the ability of weapon system programs to deftly avoid downside&#13;
consequences or exploit upside opportunities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84189" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84189</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:56Z</updated>
<published>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing Changeability in Aerospace Systems Architecting and Design Using Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration
Ross, Adam M.; Hastings, Daniel E.
A framework for assessing changeability in the context of dynamic Multi-Attribute&#13;
Tradespace Exploration (MATE) is proposed and applied to three aerospace systems. The&#13;
framework consists of two parts. First, changeability concepts such as flexibility, scalability,&#13;
and robustness are defined in a value-centric context. These system properties are shown to&#13;
relate “real-space to value-space” dynamic mappings to stakeholder-defined subjective&#13;
“acceptable cost” thresholds. Second, network analysis is applied to a series of temporally&#13;
linked tradespaces, allowing for the quantification of changeability as a decision metric for&#13;
comparison across system architecture and design options. The quantifiable is defined as the&#13;
filtered outdegree of each design node in a tradespace network formed by linking design&#13;
options through explicitly defined prospective transition paths. Each of the system&#13;
application studies are assessed in the two part framework and within each study,&#13;
observations are made regarding the changeability of various design options. The three&#13;
system applications include a hypothetical low Earth orbit satellite mission, a currently&#13;
deployed weapon system, and a proposed large astronomical on-orbit observatory.&#13;
Preliminary cross-application observations are made regarding the embedding of&#13;
changeability into the system architecture or design. Results suggest that the low Earth orbit&#13;
satellite mission can increase its changeability by having the ability to readily change its&#13;
orbit. The weapon system can increase its changeability by continuing to embrace&#13;
modularity, use of commercial off-the-shelf parts (COTS), and simple, excess capacity&#13;
interfaces. The large astronomical observatory can increase its potential changeability by&#13;
having the ability to reconfigure its physical payloads and reschedule its observing tasks.&#13;
The analysis approach introduced in this paper is shown to be a powerful concept for&#13;
focusing discussion, design, and assessment of the changeability of aerospace systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Coupling Lean Thinking and Systems Thinking at the Enterprise Level</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84188" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84188</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:47:43Z</updated>
<published>2006-05-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Coupling Lean Thinking and Systems Thinking at the Enterprise Level
Nightingale, Deborah; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
15th Industrial Engineering Research Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-05-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Engineering: Doing the Right Thing Right</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84165" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Haggerty, Al</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84165</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:13Z</updated>
<published>2005-08-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Engineering: Doing the Right Thing Right
McManus, Hugh; Haggerty, Al; Murman, Earll
Lean techniques are having a major impact on aerospace manufacturing. However, the&#13;
cost and value of aerospace (and many other) products is determined primarily in product&#13;
development. Migrating lean to engineering processes is ongoing in the industry, and a&#13;
subject of study at the MIT Lean Aerospace Initiative. This paper summarizes findings to&#13;
date, with references to both research literature and successful implementation examples. To&#13;
implement lean engineering, a three-part approach is needed: Creating the right products,&#13;
with effective lifecycle and enterprise integration, using efficient engineering processes.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-08-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>IT Enabled Enterprise Transformation: Perspectives Using Product Data Management</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84164" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hines, Erisa K.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84164</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T02:20:25Z</updated>
<published>2005-08-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">IT Enabled Enterprise Transformation: Perspectives Using Product Data Management
Hines, Erisa K.; Srinivasan, Jayakanth
Implementing a new information technology (IT) system often requires an enterprise&#13;
to adopt many changes in order to exploit the full set of capabilities generated&#13;
by the new system. However, the new IT system itself can often act as a barrier&#13;
to change rather than as an enabler. The challenge in making sure that the new&#13;
IT system serves as an enabler, rather than a barrier, to change requires the concurrent&#13;
performance of three sets of activities with the aim of exploiting the synergies&#13;
among them: redesign processes, develop and implement the system&#13;
through a mix of internal talent and external suppliers, and involve the user community.&#13;
Product Data Management (PDM) technology represents a substantial&#13;
portion of the rather sizeable investment by industry in IT systems over the last&#13;
decade. The selection, development, and deployment of PDM solutions were studied&#13;
in the context of the aerospace industry, wherein data management (DM) is&#13;
critical due to high product complexity and long system life cycles. A study of&#13;
current PDM-related implementation experiences in nine different aerospace company&#13;
sites highlights the difficulty in reaching PDM technology's full potential to&#13;
deliver customer value. The timing of system implementation, the creation and&#13;
composition of the team, and a willingness to overcome organizational inertia are&#13;
the three most important factors in developing a solution that meets an organization’s&#13;
needs. All three factors and the interactions across them are highlighted in&#13;
the two case studies focusing on two companies designated as Aero Company and&#13;
Space Company, respectively.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-08-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value-Based System of System Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84163" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84163</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:56Z</updated>
<published>2005-09-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value-Based System of System Development
Rebentisch, Eric
AIAA Infotech Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84162" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84162</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:42Z</updated>
<published>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm
Ross, Adam M.; Hastings, Daniel E.
Over the past five years, researchers working on a number of system design projects&#13;
in the Space Systems, Policy, and Architecture Research Consortium (SSPARC) at the&#13;
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have developed a process of value-focused, broad&#13;
tradespace exploration for the development of space systems. The broad tradespace framework&#13;
has provided insights into communicating and quantifying the impact of changing requirements,&#13;
uncertainty, and system properties such as flexibility and robustness. Additionally, insights have&#13;
been made in applications to more complex cases, such as analyzing policy effects on system&#13;
cost and performance, as well as understanding the time-dependent effects of architecture and&#13;
design choices for spiral development. The tradespace exploration paradigm both broadens the&#13;
perspective of designers in conceptual design to better understand the “physics” of the proposed&#13;
solutions relative to one another, and focuses the designer on delivering systems of value to key&#13;
system stakeholders.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cost Metrics for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84161" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84161</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:36Z</updated>
<published>2005-09-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cost Metrics for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper aims to enhance the understanding of UAV cost metrics and their uses. The&#13;
paper is organized into three main areas: (1) overview of current approaches for aircraft, (2)&#13;
life cycle issues with UAV cost estimation, and (3) cost metrics and model approach as&#13;
applied to UAVs. As a result of this work we hope to provide a better understanding of the&#13;
cost factors influencing the recently publicized scrutiny of UAV cost overruns. More&#13;
importantly, we hope to begin the foundation for the development of Cost Estimating&#13;
Relationships (CERs) that can potentially lead to the development of a parametric cost&#13;
model for UAVs.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-09-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sea Level Requirements as Systems Engineering Size Metrics</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84160" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Raj, Jatin</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84160</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:16Z</updated>
<published>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Sea Level Requirements as Systems Engineering Size Metrics
Valerdi, Ricardo; Raj, Jatin
The Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model (COSYSMO) represents a&#13;
collaborative effort between industry, government, and academia to develop a general model to&#13;
estimate systems engineering effort. The model development process has benefited from a&#13;
diverse group of stakeholders that have contributed their domain expertise and historical project&#13;
data for the purpose of developing an industry calibration. But the use of multiple stakeholders&#13;
having diverse perspectives has introduced challenges for the developers of COSYSMO.&#13;
Among these challenges is ensuring that people have a consistent interpretation of the model’s&#13;
inputs. A consistent understanding of the inputs enables maximum benefits for its users and&#13;
contributes to the model’s predictive accuracy. The main premise of this paper is that the&#13;
reliability of these inputs can be significantly improved with the aide of a sizing framework&#13;
similar to one developed for writing software use cases. The focus of this paper is the first of&#13;
four COSYSMO size drivers, # of Systems Requirements, for which counting rules are provided.&#13;
In addition, two different experiments that used requirements as metrics are compared to&#13;
illustrate the benefits introduced by counting rules.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84159" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Dr. Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Prof. Daniel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84159</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:58:53Z</updated>
<published>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty and its Mitigation and Exploitation in Complex Systems
McManus, Dr. Hugh; Hastings, Prof. Daniel
A framework to aid in the understanding of uncertainties and techniques for mitigating and even taking positive advantage of them is presented. The framework is an attempt to clarify the wide range of uncertainties that affect complex systems, the risks (and opportunities) they create, the strategies system architects can use to mitigate (or take advantage) of them, and the resulting system attributes. Current and developing methods for dealing with uncertainties are projected onto the framework to understand their relative roles and interactions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Effect of Schedule Compression on Project Effort</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84158" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Yang, Ye</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Chen, Zhihao</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Boehm, Barry</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84158</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:17Z</updated>
<published>2005-06-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Effect of Schedule Compression on Project Effort
Yang, Ye; Chen, Zhihao; Valerdi, Ricardo; Boehm, Barry
Schedule pressure is often faced by project managers and software developers who want to quickly deploy&#13;
information systems. Typical strategies to compress project time scales might include adding more&#13;
staff/personnel, investing in development tools, improving hardware, or improving development methods. The&#13;
tradeoff between cost, schedule, and performance is one of the most important analyses performed during the&#13;
planning stages of software development projects. In order to adequately compare the effects of these three&#13;
constraints on the project it is essential to understand their individual influence on the project’s outcome.&#13;
In this paper, we present an investigation into the effect of schedule compression on software project&#13;
development effort and cost and show that people are generally optimistic when estimating the amount of&#13;
schedule compression. This paper is divided into three sections. First, we follow the Ideal Effort Multiplier&#13;
(IEM) analysis on the SCED cost driver of the COCOMO II model. Second, compare the real schedule&#13;
compression ratio exhibited by 161 industry projects and the ratio represented by the SCED cost driver.&#13;
Finally, based on the above analysis, a set of newly proposed SCED driver ratings for COCOMO II are&#13;
introduced which show an improvement of 6% in the model estimating accuracy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-06-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enabling Factors in Successful Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84157" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tang, Victor</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Liu, Bing</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kellam, Benjamin A.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Otto, Kevin N.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren P.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84157</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:57Z</updated>
<published>2005-08-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enabling Factors in Successful Product Development
Tang, Victor; Liu, Bing; Kellam, Benjamin A.; Otto, Kevin N.; Seering, Warren P.
The research literature and industry best-practices report a vast number of enabling factors&#13;
that contribute to successful product development (PD). Collectively this body of work also&#13;
establishes the causal linkages between these enabling factors and overall success in PD. But&#13;
what specific factors will produce what specific outcomes are vague and ambiguous. To address&#13;
this apparent void, we find distinct sets of PD enabling factors that are statistically accurate&#13;
predictors of the specific project outcomes of profit, market share, customer satisfaction,&#13;
organizational effectiveness, and product quality. We are also motivated to help organizations&#13;
improve their PD. To that end, we develop a diagnostic tool using the factors that predict our&#13;
five PD outcomes. The tool is used to pinpoint weaknesses and focus improvements to achieve&#13;
specific desired outcomes. Results of in situ testing of the tool are reported in this article. The&#13;
guiding principles of this work are specificity and actionability: specific enabling factors that&#13;
can produce specific results, and an actionable diagnostic-tool that practitioners can use to&#13;
improve the practice and results of their PD projects.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-08-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Synthesizing SoS Concepts for Use in Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84156" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lane, Jo Ann</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84156</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:00Z</updated>
<published>2005-10-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Synthesizing SoS Concepts for Use in Cost Estimation
Lane, Jo Ann; Valerdi, Ricardo
Today’s need for more complex, capable&#13;
systems in a short timeframe is leading many organizations&#13;
towards the integration of existing systems into networkcentric,&#13;
knowledge-based system-of-systems (SoS).&#13;
Software and system cost model tools to date have focused&#13;
on the software and system development activities of a&#13;
single system. When viewing the new SoS architectures,&#13;
one finds that the effort associated with the design and&#13;
integration of these SoSs is not handled well, if at all, in&#13;
current cost models. This paper includes (1) a comparison&#13;
of various SoS definitions and concepts with respect to cost&#13;
models, (2) a classification of these definitions in terms of&#13;
product, process, and personnel focus, and (3) the&#13;
definition of a set of discriminators for defining model&#13;
boundaries and potential drivers for an SoS cost estimation&#13;
model. Eleven SoS definitions are synthesized to provide&#13;
reasonable coverage for different properties of SoS and&#13;
illustrated in two examples.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-10-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Non-Intrusive System Level Fault-Tolerance</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84155" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lundqvist, Kristina</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gorelov, Sébastien</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84155</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:57Z</updated>
<published>2005-06-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Non-Intrusive System Level Fault-Tolerance
Lundqvist, Kristina; Srinivasan, Jayakanth; Gorelov, Sébastien
High-integrity embedded systems operate in multiple modes, in order&#13;
to ensure system availability in the face of faults. Unanticipated state-dependent&#13;
faults that remain in software after system design and development behave like&#13;
hardware transient faults: they appear, do the damage and disappear. The&#13;
conventional approach used for handling task overruns caused by transient&#13;
faults is to use a single recovery task that implements minimal functionality.&#13;
This approach provides limited availability and should be used as a last resort in&#13;
order to keep the system online. Traditional fault detection approaches are often&#13;
intrusive in that they consume processor resources in order to monitor system&#13;
behavior. This paper presents a novel approach for fault-monitoring by&#13;
leveraging the Ravenscar profile, model-checking and a system-on-chip&#13;
implementation of both the kernel and an execution time monitor. System fault-tolerance&#13;
is provided through a hierarchical set of operational modes that are&#13;
based on timing behavior violations of individual tasks within the application.&#13;
The approach is illustrated through a simple case study of a generic navigation&#13;
system.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-06-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Assessing the Challenges to a Geosynchronous Space Tug System</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84154" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Richards, Matthew G.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Springmann, Philip N.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>McVey, Michelle E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84154</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:17:56Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Assessing the Challenges to a Geosynchronous Space Tug System
Richards, Matthew G.; Springmann, Philip N.; McVey, Michelle E.
A space tug vehicle is designed to rendezvous and dock with a space object; make an assessment of its current position,&#13;
orientation, and operational status; and then either stabilize the object in its current orbit or move the object to a new&#13;
location with subsequent release. A subset of on-orbit servicing, space tug missions in the geosynchronous belt include&#13;
stationkeeping of satellites which have lost attitude control and repositioning of satellites. Repositioning of spacecraft&#13;
may be desirable as a means to rescue satellites launched into incorrect orbits, for the retirement of satellites into&#13;
“graveyard” orbits, and for on-demand maneuvers that support flexible mission requirements. This paper aims to unify&#13;
the political, legal, operational, and financial aspects of the space tug concept and highlight the challenges that stand in&#13;
the way of an operational space tug vehicle. U.S. Space Transportation Policy is reviewed, and a space tug operation is&#13;
recognized as an enabler of emerging national space transportation requirements. Customary international and United&#13;
States laws are explored as potential constraining forces on future tug missions. A concept of operations in&#13;
geosynchronous orbit, including parking orbit selection and approach strategies, is analyzed with emphasis placed on&#13;
safety and reliability. Potential financing models and the issue of insurance for space tugs are discussed and identified as&#13;
the principal challenges facing implementation of a space tug system. This paper offers a positive forecast for the future&#13;
of on-orbit servicing and endorses continued government support for proof-of-concept missions.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Accelerating the Development of Senior Systems Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84153" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Davidz, Heidi L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84153</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:18Z</updated>
<published>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Accelerating the Development of Senior Systems Engineers
Davidz, Heidi L.; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Rhodes, Donna H.
As more senior systems engineers are needed to handle the increasing complexity&#13;
of contemporary systems, there is an increasing need to accelerate the development of these&#13;
senior professionals. However, the process of efficiently developing a senior systems engineer is&#13;
not well-understood. To compact this problem, the skill set needed by senior systems engineers&#13;
continues to broaden as system complexity increases and as system boundaries expand. In order&#13;
to better understand the mechanisms that most effectively and efficiently develop these&#13;
individuals, this article discusses enablers, barriers, and precursors to this development process.&#13;
In addition to reviewing related literature, specific interventions currently used to accelerate&#13;
systems thinking development are discussed. Findings from ongoing research related to this&#13;
topic provide preliminary information about current understanding and practice. Better&#13;
understanding of systems thinking development provides a foundation for educational&#13;
interventions and employee development in systems thinking for engineering professionals&#13;
across industry, government, and academia.
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84152" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Diller, Nathan P.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84152</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design
Ross, Adam M.; Hastings, Daniel E.; Warmkessel, Joyce M.; Diller, Nathan P.
The inability to approach systematically the high level of ambiguity present in the early design phases of space&#13;
systems causes long, highly iterative, and costly design cycles. A process is introduced and described to capture&#13;
decision maker preferences and use them to generate and evaluate a multitude of space system designs, while&#13;
providing a common metric that can be easily communicated throughout the design enterprise. Communication&#13;
channeled through formal utility interviews and analysis enables engineers to better understand the key drivers&#13;
for the system and allows for a more thorough exploration of the design tradespace. Multi-attribute tradespace&#13;
exploration with concurrent design, a process incorporating decision theory into model- and simulation-based&#13;
design, has been applied to several space system projects at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Preliminary&#13;
results indicate that this process can improve the quality of communication to resolve more quickly project&#13;
ambiguity and to enable the engineer to discover better value designs for multiple stakeholders. The process is&#13;
also integrated into a concurrent design environment to facilitate the transfer of knowledge of important drivers&#13;
into higher fidelity design phases. Formal utility theory provides a mechanism to bridge the language barrier&#13;
between experts of different backgrounds and differing needs, for example, scientists, engineers, managers, etc.&#13;
Multi-attribute tradespace exploration with concurrent design couples decision makers more closely to the design&#13;
and, most important, maintains their presence between formal reviews.
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Stakeholder Value Analysis to Build Exploration Sustainability</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84151" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric S.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Crawley, Edward F.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Loureiro, Geilson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Dickmann, John Q.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Catanzaro, Sandro N.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84151</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Stakeholder Value Analysis to Build Exploration Sustainability
Rebentisch, Eric S.; Crawley, Edward F.; Loureiro, Geilson; Dickmann, John Q.; Catanzaro, Sandro N.
The sustainability of space exploration will depend in large part on its ability to&#13;
consistently and reliably deliver valued benefits to societal stakeholders over an extended&#13;
period. This on-going research studies the values of prospective stakeholders in the space&#13;
exploration enterprise—both in the near term and with a perspective extending over&#13;
decades. The immediate focus is human and robotic exploration of the Earth/Moon system,&#13;
but extends to the exploration of Mars as well. Potential beneficiaries of space exploration&#13;
are identified in broad societal sectors. An analysis of these stakeholders, their values and&#13;
needs leads to the development of a comprehensive set of space exploration objectives that&#13;
address those needs. The relative priority of exploration objectives is weighted using&#13;
information about stakeholder characteristics, values, and their role and place in the&#13;
exploration value stream. The weighted exploration objectives can then be used to assess the&#13;
relative value of different technical system architectures, and to design exploration&#13;
enterprise architecture, attributes and policy frameworks to enable value delivery to societal&#13;
stakeholders. Ultimately, through stakeholders’ continuing support, sustainable space&#13;
exploration will be delivered.
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Next Generation Launch Capacity Model for the U.S. Eastern Range</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84150" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Steare, David H.W.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84150</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:03Z</updated>
<published>2000-05-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Next Generation Launch Capacity Model for the U.S. Eastern Range
Steare, David H.W.
2nd NRO/AIAA Workshop on Space Launch Integration presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cross-Industry Characterization of Spacecraft Integration and Test Discrepancies: Transforming Discrepancies into Product Development Improvements</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84149" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Weigel, Annalisa L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84149</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:59:45Z</updated>
<published>2000-09-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cross-Industry Characterization of Spacecraft Integration and Test Discrepancies: Transforming Discrepancies into Product Development Improvements
Weigel, Annalisa L.; Warmkessel, Joyce M.
This paper presents the results of cross-sector benchmarking research on discrepancies encountered during spacecraft system-level integration and test. Analysis results demonstrate which subsystems have the highest occurrence of discrepancies, which integration and test environments precipitate the greatest number of discrepancies, and what the leading causes are of discrepancies. In addition, the paper presents cost data for spacecraft discrepancies, and concludes with a discussion of important factors to consider in evaluating the cost-benefit trade of upstream preventative investment to avoid problems before they occur versus downstream reactive measures after problems occur.
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-09-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Tube Production and Assembly Systems: The Impact of Compliance and Variability on Yield</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84148" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wei, Yu-Feng</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Thornton, Anna C.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84148</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:24:51Z</updated>
<published>2000-09-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Tube Production and Assembly Systems: The Impact of Compliance and Variability on Yield
Wei, Yu-Feng; Thornton, Anna C.
Variation modeling is used in design to predict and&#13;
diagnose potential quality problems. Most variation modeling&#13;
assumes the parts are rigidly assembled. However, in some&#13;
cases, this assumption is invalid. For example, when hydraulic&#13;
tubes are assembled into aircraft structures, the compliance of&#13;
the tube facilitates assembly. If the tubes were rigid, they&#13;
cannot be assembled, i.e., the variations of the tubes and&#13;
structures are too great. Despite the importance of compliance&#13;
in assembly, it is typically not explicitly modeled during&#13;
design. This paper proposes a new method to directly predict&#13;
the assemblability of any tube design with minimal dependence&#13;
CAD/FEM modeling and simulation. The model includes a&#13;
variation model for the tubes and aircraft, compliance model&#13;
and assembly model. It can be used during design to improve&#13;
yields.
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-09-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Framework for Achieving Lifecycle Value in Aerospace Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84147" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84147</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:22Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Framework for Achieving Lifecycle Value in Aerospace Product Development
Stanke, Alexis; Murman, Earll
Creation of lifecycle value - a balance of&#13;
performance with cost and other attributes -&#13;
represents a challenge for the development of&#13;
aerospace products in the twenty-first century. This&#13;
paper examines the concept of lifecycle value that&#13;
stems from existing approaches of value&#13;
management and analysis, lifecycle costing, and&#13;
systems engineering. To ascertain common&#13;
characteristics of lifecycle value creation, case&#13;
studies were done for four aircraft programs: F/A-&#13;
18E/F, JAS 39 Gripen, F-16C/D, and B-777. A&#13;
lifecycle value creation framework is introduced,&#13;
comprised of three phases: value identification,&#13;
value proposition, value delivery. Based upon&#13;
observed practices in the four case studies, six value&#13;
creation attributes were identified. Capability&#13;
maturity models for the six attributes and three value&#13;
creation phases are presented. The resulting&#13;
framework represents a starting point for programs&#13;
seeking to create lifecycle value for aerospace&#13;
products.
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84146" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Millard, Richard L.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84146</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:22Z</updated>
<published>2002-09-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for Product Development
McManus, Hugh L.; Millard, Richard L.
This paper explores the concept of Value&#13;
Stream Analysis and Mapping (VSA/M) as&#13;
applied to Product Development (PD) efforts.&#13;
Value Stream Analysis and Mapping is a&#13;
method of business process improvement. The&#13;
application of VSA/M began in the&#13;
manufacturing community. PD efforts provide&#13;
a different setting for the use of VSA/M. Site&#13;
visits were made to nine major U.S. aerospace&#13;
organizations. Interviews, discussions, and&#13;
participatory events were used to gather data&#13;
on (1) the sophistication of the tools used in PD&#13;
process improvement efforts, (2) the lean&#13;
context of the use of the tools, and (3) success&#13;
of the efforts.&#13;
It was found that all three factors were&#13;
strongly correlated, suggesting success depends&#13;
on both good tools and lean context. Finally, a&#13;
general VSA/M method for PD activities is&#13;
proposed. The method uses modified process&#13;
mapping tools to analyze and improve process.
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-09-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Introduction to LAI</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84145" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84145</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:03Z</updated>
<published>2001-09-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Introduction to LAI
Murman, Earll M.
Introduction to LAI (delivered at AEDC) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-09-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Process Capability Database Usage In Industry: Myth vs. Reality</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84144" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tata, Melissa M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Thornton, Anna C.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84144</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:02Z</updated>
<published>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Process Capability Database Usage In Industry: Myth vs. Reality
Tata, Melissa M.; Thornton, Anna C.
Process capability data (PCD) is needed for robust design, optimal tolerance allocation, and variation&#13;
simulation analysis. Process capability databases (PCDBs) have been developed in many industries and are&#13;
being used by the manufacturing community to monitor quality; however, they are not being effectively&#13;
utilized by design. When the PCDBs1 were developed, the intent was for design to use PCD for&#13;
optimization and product cost minimization, but this ideal situation has not been realized.&#13;
A survey of a variety of design and manufacturing companies was circulated to determine both the state-ofthe-&#13;
art in PCDBs and the barriers preventing design from fully utilizing PCD. Two key barriers were&#13;
identified for internal PCDBs: lack of a company-wide vision for PCD usage and poor communication&#13;
between manufacturing and design. Supplier PCDBs have the additional barriers of lack of trust between&#13;
suppliers and customers and time lag for data entry. Management support, training, database population,&#13;
and common systems were identified as potential solutions to the identified barriers.
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Use of Dependency Structure Matrices for Product Development Cycle Time Reduction</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84143" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84143</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:22Z</updated>
<published>1998-07-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Use of Dependency Structure Matrices for Product Development Cycle Time Reduction
Browning, Tyson R.
Cycle time reduction is an important aspect of integrated product and process development (IPPD). This paper outlines some of the challenges that impede efforts to reduce cycle time for complex system development projects. Several facets of these challenges can be summarized using the general concept of design iterations. After reviewing this concept, the paper provides an overview of a process modeling approach utilizing dependency structure matrices (DSMs - also known as design structure matrices). DSMs allow a simple, visual representation of processes and highlight potential iterations. The paper concludes with a discussion of the ways DSM-based methods help manage some of the cycle time reduction challenges.
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sources of Schedule Risk in Complex System Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84142" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84142</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:19:13Z</updated>
<published>1998-07-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Sources of Schedule Risk in Complex System Development
Browning, Tyson R.
From one perspective, developing complex systems is an exercise in uncertainty reduction and risk management. In this article I first organize the principle sources of risk in product development into five categories: market risk, product performance risk, technology risk, development cost risk, and schedule risk. Second, I synthesize research findings from literature and interviews with experienced product development managers and system engineers at a major aerospace company regarding the sources of uncertainty underlying one of these categories, schedule risk. Relationships between these sources of schedule uncertainty are shown using a causal framework. The goal of this preliminary work is to highlight areas for increased attention in planning and management processes, while providing a systems view of the effects of certain actions.
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Exploring Integrative Mechanisms with a View Towards Design for Integration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84141" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84141</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:19:13Z</updated>
<published>1997-08-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Exploring Integrative Mechanisms with a View Towards Design for Integration
Browning, Tyson R.
The integrated product development (IPD) paradigm has&#13;
gained recognition as a preferred approach to product&#13;
development. In complex system development programs, the&#13;
concurrent engineering aspect of IPD is often approached&#13;
through the use of integrated product teams (IPTs), each&#13;
assigned to develop various components of the overall system.&#13;
Many have struggled to determine the characteristics of highly&#13;
effective IPTs and the circumstances in which particular&#13;
perspectives should be incorporated within an IPT. However,&#13;
much less research has addressed the nature and management of&#13;
the relationships between IPTs—the integration of IPTs within&#13;
a program. While many have lamented that coordination&#13;
problems have played a large part in diminishing the&#13;
performance of their overall programs, a systematic approach&#13;
for considering these issues a priori in program design is&#13;
lacking. This paper presupposes a familiarity with interteam&#13;
integration issues and (1) describes a framework for thinking&#13;
about organization integration within a program, (2) presents&#13;
integrative mechanisms (IMs) useful for managing IPT&#13;
interfaces, and (3) begins to develop a systematic approach for&#13;
designing programs that explicitly considers integration&#13;
needs, design for integration (DFI).
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-08-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Mechanisms for Interteam Integration: Findings from Five Case Studies</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84140" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84140</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:39Z</updated>
<published>1997-08-03T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Mechanisms for Interteam Integration: Findings from Five Case Studies
Browning, Tyson R.
Many product development programs consist&#13;
of multiple integrated product teams (IPTs)&#13;
and functional groups. Interteam information&#13;
dependencies greatly affect program success.&#13;
Program integration has thus become an issue&#13;
of increasing interest. This paper&#13;
summarizes findings from five case studies&#13;
of integrative mechanisms (IMs) in complex&#13;
system product development projects at&#13;
Chrysler, General Electric Aircraft Engines,&#13;
McDonnell Douglas, Sundstrand, and Texas&#13;
Instruments. Two types of IMs are&#13;
investigated in this paper: (1) Systems&#13;
engineering and interface optimization and (2)&#13;
Improved information and communication&#13;
technologies. As the appropriateness of a&#13;
given IM varies as a function of many&#13;
parameters—such as program stage, size,&#13;
complexity, risk, etc.—the goal of this&#13;
research was not to formulate a universal&#13;
template for IM application. Rather, it is&#13;
hoped that the lessons learned by these five&#13;
programs will help others determine the&#13;
appropriateness of particular IMs in their&#13;
situations. Also, the continued development&#13;
of an IM categorization scheme will hopefully&#13;
prove useful to those developing an&#13;
integration “tool kit.”
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-08-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Multi-team Integration: Interdependence and Integrative Mechanisms</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84139" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84139</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:02Z</updated>
<published>1996-07-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Multi-team Integration: Interdependence and Integrative Mechanisms
Browning, Tyson R.
The drive towards Integrated Product&#13;
Development (IPD) includes an impetus to organize&#13;
around Integrated Product Teams (IPTs). The use of&#13;
IPTs has brought with it many issues, including those&#13;
at the IPT interfaces. Program integration (crossfunctional,&#13;
upstream/downstream, customer and&#13;
supplier) can exist at several levels, within IPTs and&#13;
between IPTs. This paper focuses on the realm of IPT&#13;
interdependence and categorizes several Integrative&#13;
Mechanisms (IMs) to facilitate interteam integration.&#13;
IMs are strategies and tools for effectively coordinating&#13;
actions across IPTs within a program. This paper is&#13;
based on studies in the aerospace industry, but the&#13;
implications extend to any large, complex development&#13;
program.
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Methods of Integrating Design and Cost Information to Achieve Enhanced Manufacturing Cost/Performance Trade-offs</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84138" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hoult, David P.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Meador, C. Lawrence</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84138</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:39Z</updated>
<published>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Methods of Integrating Design and Cost Information to Achieve Enhanced Manufacturing Cost/Performance Trade-offs
Hoult, David P.; Meador, C. Lawrence
In this paper we address problems which&#13;
arise when large organizations attempt a tight&#13;
integration of design and cost while developing&#13;
complex products. Topics include the sources of cost&#13;
and design data, the arrangement of the databases, and&#13;
the interfaces required. We also discuss the&#13;
management methods required to develop and&#13;
implement Design/Cost Database Commonality.
</summary>
<dc:date>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Empirical Research on Systems Thinking and Practice in the Engineering Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84137" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lamb, Caroline T.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84137</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:38Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Empirical Research on Systems Thinking and Practice in the Engineering Enterprise
Rhodes, Donna H.; Lamb, Caroline T.; Nightingale, Deborah J.
The paper discusses recent and ongoing research on&#13;
engineering systems thinking and practices within the Engineering&#13;
Systems Division at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. . The&#13;
research seeks to impact the effectiveness of systems engineering in&#13;
modern enterprises through development of new empirical-based&#13;
knowledge related to systems thinking and practice in engineering.&#13;
The paper will discuss research progress and outcomes to date as&#13;
they apply to improving the effectiveness of systems engineering&#13;
practice and competency development in industry, government and&#13;
academia. The research involves highly collaborative engagement,&#13;
use of grounded theory methods, and both quantitative and&#13;
qualitative analysis. The challenges and lessons learned in&#13;
performing research of this nature and applying non-traditional&#13;
methods in systems engineering research are discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Systems Thinking as an Emergent Team Property: Ongoing Research into the Enablers and Barriers to Team-level Systems Thinking</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84136" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84136</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:22Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Systems Thinking as an Emergent Team Property: Ongoing Research into the Enablers and Barriers to Team-level Systems Thinking
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Rhodes, Donna H.
This paper describes ongoing research exploring systems&#13;
thinking at the team level. Termed collaborative systems thinking by&#13;
the authors, the concept of higher level systems thinking is&#13;
envisioned as a means both to build workforce competency and to&#13;
explicitly deal with system complexity at a higher level within an&#13;
organization. This paper introduces the key research questions, an&#13;
initial definition of collaborative systems thinking, demographic and&#13;
technical motivators, and summarizes the research progress to date&#13;
and plan for completion. The results of this research will inform&#13;
the design of technical processes and provide empirical knowledge&#13;
to support workforce development interventions aimed at developing&#13;
systems thinking within engineering teams. The role of&#13;
organizational culture is also considered as a factor in enabling&#13;
collaborative systems thinking.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprises as Systems: Context, Boundaries, &amp; Practical Implications</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84135" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84135</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:00:12Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprises as Systems: Context, Boundaries, &amp; Practical Implications
Valerdi, Ricardo; Nightingale, Deborah; Blackburn, Craig
6th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Risk in Acquisition: Initial Findings and Implications</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84134" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wirthlin, Major Robb</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84134</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:38Z</updated>
<published>2008-02-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Risk in Acquisition: Initial Findings and Implications
Wirthlin, Major Robb
Seventh National Symposium on Space Systems Engineering &amp; Risk Management presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Collaborative Systems Thinking: Towards an Understanding of Team-level Systems Thinking</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84133" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84133</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:00:11Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Collaborative Systems Thinking: Towards an Understanding of Team-level Systems Thinking
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Rhodes, Donna H.
As the engineering workforce ages, skills with long development periods are lost with&#13;
retiring individuals faster than are younger engineers developing the skills. Systems thinking is&#13;
one such skill. Recent research, (Davidz 2006), has shown the importance of experiential&#13;
learning in systems thinking skill development. However, an engineering career begun today has&#13;
fewer program experiences than in past decades because of extended program lifecycles and a&#13;
reduction in the number of new large-scale engineering programs. This pattern is clearly visible&#13;
in the aerospace industry, which (Stephens 2003) cites as already experiencing a systems&#13;
thinking shortage.&#13;
The ongoing research outlined in this paper explores systems thinking as an emergent&#13;
property of teams. Collaborative systems thinking, a term coined by the authors to denote teamlevel&#13;
systems thinking, may offer an opportunity to leverage and develop a skill in short supply&#13;
by concentrating on the team in addition to the individual.&#13;
This paper introduces the proposed definition for collaborative systems thinking, as&#13;
developed by the authors, and the outlines the structure and progress of ongoing case research&#13;
into the role of organizational culture and standard process usage in the development of&#13;
collaborative systems thinking.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding Enterprise Risk Across an Aquisition Portfolio: A Grounded Theory Approach</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84132" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wirthlin, Major Joseph R.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84132</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:21Z</updated>
<published>2008-02-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding Enterprise Risk Across an Aquisition Portfolio: A Grounded Theory Approach
Wirthlin, Major Joseph R.; Seering, Warren; Rebentisch, Eric
Every acquisition program contains risks. But what impact do these risks have on the entire portfolio of acquisition activities? What does risk at the Enterprise level really mean? For example, risk collectively could portend great danger to the acquisition manager’s overall portfolio which might be otherwise masked by traditional program performance and analysis. Alternatively, these risks also might represent opportunities to achieve greater results when analyzed from a portfolio perspective. Initial review of the literature suggests that most leaders are unable to articulate the risk carried by their portfolio of product development activities or what this means to them. However, the same literature suggests they strongly desire this capability. Beginning with a review of the applicable literature in the areas of risk, product development (acquisition) and product portfolio management, portfolio-level risk applications are found to be sparse and ill-conceived. Initial analysis of interviews with portfolio leaders involving military product development activities in portfolios of large, complex, system development will be presented with a discussion of the implications of enterprise risk for product portfolio management.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Collaborative Systems Thinking Research: Exploring Systems Thinking within Teams</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84131" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lamb, Caroline T.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84131</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:17Z</updated>
<published>2008-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Collaborative Systems Thinking Research: Exploring Systems Thinking within Teams
Lamb, Caroline T.; Rhodes, Donna H.
This paper describes ongoing research that seeks to develop an empirical basis&#13;
for collaborative systems thinking, defined as “an emergent behavior of teams resulting&#13;
from the interactions of team members and utilizing a variety of thinking styles, design&#13;
processes, tools, and communication media to consider system attributes,&#13;
interrelationships, context and dynamics towards executing systems design”. This type&#13;
of thinking is critically important to addressing engineering systems challenges, and the&#13;
research seeks to inform and enable effective systems engineering practice in&#13;
contemporary engineering enterprises. Focusing on the aerospace domain, collaborative&#13;
systems thinking is examined through the alignment of enterprise culture and standard&#13;
technical processes. This paper draws on a variety of literature to compose a definition&#13;
of collaborative systems thinking and propose a research agenda going forward.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Measuring Systems Engineering Success: Insights from Baseball</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84130" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84130</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:22:38Z</updated>
<published>2008-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Measuring Systems Engineering Success: Insights from Baseball
Blackburn, Craig; Valerdi, Ricardo
Optimizing the efficiency of socio-technical systems and determining accurate measurements of performance is a critical issue in many systems engineering enterprises. In our analysis we explore some of the recurring themes of Michael Lewis’s study of baseball, depicted in the best selling book Moneyball, and we make the connection to corresponding systems engineering principles of interest. The paper will focus on the systems engineering roadmap inspired by Lewis’ study for developing and refining a meaningful set of metrics for organizational transformation. The following steps are highlighted to convey this transformation with the assistance of metrics: identify and understand value in the enterprise and your organization; consider an integrated system focus in your organization; use cost analysis methods to implement a strategy for executing the transformation; and manage risk throughout operations and improve the process continuously.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84129" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carrigan, Geoff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Long, Dave</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cummings, M.L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Duffner, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84129</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:58Z</updated>
<published>2008-06-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash
Carrigan, Geoff; Long, Dave; Cummings, M.L.; Duffner, John
The 2006 crash of a Predator B in Arizona has prompted a great amount of scrutiny into Unmanned Arial System (UAS) operations. The direct cause of the Predator crash can be tied to an initial failure of the displays and a failed transfer of controls between operators. However, using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), many latent errors that contributed to the accident were uncovered that were not addressed by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) report. The HFACS approach for this accident examined all issues leading up to the crash and uncovered several organizational influences that were significant contributors to the Predator crash. Through augmenting NTSB efforts with the HFACS method, future UAS incidents can be prevented by addressing all causes, regardless of their distance from the pilot’s seat.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Strategy Alignment &amp; Deployment through Enterprise Change Capabilities</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84128" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, Dr. George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84128</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:58Z</updated>
<published>2008-05-13T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Strategy Alignment &amp; Deployment through Enterprise Change Capabilities
Roth, Dr. George
DoD CPI Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Changing Nature of Systems Engineering and Government Enterprises: Report from a Case Study Research Effort</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84127" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Brooks, JoAnn M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Beard, Jon W.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Carroll, John S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84127</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:58Z</updated>
<published>2008-07-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Changing Nature of Systems Engineering and Government Enterprises: Report from a Case Study Research Effort
Brooks, JoAnn M.; Beard, Jon W.; Carroll, John S.
In this paper, we examine the changing nature of systems engineering work and, in particular, how The MITRE Corporation is confronting the challenges of expanding its role and capabilities to deliver what it calls “Enterprise Systems Engineering” to its government clients. Systems engineers exemplify technical knowledge workers whose work is expanding beyond the traditional skills and habits of thought developed through their disciplinary training (cf., Davidz 2006). Changes in technology, systems acquisition practices, and enterprise structures are challenging systems engineers to expand their roles and capabilities to manage the boundaries among technological systems and organizations of many sizes and types (e.g., government customers, systems integrators, suppliers, end users). Systems development takes place in an ever more complex environment of inter-organizational enterprises where implementation increasingly catalyzes enterprise change and demands greatly expanded and often unrecognized roles beyond that of technical expert or project manager.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84126" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84126</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:39Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Ricardo
2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Systems Engineering (APCOSE) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84125" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84125</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:04Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Zen in the Art of Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Ricardo
Engineering cannot wait until all phenomena are explained. Engineers may work&#13;
effectively, often for centuries, with heuristics. This paper provides over thirty heuristics that&#13;
have been inspired by the development and application of a systems engineering cost&#13;
estimation model. The objective of this paper is to present such heuristics in a simple manner&#13;
so that they can benefit those that develop, calibrate, and use cost models.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84124" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84124</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:24Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research
Valerdi, Ricardo
2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Systems Engineering (APCOSE) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84123" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84123</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cultural Barriers to the Adoption of Systems Engineering Research
Valerdi, Ricardo
An extensive amount of time and money is spent on developing methodologies and tools to improve the systems engineering process but much less is spent on addressing the organizational factors that can facilitate or hinder their adoption. This is partially due to engineering approach to problem solving which is technology centric. What is needed is an organization centric approach that complements the methods and tools being developed and considers the context in which they will be used.&#13;
This paper explores the notion of adoption of systems engineering research by focusing on a specific example involving measurement systems. Results from an industry survey on the most critical attributes for adoption are presented and implications of these results are discussed in terms of the broader issue of systems engineering research.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Paradigms of Development and Employment of Weapon Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84121" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gillespie, Daniel M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84121</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:19Z</updated>
<published>2008-10-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Paradigms of Development and Employment of Weapon Systems
Gillespie, Daniel M.
Weapons procurement decisions are extremely complex, with an unmanageable quantity of variables to take into account. The human brain, unable to process such a complex problem in a strictly rational way, seeks mechanisms to bound the problem and therefore simplify it. One way this occurs is through the development of paradigms, or common viewpoints held by decision makers that incorporate the irrational, emotional, and qualitative experience and knowledge, as well as quantitative knowledge such as analysis and test results. A paradigm in use by decision makers in the U.S. Air Force is the propensity to buy weapons developed and produced in America. This study traces the origins of this paradigm, and how it evolved over time. Drawing on examples from recent history it identifies the sources of the paradigm which are: a need to maintain the nation’s technological base, the inadequacy of foreign weaponry to meet U.S. needs, the fact that the U.S. economy is able to support a strong defense industry, the ability to advance its policies by transfer of weapons to allies, the desire to share standardized equipment with allies, and the desire to gain the economic benefits from being an exporter of weapons. It concludes that existing paradigms influence what weapon systems the U.S. will procure, and that in turn affects the strategy the nation employs. Relating the paradigm of American-made weapons procurement to the cases of the F-35 fighter and the recently cancelled Air Force tanker program, it asks questions about the future of weapons procurement choices in a global defense environment.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-10-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Product Development in the Aerospace Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84120" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84120</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T21:11:39Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Product Development in the Aerospace Enterprise
Rebentisch, Eric
The International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS) 2008 Annual Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Transformation Framework</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84119" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84119</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:03Z</updated>
<published>2008-05-13T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Transformation Framework
Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
DoD CPI Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-05-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Architecting Lean Software Enterprises: The TODC Story</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84118" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth 'JK'</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84118</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:23Z</updated>
<published>2008-12-13T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Architecting Lean Software Enterprises: The TODC Story
Srinivasan, Jayakanth 'JK'
Workshop on Open Innovation in Services, University of Cambridge, UK presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-12-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Driving Open Innovation: Learning from Three Cases</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84117" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth 'JK'</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84117</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:49Z</updated>
<published>2008-12-12T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Driving Open Innovation: Learning from Three Cases
Srinivasan, Jayakanth 'JK'
SMS Conference on Strategic Innovation in a Flat World, Indian School of Business, India presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-12-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84116" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84116</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:19Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress
Ross, Adam M.; Rhodes, Donna H.
The contemporary environment and large-scale systems&#13;
challenges motivate research in support of a new paradigm: value&#13;
robustness. Value robustness is defined as the ability of a system to&#13;
continue to deliver stakeholder value in the face of changing contexts&#13;
and needs. The authors’ research seeks to develop methods for&#13;
concept exploration, architecting, and design using a dynamic&#13;
perspective for the purpose of realizing systems, products, and&#13;
services that deliver sustained value to stakeholders in a changing&#13;
world. The research is aimed at improving the development of real&#13;
world systems and systems of systems, and involves deep engagement&#13;
with government and industry stakeholders in the research conduct&#13;
and the transition of research outcomes to industry practice.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Navigating the Metrics Landscape: An Introductory Literature Guide to Metric Selection, Implementation, &amp; Decision Making</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84114" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84114</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:43:38Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Navigating the Metrics Landscape: An Introductory Literature Guide to Metric Selection, Implementation, &amp; Decision Making
Blackburn, Craig; Valerdi, Ricardo
The focus of this paper is to depict the vast landscape of literature related to enterprise performance measurement in a concise and comprehensible manner for researchers and practitioners. We focus particularly on the enterprise as the unit of analysis and consider measurement systems from stakeholders at all levels. A broad range of considerations will be explored, ranging from micro-level considerations such as employee performance measurement to macro-level considerations such as enterprise measurement systems. Moreover, we discuss measurement-related problems identified in practice and solutions proposed in academic literature. To illustrate this evolution of measurement knowledge over time, we discuss the effects of metrics from three distinct viewpoints: (1) selecting the right metrics, (2) creating and implementing measurement frameworks; and (3) metrics for decision making.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Practical Implementation of an Enterprise Measurement System: From Inception to Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84112" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, 2ndLt. Craig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84112</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:24Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Practical Implementation of an Enterprise Measurement System: From Inception to Transformation
Blackburn, 2ndLt. Craig; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Navigating the Metrics Landscape: An Introductory Literature Guide to Metric Selection, Implementation, &amp; Decision Making</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84110" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, 2ndLt. Craig</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84110</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:43:37Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Navigating the Metrics Landscape: An Introductory Literature Guide to Metric Selection, Implementation, &amp; Decision Making
Blackburn, 2ndLt. Craig; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Development Process Standardization in Multi-Project Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84109" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84109</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T00:21:46Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Development Process Standardization in Multi-Project Organizations
Rupani, Sid
20th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS 2009) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Complexity and Mode Choice in Global Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84107" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Makumbe, Pedzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Prof. Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Dr. Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84107</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T17:50:33Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Complexity and Mode Choice in Global Product Development
Makumbe, Pedzi; Seering, Prof. Warren; Rebentisch, Dr. Eric
20th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS 2009) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Complexity and Mode Choice in Global Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84106" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Makumbe, Pedzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84106</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:43:30Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Complexity and Mode Choice in Global Product Development
Makumbe, Pedzi; Seering, Warren; Rebentisch, Eric
Despite the growth in the practice of global product development, little work has been done to&#13;
understand factors that influence mode choice in global product development. Our research fills&#13;
this gap in the literature by empirically investigating variables that drive firms to either globally&#13;
outsource, globally partner or develop modules themselves in a foreign country. We assume a&#13;
product-centric view, and combine the transaction cost theory and the resource based view of the&#13;
firm to explain mode choices based on the analysis of electromechanical products developed&#13;
across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and South America for (or by) American firms. Though&#13;
we focus on complexity, we address product content specificity, product strategic importance&#13;
and designer’s technological capability as well. We find significant relationships between the&#13;
type of global product development and the product characteristics. However, the significance of&#13;
the relationship between complexity and the mode varies by region when we divide the world&#13;
into emerging countries and mature countries. While the relationship is significant in the&#13;
emerging countries, it is not significant in mature countries. These findings have implications for decision making in systematically assigning modes of development to different products being&#13;
developed globally.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi‐Project Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84105" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84105</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:05Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi‐Project Organizations
Rupani, Sid
2nd International Symposium on Engineering Systems presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Teaching an Engineering Systems Doctoral Seminar: Concepts and Structure</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84104" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roberts, Christopher</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Magee, Prof. Christopher</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sussman, Prof. Joseph</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84104</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:06Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Teaching an Engineering Systems Doctoral Seminar: Concepts and Structure
Roberts, Christopher; Magee, Prof. Christopher; Sussman, Prof. Joseph
Second International Symposium on Engineering Systems presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Systems Principles</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84103" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84103</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:04Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Systems Principles
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
International Engineering Systems Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Re-conceptualizing the Work of Systems Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84102" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dixit, Indrajeet</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84102</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:21Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Re-conceptualizing the Work of Systems Engineers
Dixit, Indrajeet; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
MIT 2nd International Engineering Systems Symposium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Harmonizing Systems and Software Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84096" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wang, Gan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gaffney, John E. Jr.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84096</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:01:25Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Harmonizing Systems and Software Cost Estimation
Wang, Gan; Valerdi, Ricardo; Gaffney, John E. Jr.
The objective of this paper is to examine the gaps and overlaps between software and systems engineering cost models with intent to harmonize the estimates in engineering engineering estimation.  In particular, we evaluate the central assumptions of the COSYSMO and COCOMO II models and propose an approach to identify gaps and overlaps between them. We provide guidelines on how to reconcile and resolve the identified gaps and overlaps.  The ultimate purpose of this work is to develop effective techniques for accurately estimating the combined systems and software engineering effort for software-intensive systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Towards a Holistic, Total Engineering Cost Model</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84095" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wang, Gan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Turnidge, Jon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shernoff, Alex</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84095</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:22Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Towards a Holistic, Total Engineering Cost Model
Wang, Gan; Turnidge, Jon; Shernoff, Alex; Valerdi, Ricardo
In this paper, we explore a new approach for a unified and interdisciplinary&#13;
model for estimating the total engineering effort in developing and delivering a parametric software-intensive complex system.  We begin by reviewing some of the limitations of using existing engineering discipline-focused tools for estimating total engineering cost and by articulating the benefits of such a holistic model.  Applying a two step method combining heuristic analysis and data validation, we propose three hypotheses to expand the basic cost estimating relationship of COSYSMO, a systems engineering model, to the total engineering scope by including software size drivers. The implementation of the hypotheses and the validation approach are also discussed.  We conclude the discussion by outlining the future work required to realize such a model and to apply it to supporting successful system development endeavours.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Exploration of Matching Teaching to the Learning Preferences of Systems Engineering Graduate Students</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84094" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ferris, Tim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Jain, Rashmi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kasser, Joseph</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84094</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:43Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Exploration of Matching Teaching to the Learning Preferences of Systems Engineering Graduate Students
Valerdi, Ricardo; Ferris, Tim; Jain, Rashmi; Kasser, Joseph
This paper provides an exploratory study on the relationship between learnings of systems engineering graduate students and delivery methods of systems preference engineering coursework.  We begin by providing an overview of learning in the systems engineering context, followed by two central research questions that guide the rest of the paper.   Our study is focused on measuring learning preferences based on a previously developed survey instrument called VARK.  We provide a detailed description of VARK and some insight into the existing database that sheds light on the typical distribution of learning preferences across disciplines.  We provide some preliminary results and discuss their implications on systems engineering curriculum development and delivery.  Finally, we discuss additional questions that remain to be explored as we strive to understand the learning preferences of systems engineering graduate students.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Human Element of Decision Making in Systems Engineers: A Focus on Optimism</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84093" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Blackburn, Craig</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84093</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:05Z</updated>
<published>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Human Element of Decision Making in Systems Engineers: A Focus on Optimism
Valerdi, Ricardo; Blackburn, Craig
Biases continue to be an important aspect of human judgment and decision making&#13;
because they can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Optimism bias is one type of bias that is often overlooked because of its association with good health and positive outcomes. However, the existence of optimism bias in human judgment can be very damaging especially when it distorts a person’s view of future events.&#13;
In order to better understand optimism bias we explore the benefits and downsides of optimism&#13;
as well as some empirically-based origins of both optimism and pessimism.  This provides a backdrop for a methodology for quantifying optimism and pessimism using the Brier score developed for calibrating weather reporters and a discussion about how sports bookies make well-calibrated decisions.  Results are explored from an optimism survey given to a cohort of eighty systems engineers, which ultimately portray the degree to which optimism bias influences decision making in large projects. Further exploration of the key differences in optimism across professions helps distinguish motivational factors and characteristics of well-calibrated professions. We also present results from a calibration exercise, designed to infer if such activities can be adopted to assist systems engineering estimation. Finally, we provide prescriptive advice on how individual decision makers can better manage their optimism and become more realistic.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-07-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Approaches to Calculating Systems Engineering Schedule in Parametric Cost Models</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84092" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gaffney, John E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ross, Michael A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84092</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:05Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Approaches to Calculating Systems Engineering Schedule in Parametric Cost Models
Gaffney, John E.; Valerdi, Ricardo; Ross, Michael A.
This  paper  provides  two  similar  approaches  for  calculating  project  schedule  from  a  systems  engineering  perspective.  To&#13;
illustrate  the genesis  of each  approach,  we provide  two  analogies;  one  from  economics  and  one from  physics. These  are complemented  with mathematical  derivations  that provide  quantitative  comparisons  of the tradeoff between  the duration of a project and the optimal effort.  Connections are made to Books’ Law and Parkinson’s Law to validate the theoretical discussion&#13;
with the pragmatic observations from the software engineering literature.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Exploring the Sources of Enterprise Agility in Software Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84091" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lundqvist, Kristina</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Norstöm, Christer</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84091</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:24Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Exploring the Sources of Enterprise Agility in Software Organizations
Srinivasan, Jayakanth; Lundqvist, Kristina; Norstöm, Christer
Organizations involved in the design, development and sustainment of software systems have to&#13;
manage the tension between creating new products and services, while at the same time maintaining their existing portfolio. This paper explores the sources of enterprise agility in software firms, wherein agility is defined as the ability of the organization to sense changes in its environment (both internal and external), and effectively respond to these changes. Using engaged scholarship as the overarching paradigm, we report on the findings of a process study that uses semi-structured interviews, observation, and archival firm &amp; project information for data gathering, and grounded theory methods and comparative case analysis for data analysis and  theory  generation.  The  analysis  highlights  the  importance  of  the  four  organizational enablers of: stakeholder alignment, employee empowerment, group &amp; organizational learning, and governance mechanisms, as necessary but not sufficient precursors to obtaining enterprise agility. Furthermore, we provide illustrative case examples of the three mechanisms: Continuous Improvement, Creating Systems of Innovation, and Leveraging Globally available Capabilities,&#13;
that software organizations use to gain enterprise agility.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Principles of Enterprise Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84089" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84089</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:24Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Principles of Enterprise Systems
Nightingale, Deborah
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) through its Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI)&#13;
research team has been conducting research and facilitating enterprise-level transformations in large complex sociotechnical enterprises for over fifteen years. These enterprises have spanned a broad base of industries and governmental organizations including aerospace, automotive,&#13;
electronics, health care, transportation, construction, defense acquisition and logistics, research labs and many others. What has emerged from both the action research in the field and its application in case studies in graduate courses is the concept of “overarching” enterprise principles and transformation methodologies that are independent of the industry or organization. A framework for transformation that consists of a set of interdependent methodologies, tools and enterprise principles that support holistic enterprise transformation is described and includes the following five elements: 1) Key Principles of Enterprise Thinking, 2) Enterprise Transformation Roadmap, 3) Lean Enterprise Self Assessment Tool (LESAT), 4) Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation (ESAT) and 5) Enterprise Architecting Framework. The application of this framework to the enterprise systems analysis and design of various industry and governmental organizations is discussed.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Estimating Systems Engineering Reuse</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84088" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fortune, Jared</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Boehm, Barry W.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Settles, F. Stan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84088</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:06Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Estimating Systems Engineering Reuse
Fortune, Jared; Valerdi, Ricardo; Boehm, Barry W.; Settles, F. Stan
Systems  engineering  reuse  is  the  utilization  of  previously  developed  systems  engineering  products  or  artifacts  such  as&#13;
architectures, requirements, and test plans across different projects. Such reuse is intended as a means of reducing development cost, project schedule, or performance risk, by avoiding the repetition of some systems engineering activities. Although projects involving systems engineering  reuse are becoming more frequent, models or tools for estimating the cost, benefit, and overall impact on a project as a result of reusing products or artifacts have not yet been adequately developed. This paper provides an overview  of  systems  engineering  reuse  and  recent  developments  with  the  Constructive  Systems  Engineering  Cost  Model (COSYSMO) to estimate the effect of reuse on systems engineering effort. The overview of systems engineering reuse includes a review of how reuse is handled in other domains and results from an industry survey. The recent developments  in COSYSMO presents on-going research in the creation of a reuse extension for the model such as the identification of categories of systems engineering reuse, reuse extensions for the size drivers in the model, and a revised set of cost drivers.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Beyond Cost: Product Complexity and the Global Product Development Location Advantage</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84087" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Makumbe, Pedzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84087</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:43Z</updated>
<published>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Beyond Cost: Product Complexity and the Global Product Development Location Advantage
Makumbe, Pedzi; Seering, Warren; Rebentisch, Eric
Discussions  of location advantages in global product development  are largely based on self-reported&#13;
surveys, and often agnostic to product characteristics. We build on this previous work by investigating location advantages and the influence of product complexity using negative binomial models. We find that  the  likelihood  of  developing  products  in  a  country  increases  as  its  market  size,  number  of engineering graduates and national capability increases. However, it neither varies with labor cost nor market growth rate. We also find that complex products are more likely to be developed in countries&#13;
with high national capability, and national capability is directly related to firm capability.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Finding Opportunities for Commonality in Complex Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84086" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Long, Lt. Col. David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84086</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:52:44Z</updated>
<published>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Finding Opportunities for Commonality in Complex Systems
Long, Lt. Col. David; Seering, Warren; Rebentisch, Eric
Many complex systems with similar functionalities are independently developed, entered into service, and must be supported through their lifecycles. Costs to support and maintain the systems could be decreased by employing strategies that increase commonality in the systems. We present a process for identifying opportunities and evaluating subsystems for increasing commonality in complex systems. Stakeholders can use our process to improve system management and decrease support costs of systems.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Teaching an Engineering Systems Doctoral Seminar: Concepts and Structure</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84078" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roberts, Christopher J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Magee, Christopher L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sussman, Joseph M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84078</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:44Z</updated>
<published>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Teaching an Engineering Systems Doctoral Seminar: Concepts and Structure
Roberts, Christopher J.; Magee, Christopher L.; Sussman, Joseph M.
This paper describes the current state of the evolving engineering systems doctoral seminar in&#13;
the Engineering Systems Division (ESD) at MIT. This subject is required for all first year&#13;
engineering systems doctoral students. It is intended to bring them into the culture of ESD, and&#13;
to establish a common base on which subsequent subjects can build. It is the first of three&#13;
required subjects that make up the core of the ESD doctoral program. The seminar is intended&#13;
to provide students with the foundations and context of engineering systems, largely focused on&#13;
providing an appreciation for the many facets of socio-technical complexity. We discuss the&#13;
seminar’s pedagogy, learning objectives, assignments and readings, and provide insights gained&#13;
from teaching the course.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Scenario Planning in Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84076" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roberts, Christopher J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Richards, Matthew G.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ross, Adam M.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hastings, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84076</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:26Z</updated>
<published>2009-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Scenario Planning in Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration
Roberts, Christopher J.; Richards, Matthew G.; Ross, Adam M.; Rhodes, Donna H.; Hastings, Daniel E.
The long time scales associated with complex system&#13;
design and operation necessitate front-end systems engineering&#13;
methodologies that enable consideration of alternative futures.&#13;
This paper advances scenario planning techniques through a&#13;
parameterization and ordering of potential future contexts and&#13;
stakeholder expectations (e.g., articulated system attributes,&#13;
available technology, funding levels, and supporting&#13;
infrastructures). After surveying existing approaches for scenario&#13;
planning, a methodology for specifying and analyzing large&#13;
numbers of alternative system timelines is presented. A satellite&#13;
radar case study is used to motivate and illustrate the value of&#13;
this approach. Benefits of the methodology include: (1) broader&#13;
and more rigorous consideration of alternative future needs,&#13;
contexts, and timelines, (2) identification of gaps in traditionally-derived&#13;
scenario sets, (3) identification of passively value-robust&#13;
system alternatives, and (4) providing a basis for evaluating&#13;
system evolution strategies that enable sustainment of value&#13;
delivery across potential timelines.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84075" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84075</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T14:56:26Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations
Rupani, Sid
INFORMS Annual Meeting presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Development Practices for Meeting Financial Objectives</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84074" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Makumbe, Pedzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gupta, Nisheeth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Barrett, Christie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gordon, Mike</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Musso, Chris</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Link, Jochen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84074</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T14:55:45Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Development Practices for Meeting Financial Objectives
Makumbe, Pedzi; Gupta, Nisheeth; Rebentisch, Eric; Seering, Warren; Barrett, Christie; Gordon, Mike; Musso, Chris; Link, Jochen
This paper reports product development practices that separate the most successful product development programs from the rest. A detailed understanding of best product development practices is important because product development is fundamental to corporate success (Clark &amp; Fujimoto, 1991; Eisenhardt &amp; Tabrizi, 1995; Eppinger &amp; Chitkara, 2006). Teams from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and McKinsey and Company have collaborated to investigate practices used for 112 product development projects at 57 firms in the medical device, industrial, and high-tech industries. Preliminary results suggest that certain practices are particularly important for influencing project outcomes. Our research is consistent with and contributes to best practices reported previously by the Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) (see Barczak, Griffin, &amp; Kahn, 2009; Griffin &amp; Page, 1996; Page, 1993). As this previous research has shown, best practices in product development evolve. For example, the 1990 PDMA study found that successful firms differentiated themselves from the rest by having well defined New Product Development (NPD) processes and new product strategies (Page, 1993). The second study, conducted in 1995, found that successful firms measured their product development efforts and outcomes, did qualitative market research, and used engineering design tools such as CAD (Griffin &amp; Page, 1996). The third study, completed in 2003, found that successful firms put more emphasis on portfolio management, use a wide variety of software tools, have supporting organizational mechanisms and processes in place, and use formal processes for generating ideas (Barczak, Griffin, &amp; Kahn, 2009). The findings presented here contribute additional understanding of practices that lead to successful product development. Researchers and practitioners often investigate product development from the perspectives of cost, schedule, and performance. There are many more ways to evaluate product development processes and outcomes (Cooper, 1979). Griffin and Page (1996) identified over 75 different product development metrics documented in the literature. Some researchers categorize these metrics into firm level, project level, or product level metrics (e.g. Montoya-Weiss &amp; Calantone, 1994); others categorize them into financial and non-financial metrics (e.g. Hart, 1993). This paper presents our work on correlating product development practices with a broad set of financial metrics.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>High Performing Hospital Enterprise Architecture: Insights from a Multi-method Exploratory Case</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84073" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Oliveira, Jorge F.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wachendorf, Maria T.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84073</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T15:42:56Z</updated>
<published>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">High Performing Hospital Enterprise Architecture: Insights from a Multi-method Exploratory Case
Oliveira, Jorge F.; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Wachendorf, Maria T.
The US healthcare system is a critical infrastructure grappling with as much as 16% of the GDP in its expenditures and unsatisfactory outcomes, and undergoing considerable public scrutiny. High ranking officials have both singled out the US healthcare system as the most expensive and among the least effective in the developed world. Hospitals hoping to find “The Toyota Way” so as to rid themselves of waste through lean and six sigma improvement initiatives, have mostly focused in applying tools at a process level, rather than adopting an enterprise perspective and understanding the full breadth of their socio-technical complexity. This paper adopts a systems thinking approach in describing a leading Boston hospital’s enterprise architecture through a multi-method exploratory case. The initial exploratory question proposed by hospital senior leadership was “How to speed patient flow in the Emergency Department?”, however as results became available, the scope was expanded to include the whole hospital enterprise. Both qualitative and quantitative data evidence were collected through a variety of methods, namely observation, archival records, documentation, and interviews. Analysis includes techniques consistent with the grounded theory approach, as well as more traditional quantitative data analysis. Hospital enterprise performance is hypothesized to be related to hospital enterprise architecture, and an alternative hospital enterprise architecture is proposed as well as future work.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Collaborative Systems Thinking: Uncovering the Rules of Team-level Systems Thinking</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84071" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84071</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T09:47:59Z</updated>
<published>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Collaborative Systems Thinking: Uncovering the Rules of Team-level Systems Thinking
Twomey Lamb, Caroline; Rhodes, Donna H.
IEEE International Systems Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>PD Practices for Meeting Financial and Operational Objectives</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84070" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Makumbe, Pedzi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gupta, Nisheeth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gordon, Mike</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Barrett, Christie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Musso, Chris</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Link, Jochen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84070</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:22Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">PD Practices for Meeting Financial and Operational Objectives
Makumbe, Pedzi; Gupta, Nisheeth; Rebentisch, Eric; Seering, Warren; Gordon, Mike; Barrett, Christie; Musso, Chris; Link, Jochen
33rd Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) Annual International Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Optimizing Optimism in Systems Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84069" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84069</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T09:32:40Z</updated>
<published>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Optimizing Optimism in Systems Engineers
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
Biases continue to be an important aspect of human judgment and decision making because they often occur subconsciously and can frequently lead to unfavorable outcomes. Optimism bias is one type of cognitive illusion that is often overlooked because of its association with good health and positive outcomes. However, the existence of optimism bias in human judgment can be very damaging especially when it distorts a person's view of future events.&#13;
In order to better understand optimism bias we explore the benefits and downsides of optimism as well as some empirically-based origins of both optimism and pessimism. This provides a backdrop for a methodology for quantifying optimism and pessimism followed by a discussion about certain professions that make well-calibrated decisions.&#13;
Results are explored from an optimism survey given to a cohort of eighty systems engineers, which ultimately portray the degree to which optimism bias influences decision making in the estimation of cost and schedule of large projects. A calibration exercise is designed to calibrate optimism in systems engineers with the ultimate goal of helping cost estimation realism. Finally, prescriptive advice is provided to help individual decision makers better optimize their optimism.&#13;
The implications of this work are twofold. First, the mechanism for quantifying optimism in systems engineers provides useful insight into the degree of optimism that exists among this group of decision makers. This can influence a number of decision making processes that may traditionally be seen as immune from biases due to their routine nature. Second, the process for calibrating optimism provides a way to validate the effectiveness of optimism reduction techniques on different types of decision makers. It also helps to distinguish between certain people who are more receptive to bias corrections and are therefore more likely to be better estimators in real life.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Cost Models to Capture Project Risk: A Knowledge-Based Approach</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84068" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84068</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:55:05Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Cost Models to Capture Project Risk: A Knowledge-Based Approach
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
12th ECALAS (ECATA Alumni Association) International Aerospace Seminar: Risk and Opportunity Management in Programs presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI) at MIT and Principles of Enterprise Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84067" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84067</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T14:52:44Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI) at MIT and Principles of Enterprise Systems
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
Boeing Lean+ Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Principles of Lean Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84066" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84066</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:25Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Principles of Lean Enterprises
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
BAE Systems 2009 Global Lean Summit
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Lean Enterprise Systems Approach to Healthcare Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84049" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84049</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:57:59Z</updated>
<published>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Lean Enterprise Systems Approach to Healthcare Transformation
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
MIT Conference on Systems Thinking for Contemporary Challenges presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Deploying the LAI Lean Academy at Northeastern University</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84048" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84048</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:22:35Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Deploying the LAI Lean Academy at Northeastern University
McManus, Hugh
2009 Lean Educator Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Designing a Lean Healthcare Curriculum</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84047" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84047</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:58:56Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Designing a Lean Healthcare Curriculum
Murman, Earll M.
Lean Educator Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84046" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84046</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:08Z</updated>
<published>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Unbundling Standardization: Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations
Rupani, Sid
CCC Annual Doctoral Colloquium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Finding Common Ground: A Value-Focused Approach to Military UAS Airspace Integration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84045" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cropsey, Major Luke C.G.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84045</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:58:50Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Finding Common Ground: A Value-Focused Approach to Military UAS Airspace Integration
Cropsey, Major Luke C.G.
Integrating unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into nonsegregated1 airspace is a topic of much debate and significant energy, particularly with respect to military operations. This paper applies leading‐edge research in enterprise architecting and value focused thinking to examine the development of alternative approaches to the U.S. military’s UAS airspace integration challenge. The motivation for this research drew upon several years of experience the author had in attempting to coordinate and integrate multiple U.S. military and other government agencies in an effort to secure wider operational use of nonsegregated airspace for military UAS operations.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems Test and Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84044" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ferreira, Susan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Medvidović, Nenad</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Deonandan, Indira</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hess, John</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mikaelian, Tsoline</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shull, Gayle</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84044</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:03Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems Test and Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities
Ferreira, Susan; Medvidović, Nenad; Deonandan, Indira; Valerdi, Ricardo; Hess, John; Mikaelian, Tsoline; Shull, Gayle
The introduction of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems (UAS) brings substantial, interesting, and in many cases, new challenges to the Department of Defense’s Test and Evaluation community. The test and evaluation of UASs becomes significantly more complicated than traditional systems, especially as we approach more fully autonomous systems and need to test integrated systems of systems in joint military operational testing environments. Compounding the multi-faceted considerations involved in test and evaluation, systems have continuously increasing complexity and capabilities and can be at different maturity levels. Emergent properties, particularly those that are unplanned and undesired, also need to be considered. Challenges identified by the Unmanned and Autonomous Systems Test community and related to the test and evaluation of the UASs are discussed. This paper presents various approaches for addressing these challenges including an innovative Prescriptive and Adaptive Testing Framework and decision support system, PATFrame.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Accelerating System of Systems Engineering Understanding and Optimization through Lean Enterprise Principles</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84043" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lane, Jo Ann</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84043</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:59:12Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Accelerating System of Systems Engineering Understanding and Optimization through Lean Enterprise Principles
Lane, Jo Ann; Valerdi, Ricardo
By applying a lean enterprise lens to studies of the&#13;
evolving field of system of systems engineering (SoSE), it has been&#13;
observed that many SoSE teams are developing processes that&#13;
are consistent with many lean enterprise principles. These SoSE&#13;
processes are designed to efficiently evolve the group of systems&#13;
to meet new needs using limited resources. This paper provides&#13;
further insights and recommendations for the evolution of system&#13;
of systems processes using lean concepts. We conclude with a&#13;
discussion of the potential conflicts between SoSE and lean&#13;
paradigms and provide thirteen SoS case studies to illustrate the&#13;
emphasis on lean thinking.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>When Systems Thinking Is Not a Natural Act</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84042" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rouse, William B.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84042</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:07Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">When Systems Thinking Is Not a Natural Act
Valerdi, Ricardo; Rouse, William B.
Competence in systems thinking is implicitly&#13;
assumed among the population of engineers and managers – in&#13;
fact, most technical people will self-identify as systems&#13;
thinkers. But systems thinking competencies are not as&#13;
prevalent as these assertions might lead one to assume.&#13;
Controlled experiments show that systems thinking&#13;
performance, even among highly educated people, is poor. This&#13;
paper provides a set of systems thinking competencies and&#13;
demonstrates how these are not as common as advertised. We&#13;
also discuss how these competencies can be measured. Our&#13;
main thesis is that systems thinking is not a natural act because&#13;
evolution has favored mechanisms tuned to dealing with&#13;
immediate surface features of problems. We discuss the&#13;
implications of this philosophy and provide recommendations&#13;
for closing
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Better Requirements Decomposition Guidelines Can Improve Cost Estimation of Systems Engineering and Human Systems Integration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84041" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Liu, 2ndLt. Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, R.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Laplante, P.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84041</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:53:51Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Better Requirements Decomposition Guidelines Can Improve Cost Estimation of Systems Engineering and Human Systems Integration
Liu, 2ndLt. Kevin; Valerdi, R.; Laplante, P.
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Automating Systems Engineering Risk Assessment</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84040" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Madachy, Ray</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84040</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:37Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Automating Systems Engineering Risk Assessment
Madachy, Ray; Valerdi, Ricardo
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>COSYSMO &amp; COSYSMO-R Parameter Estimation Biases</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84039" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Smith, Eric D.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Pineda, Ricardo L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Aldous, Karla</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84039</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:56:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">COSYSMO &amp; COSYSMO-R Parameter Estimation Biases
Smith, Eric D.; Pineda, Ricardo L.; Aldous, Karla; Valerdi, Ricardo
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lessons Learned about Mixed Methods Research Strategies in Systems Engineering: Evidence from PhD Dissertations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84038" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Liu, 2ndLt. Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Fortune, Dr. Jared</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84038</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:56:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lessons Learned about Mixed Methods Research Strategies in Systems Engineering: Evidence from PhD Dissertations
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo; Liu, 2ndLt. Kevin; Fortune, Dr. Jared
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Towards a Framework of Research Methodology Choices in Systems Engineering</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84037" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Brown, Samantha</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Muller, Gerrit</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84037</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:03Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Towards a Framework of Research Methodology Choices in Systems Engineering
Brown, Samantha; Valerdi, Ricardo; Muller, Gerrit
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER)
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Role of Complexities in Systems Engineering Cost Estimating Processes</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84036" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Young, Leone Z.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Farr, Dr. John V.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84036</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:10Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Role of Complexities in Systems Engineering Cost Estimating Processes
Young, Leone Z.; Farr, Dr. John V.; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
8th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER) presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Systems-of-Systems Perspective on Healthcare: Insights from Two Multi-method Exploratory Cases of Leading UK and US Hospitals</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84035" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Oliviera, Jorge F.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wachendorf, Maria T.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84035</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:31Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Systems-of-Systems Perspective on Healthcare: Insights from Two Multi-method Exploratory Cases of Leading UK and US Hospitals
Oliviera, Jorge F.; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Wachendorf, Maria T.
Several developed nations around the world are grappling with high healthcare expenditures and unsatisfactory outcomes. High level country benchmarks show that there is wide variation in health outcomes for countries with similar levels of income and education [1,2,3], and the US healthcare system in particular is often singled out as the least effective system amongst developed countries [4]. A common US and UK characteristic is that the highest source of healthcare expenditures are hospital services and infrastructure [5,6]. Consequently, the strategies and operations developed and implemented by hospitals have a significant effect on access, quality, and cost of care [7]. This paper’s intended contribution is twofold. Firstly, to provide a system’s perspective of healthcare beyond traditional high level country benchmarking exercises, and conduct two exploratory cases of leading hospital enterprises, one from the US and another from the UK, so as to further our understanding of hospitals’ inherent system complexity, which has remained buried within traditional high level comparative country statistics. Secondly, to address a recent call from the systems engineering community to adopt a multidisciplinary research approach that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods with the goal of further supporting the systems-of-systems (SoS) practice.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Prescriptive and Adaptive Framework for UAS SoS Testing in LVC Environment</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84034" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84034</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:30Z</updated>
<published>2010-01-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Prescriptive and Adaptive Framework for UAS SoS Testing in LVC Environment
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
ITEA Live-Virtual-Constructive Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-01-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation for the Materiel Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84033" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Dr. Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84033</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:04Z</updated>
<published>2010-04-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation for the Materiel Enterprise
Rebentisch, Dr. Eric
INFORMS Annual Meeting presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-04-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Relational Model Transformations to Reduce Complexity in SoS Requirements Traceability: Preliminary Investigation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84032" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dickerson, Charles</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84032</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:13:38Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Relational Model Transformations to Reduce Complexity in SoS Requirements Traceability: Preliminary Investigation
Dickerson, Charles; Valerdi, Ricardo
The principles and methods of Model Driven&#13;
Architecture are applied to the problem of requirements&#13;
traceability for a System of Systems (SoS). Model&#13;
transformations of operational threads are used to reduce&#13;
the complexity of modeling mission requirements and their&#13;
flow into the architecture of the SoS. The allocation of&#13;
requirements to operational mission threads (OMTs)&#13;
rather than to individual systems reduces the complexity of&#13;
the requirements tracing. Relational transformations&#13;
provide a mathematically based formalism for model&#13;
transformations that permit precise computation of the&#13;
transformation of operational threads into threads of&#13;
systems allocated from the SoS. Connectivity requirements&#13;
for the SoS are also exposed in this way and the number of&#13;
permissible system threads are seen to correspond directly&#13;
to the number of permissible transformations. The&#13;
principles and methods are illustrated by an elementary&#13;
case study for sensor fusion.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Test and Evaluation of a SoS using a Prescriptive and Adaptive Testing Framework</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84031" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hess, John T.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84031</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:16:10Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Test and Evaluation of a SoS using a Prescriptive and Adaptive Testing Framework
Hess, John T.; Valerdi, Ricardo
Testers need the ability to adapt test planning on the order of days and weeks. PATFrame will use its reasoning engine to prescribe the most effective strategies for the situation at hand. Strategies in this context include methods of experimental designs, test schedules and resource allocation. By facilitating rapid planning and re-planning, the PATFrame reasoning engine will enable users to use information learned during the test process to improve the effectiveness of their own testing rather than simply follow a preset schedule. This capability is particularly attractive in the domain of Systems of Systems testing because the complexity of test planning and scheduling make frequent re-planning by hand infeasible.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cost and Risk Considerations for Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84030" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Deonandan, Indira</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lane, Jo Ann</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Macias, Filiberto</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84030</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:04:43Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cost and Risk Considerations for Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems
Deonandan, Indira; Valerdi, Ricardo; Lane, Jo Ann; Macias, Filiberto
The evolutionary nature of Unmanned and Autonomous systems of systems (UASoS) acquisition needs to be matched by evolutionary test capabilities yet to be developed. As part of this effort we attempt to understand the cost and risk considerations for UASoS Test and Evaluation (T&amp;E) and propose the development of a parametric cost model to conduct trade-off analyses. This paper focuses on understanding the need for effort estimation for UASoS, the limitations of existing cost estimation models, and how our effort can be merged with the cost estimation processes. We present the prioritization of both technical and organizational cost drivers. We note that all drivers associated with time constraints, integration, complexity, understanding of architecture and requirements are rated highly, while those regarding stakeholders and team cohesion are rated as medium. We intend for our cost model approach to provide management guidance to the T&amp;E community in estimating the effort required for UASoS T&amp;E.
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cost and Risk Considerations for Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84029" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Deonandan, Indira</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Lane, JoAnn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Macias, Filiberto</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84029</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T00:21:46Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cost and Risk Considerations for Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems of Systems
Deonandan, Indira; Valerdi, Ricardo; Lane, JoAnn; Macias, Filiberto
IEEE Systems of Systems Engineering Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Measure Commonality</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84028" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Friedman, Alissa H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84028</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:30Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Improving Enterprise Decision-Making: The Benefits of Measure Commonality
Friedman, Alissa H.
14th Annual PSM Users' Group Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Heuristics for Systems Engineering Cost Estimation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84027" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84027</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:31Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Heuristics for Systems Engineering Cost Estimation
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
14th Annual PSM Users' Group Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Practical Software and Systems Measurement: A Foundation for Objective Project Management</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84026" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Peña, Mauricio</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84026</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T12:10:36Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Practical Software and Systems Measurement: A Foundation for Objective Project Management
Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo; Peña, Mauricio
COSYSMO Requirements Volatility Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Use of the Air Force HSI Requirements Pocket Guide to Improve Writing and Interpretation of Human-Centered Requirements</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84025" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Liu, Kevin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Simpkiss, Bridget</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Greene, Fran</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84025</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T12:10:36Z</updated>
<published>2010-07-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Use of the Air Force HSI Requirements Pocket Guide to Improve Writing and Interpretation of Human-Centered Requirements
Liu, Kevin; Simpkiss, Bridget; Valerdi, Ricardo; Greene, Fran
Undersea Human Systems Integration Symposium 2010 presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-07-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How Engineers Really Think About Risk: A Study of JPL Engineers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84024" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hihn, Dr. Jairus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Chattopadhyay, Deb</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84024</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:49Z</updated>
<published>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">How Engineers Really Think About Risk: A Study of JPL Engineers
Hihn, Dr. Jairus; Chattopadhyay, Deb; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
25th International Forum on COCOMO and Systems/Software Cost Modeling presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Characterizing the Impact of Requirements Volatility on Systems Engineering Effort</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84023" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Peña, Mauricio</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84023</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:57:57Z</updated>
<published>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Characterizing the Impact of Requirements Volatility on Systems Engineering Effort
Peña, Mauricio; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo
25th International Forum on COCOMO and Systems/Software Cost Modeling presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Systematic Approach to Estimate the Life Cycle Cost and Effort of Project Management for Technology Centric Systems Development Projects</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84022" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Young, Leone</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Wade, Dr. Jon</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84022</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Systematic Approach to Estimate the Life Cycle Cost and Effort of Project Management for Technology Centric Systems Development Projects
Young, Leone; Valerdi, Dr. Ricardo; Wade, Dr. Jon
25th International Forum on COCOMO and Systems/Software Cost Modeling presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-11-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Development, Validation and Implementation Considerations of a Decision Support System for Unmanned &amp; Autonomous System of Systems Test &amp; Evaluation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84021" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cowart, Kris</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kenley, C. Robert</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84021</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-06-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Development, Validation and Implementation Considerations of a Decision Support System for Unmanned &amp; Autonomous System of Systems Test &amp; Evaluation
Cowart, Kris; Valerdi, Ricardo; Kenley, C. Robert
Test Week 2010, Policies, Programs, People, and Resources presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-06-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Survey of Systems and Improvement Approaches for Psychological Healthcare</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84020" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wang, Judy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kamin, Cody</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Glover, Wiljeana J.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84020</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:53:06Z</updated>
<published>2011-05-21T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Survey of Systems and Improvement Approaches for Psychological Healthcare
Wang, Judy; Kamin, Cody; Glover, Wiljeana J.
This paper reviews the literature to date that uses industrial and systems engineering and operations management methods to improve psychological healthcare in the military setting as well as in the civilian sector. The study findings are categorized using an Enterprise Architecture framework; the categorization highlights the enterprise architecting views that have been more thoroughly studied and those areas that have not been addressed as extensively by the present research. The review also found that methods based in industrial and systems engineering and operations management concepts related to improvements in policy may be developed more holistically in the both the military and civilian sectors. In conclusion, methods used to improve psychological healthcare in both sectors may be transferable across sectors and should be considered for to the improvement of psychological health at large.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI and Enterprise Excellence: Presented to Lean Flight Initiative 4</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84019" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kenley, C. Robert</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84019</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:47:17Z</updated>
<published>2011-05-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI and Enterprise Excellence: Presented to Lean Flight Initiative 4
Kenley, C. Robert
Lean Flight Initiative 4 Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Convergence of Expert Opinion via the Wideband Delphi Method: An Application in Cost Estimation Models</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84018" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84018</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:53:07Z</updated>
<published>2011-06-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Convergence of Expert Opinion via the Wideband Delphi Method: An Application in Cost Estimation Models
Valerdi, Ricardo
This paper discusses the notion of collective intelligence through the application of the Wideband Delphi method as a way to obtain convergence among a group of experts. The specific application is the definition and calibration of cost estimation models that use data collected from experts as part of their calibration. Convergence is important in this case because companies need to commit to cost estimates early in the planning cycle since so many other decisions are dependent on it. Our results demonstrate that, in most cases, convergence among experts can be achieved after three rounds of the Wideband Delphi.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-06-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84017" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Peck, Jordan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gaehde, Stephan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Benneyan, James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Graves, Stephen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84017</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T03:27:59Z</updated>
<published>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain
Peck, Jordan; Gaehde, Stephan; Benneyan, James; Graves, Stephen; Nightingale, Deborah
Often, in a health care delivery chain, lack of&#13;
coordination has been detrimental to timely, high quality&#13;
care. This paper focuses on the two steps of the hospital&#13;
health care delivery chain, an emergency department and a&#13;
hospital’s inpatient units. Past research into this chain has&#13;
suggested that early prediction of patient need for&#13;
admission can be used to better align flow between the two&#13;
departments. This chain and the nature of prediction in&#13;
health care delivery are discussed as well as a how&#13;
prediction may be useful in this context. Finally tools for&#13;
making admission predictions are tested and their possible&#13;
implications are explored. The results of this exploration&#13;
show that both expert opinion and a Naïve Bayesian&#13;
statistical approach have predictive value in this context.
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84016" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Peck, Jordan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84016</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T03:27:59Z</updated>
<published>2011-06-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Using Prediction to Improve Patient Flow in a Health Care Delivery Chain
Peck, Jordan
2011 Technology Management and Policy Graduate Consortium presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2011-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>It’s All Rocket Science: On the Equivalence of Development Timelines for Aerospace and Nuclear Technologies</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84015" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Crépin, Maxime</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kenley, C. Robert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>El-Khoury, Bernard</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84015</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:53:08Z</updated>
<published>2012-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">It’s All Rocket Science: On the Equivalence of Development Timelines for Aerospace and Nuclear Technologies
Crépin, Maxime; Kenley, C. Robert; El-Khoury, Bernard
Early in the lifecycle of a system development, systems engineers must execute&#13;
trade studies to allocate resources between different research and development efforts that are&#13;
developing technologies to be deployed into the system, and they must prepare risk&#13;
management plans for the selected technologies. We have been developing a statistical model&#13;
for schedule and cost uncertainty based on a small number of inputs that are quite objective&#13;
and are already integrated with technology readiness assessment. An algorithm that&#13;
transforms Technical Maturity (TM) scores from Department of Energy projects into a&#13;
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) score was created, allowing us to add data from a US&#13;
Department of Energy to an existing set of data from NASA. We statistically tested whether&#13;
the two samples (i.e. the DoE and NASA datasets) were randomly drawn from the same&#13;
population and concluded that the transition times for developing aerospace and nuclear&#13;
technologies are very similar.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Analysis of TRL-Based Cost and Schedule Models</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84014" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kenley, C. Robert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>El-Khoury, Bernard</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84014</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:53:08Z</updated>
<published>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Analysis of TRL-Based Cost and Schedule Models
Kenley, C. Robert; El-Khoury, Bernard
The GAO's, NASA's, and the DoD's adoption of the technology readiness level (TRL) scale to improve technology management has led to the emergence of many TRL-based models that are used to monitor technology maturation, mitigate technology program risk, characterize TRL transition times, or model schedule and cost risk for individual technologies, as well as technology systems and portfolios. In the first part of this paper, we develop a theoretical framework to classify those models based on the (often implicit) assumptions they make; we then propose modifications and alternative models to make full use of the assumptions. In the second part, we depart from those assumptions and present a new decision-based framework for cost and schedule joint modeling.
</summary>
<dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Agile Manufacturing and Customer- Supplier Relations in the Auto and Aircraft Industries</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83430" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Whitney, Daniel E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Fine, Charles H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83430</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:34Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Agile Manufacturing and Customer- Supplier Relations in the Auto and Aircraft Industries
Whitney, Daniel E.; Fine, Charles H.
Presentation on agile manufacturing and customer-supplier relations in auto and aircraft industries
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communications IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83429" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83429</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:33Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communications IPT
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Factory Operations Team</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83428" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83428</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:24:33Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Factory Operations Team
Shields, Tom
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Factory Operations Ford Electronics Benchmark</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83427" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Everett, Jim</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83427</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:16:13Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Factory Operations Ford Electronics Benchmark
Everett, Jim
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementation IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83426" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Packner, Mike</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Klein, Jan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cantrell, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83426</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:33Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementation IPT
Packner, Mike; Klein, Jan; Cantrell, John
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop conference
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Lean Enterprise Model “A Lean Enterprise Reference Tool”</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83425" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Aircraft Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83425</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:56Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Lean Enterprise Model “A Lean Enterprise Reference Tool”
Lean Aircraft Initiative
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizational Change</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83424" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Driscoll, Dave</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83424</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:56Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Organizational Change
Driscoll, Dave
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Policy and External Environment Program Instability</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83423" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83423</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T19:07:34Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Policy and External Environment Program Instability
Rebentisch, Eric S.
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supplier Integration Into Design and Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83422" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Deyst, John</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hoult, Dave</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83422</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:17Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Supplier Integration Into Design and Development
Bozdogan, Kirk; Deyst, John; Hoult, Dave
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Welcome and Introduction of New Members</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83421" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wesley L.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83421</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T19:03:47Z</updated>
<published>1996-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Welcome and Introduction of New Members
Harris, Wesley L.
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1996-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communications IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83420" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83420</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:56Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-09T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communications IPT
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Program Director Welcome</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83419" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83419</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:31:14Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Program Director Welcome
Murman, Earll
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Program Future Directions</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83418" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83418</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:03:52Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Program Future Directions
Murman, Earll
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Role of the Schedule Development Process</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83417" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McNutt, Capt Ross</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83417</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:46Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Role of the Schedule Development Process
McNutt, Capt Ross
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LEM IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83416" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Harmon, Ed</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Meadows, Don</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83416</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:17Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LEM IPT
Shields, Tom; Harmon, Ed; Meadows, Don
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Development Focus Group</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83415" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Grose, David L.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83415</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:42Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Development Focus Group
Grose, David L.
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementation IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83414" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83414</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:07Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementation IPT
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>System Producibility Analysis: Chains in Early Design Phases</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83413" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cunningham, Tim</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83413</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:26Z</updated>
<published>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">System Producibility Analysis: Chains in Early Design Phases
Cunningham, Tim
Presentation on system producibility
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cycle Time Reduction Using Design Structure Matrices</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83412" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83412</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:26Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cycle Time Reduction Using Design Structure Matrices
Browning, Tyson R.
Overview:&#13;
- Some cycle time reduction challenges&#13;
- Task-based design structure matrices (DSMs)&#13;
- How DSM method meets challenges&#13;
- Part 2: David Grose on applications at Boeing
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Development Team</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83410" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Deyst, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83410</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:57:31Z</updated>
<published>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Development Team
Deyst, John
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supplier Relations Focus Team Report</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83409" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83409</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:04:00Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Supplier Relations Focus Team Report
Bozdogan, Kirk
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Program Instability</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83408" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83408</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:42Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Program Instability
Rebentisch, Eric
Outline: &#13;
- Background&#13;
- Executive Board actions&#13;
- Data sources&#13;
- Policy recommendation topics&#13;
- Supporting data&#13;
- Summary
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Policy and External Environment Focus Team Report</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83407" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bodine, James F.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83407</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:07:46Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Policy and External Environment Focus Team Report
Bodine, James F.
Agenda:                                                                                                             - Introduction&#13;
- Program Instability Research&#13;
- Policy Team Program Instability&#13;
- Change Recommendations&#13;
- Economic Incentives Research&#13;
- Policy Team Economic Incentives&#13;
- Change Recommendations&#13;
- Path Forward
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product Development Focus Team</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83405" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Deyst, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83405</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:56Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product Development Focus Team
Deyst, John
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Factory Operations Focus Team</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83404" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83404</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:56:36Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Factory Operations Focus Team
Shields, Tom
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Economic Incentives Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83403" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wes</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83403</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:57:31Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Economic Incentives Research
Harris, Wes
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communications IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83402" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83402</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:57:31Z</updated>
<published>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communications IPT
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1997-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Introduction</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83400" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wesley L.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83400</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:04:00Z</updated>
<published>2007-03-05T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Introduction
Harris, Wesley L.
Lean Aircraft Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-03-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Implementation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83399" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83399</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Implementation
Nightingale, Debbie
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Three-Dimensional Concurrent Engineering: Clockspeed-based Principles for Product, Process, and Supply Chain Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83396" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fine, Prof. Charles</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83396</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:08Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Three-Dimensional Concurrent Engineering: Clockspeed-based Principles for Product, Process, and Supply Chain Development
Fine, Prof. Charles
I. Introduction &amp; Motivation&#13;
II. Fruit Flies &amp; Clockspeed&#13;
III. Supply Chain Design/Development matters&#13;
IV. 3-D Concurrency--an architectural approach&#13;
V. 3-D Concurrency--two at a time&#13;
VI. Conclusions
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communications IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83395" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83395</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:08Z</updated>
<published>1998-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communications IPT
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cycle Time Reduction through Integrated Supplier Networks: Overview and Introduction</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83394" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83394</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cycle Time Reduction through Integrated Supplier Networks: Overview and Introduction
Bozdogan, Kirk
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cycle Time Reduction with Part Synchronization</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83392" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83392</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:26Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cycle Time Reduction with Part Synchronization
Shields, Tom
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Policy Economic Incentives: C-17 Case Study</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83391" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wes</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83391</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T19:00:49Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Policy Economic Incentives: C-17 Case Study
Harris, Wes
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementation Workshop Highlights: Customer and Supplier Integration Across the Supply Chain</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83389" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83389</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:26Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementation Workshop Highlights: Customer and Supplier Integration Across the Supply Chain
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Key Characteristic Maturity Model</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83388" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ertan, Basak</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83388</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:14Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Key Characteristic Maturity Model
Ertan, Basak
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Sustainment Initiative Overview</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83387" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wes</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Brewer, Dan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83387</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:08Z</updated>
<published>1998-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Sustainment Initiative Overview
Harris, Wes; Brewer, Dan
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LEM IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83386" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bentley, Geoffrey</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83386</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:08Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LEM IPT
Nightingale, Debbie; Bentley, Geoffrey
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Workshop Wrap-up</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83384" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83384</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T18:52:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Workshop Wrap-up
Murman, Earll M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Program Director’s Welcome</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83383" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83383</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:14:19Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Program Director’s Welcome
Murman, Earll M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reaching Out to Commercial Suppliers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83381" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83381</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:12:20Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Reaching Out to Commercial Suppliers
Rebentisch, Eric
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integration of Space into LAI</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83380" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83380</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integration of Space into LAI
Warmkessel, Joyce M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Wrap-Up</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83379" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83379</id>
<updated>2019-04-14T07:16:58Z</updated>
<published>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Wrap-Up
Bozdogan, Kirk
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Design Methods in the Aerospace Industry: Looking for Evidence of Set-Based Methods</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83376" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bernstein, Joshua</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83376</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Design Methods in the Aerospace Industry: Looking for Evidence of Set-Based Methods
Bernstein, Joshua
Overview:&#13;
- Introduction                                                                                                          - What is set-based concurrent engineering&#13;
(SBCE)?&#13;
- Investigating aerospace industry design practices                                             - Lessons and recommendations
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Models for Analyzing Complex System Development Cost, Schedule, and Performance Risks</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83375" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Browning, Tyson R.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83375</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:06Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Models for Analyzing Complex System Development Cost, Schedule, and Performance Risks
Browning, Tyson R.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementation IPT</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83374" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83374</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:07Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementation IPT
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communicating Lean</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83373" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Everett, Jim</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Such, Robert</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83373</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:25Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communicating Lean
Everett, Jim; Such, Robert
Presentation on communicating lean
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Economic Incentives within Acquisition Reform: A Summary of Six Case Studies</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83372" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Wes</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83372</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:06Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Economic Incentives within Acquisition Reform: A Summary of Six Case Studies
Harris, Wes
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>R,D&amp;E and Product Development Metrics</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83371" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hauser, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83371</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:25Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">R,D&amp;E and Product Development Metrics
Hauser, John
Presentation on R,D&amp;E and Product Development
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Stream Mapping: An External Perspective</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83369" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Henderson, Prof. Rebecca</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83369</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T21:55:10Z</updated>
<published>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Stream Mapping: An External Perspective
Henderson, Prof. Rebecca
Presentation on value stream mapping
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>S70A Derivative Helicopters</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83368" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Holmes, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83368</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:04:57Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">S70A Derivative Helicopters
Holmes, Chris
Overview:&#13;
– Define system architecture                                                                             &#13;
– Relation to helicopters&#13;
– Hypothesis
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Causes and Impacts of Engineering Changes</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83367" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hsu, Ted</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83367</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:06Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Causes and Impacts of Engineering Changes
Hsu, Ted
Lean Aerospace Initiative Product Development &amp; Supplier Relations Focus Teams
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Product and Technology Development Through Strategic Alliances With Suppliers</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83365" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fealing, Prof. Kaye Husbands</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83365</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:05Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Product and Technology Development Through Strategic Alliances With Suppliers
Fealing, Prof. Kaye Husbands
Presentation on the role of strategic alliances in product and technology development
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Identifying the Product Development Value Stream</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83363" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83363</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:41:25Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Identifying the Product Development Value Stream
McManus, Hugh
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Welcome and Theme Introduction</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83362" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83362</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:01:37Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Welcome and Theme Introduction
Murman, Earll M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Transition to Lean Module</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83360" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83360</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:06Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Transition to Lean Module
Nightingale, Debbie
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Production System Implementation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83358" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Reynal, Vicente</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83358</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:25Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Production System Implementation
Reynal, Vicente
Presentation on production system implementation in low volume/medium mix non-aerospace company
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Communicating Lean</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83357" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83357</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:05Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Communicating Lean
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop conference
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Introduction to Product Value Stream</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83356" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83356</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:05Z</updated>
<published>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Introduction to Product Value Stream
Warmkessel, Joyce M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop conference
</summary>
<dc:date>1998-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Bringing Down Barriers: Communicating a Vision</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83354" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Silviano, Deneen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83354</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:51:46Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Bringing Down Barriers: Communicating a Vision
Silviano, Deneen
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop conference
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Transition-To-Lean Pilot Project</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83353" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83353</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:59:09Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Transition-To-Lean Pilot Project
Nightingale, Debbie
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Welcome and Theme Introduction</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83351" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83351</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:05Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Welcome and Theme Introduction
Murman, Earll M.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Making Lean Work for People</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83350" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kochan, Thomas A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83350</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T19:18:37Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Making Lean Work for People
Kochan, Thomas A.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Looking Forward to Phase III</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83348" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Harris, Cliff</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83348</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:24Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Looking Forward to Phase III
Harris, Cliff
Lean Aerospace Initiative Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Coordination Strategies for the Lean Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83347" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83347</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:26Z</updated>
<published>1999-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Coordination Strategies for the Lean Enterprise
Bozdogan, Kirk
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Workshop presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>1999-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enhancing Enterprise Value: Welcome and LAI Overview</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83346" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83346</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:24:45Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enhancing Enterprise Value: Welcome and LAI Overview
Murman, Earll
An LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enhancing Enterprise Value: Value to Investors</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83345" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Myers, Stewart C.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83345</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:24Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enhancing Enterprise Value: Value to Investors
Myers, Stewart C.
An LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enhancing Enterprise Value: Creating Value Across The Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83344" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Pitts, James F.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83344</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:24:48Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enhancing Enterprise Value: Creating Value Across The Enterprise
Pitts, James F.
An LAI Plenary Conference
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Model</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83343" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bentley, Goeff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Taneja, Abhinav</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83343</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:24Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Model
Bentley, Goeff; Nightingale, Debbie; Taneja, Abhinav
Presentation on LEM
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Knowledgemediaries</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83342" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Taneja, Abhi</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83342</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:59:11Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Knowledgemediaries
Taneja, Abhi
Agenda:                                                                                                             - Overview of IT Industry&#13;
- Knowledge Management v/s&#13;
- Knowledgemediaries&#13;
- Concept of Knowledgemediaries&#13;
- 4 C’s of Knowledgemediaries&#13;
- Case Studies&#13;
- Technologies
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enhancing Enterprise Value: A Multidimensional Value Framework</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83341" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce M.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83341</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:54:21Z</updated>
<published>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enhancing Enterprise Value: A Multidimensional Value Framework
Warmkessel, Joyce M.
An LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2000-03-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lifecycle Value Framework for Tactical Aircraft Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83340" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hallander, Ingrid</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83340</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:36:57Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lifecycle Value Framework for Tactical Aircraft Product Development
Hallander, Ingrid; Stanke, Alexis
This paper is a draft version of the forthcoming publication in the Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Symposium of INCOSE (July 2001).
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83339" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83339</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T21:24:48Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Stanke, Alexis
A Framework for Achieving Best Lifecycle Value
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83338" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83338</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T09:13:56Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Shields, Tom
Production Operations Transition-to-Lean
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83337" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Scott, Rob</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83337</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T15:42:12Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Scott, Rob
Aerospace Employment and Skills: Past Performance and Future Projections
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Summary of Research Conducted by the Manufacturing Systems Team</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83336" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gutowski, Prof. Timothy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shields, J. Thomas</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Vaughn, Mandy</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83336</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:51Z</updated>
<published>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Summary of Research Conducted by the Manufacturing Systems Team
Gutowski, Prof. Timothy; Shields, J. Thomas; Vaughn, Mandy
The Manufacturing Systems team is one of the focus groups within the Lean Aerospace&#13;
Initiative whose goal is to document, analyze and communicate the design attributes and&#13;
relationships that lead to significant performance improvements in manufacturing&#13;
systems in the defense aerospace industry. This paper will provide a usable record of&#13;
what work has been done by the Manufacturing Systems team and it is aimed at releasing&#13;
research conducted by the LAI in the field of manufacturing systems.&#13;
The purpose of this paper is to present the research conducted by the Manufacturing&#13;
Systems team in the framework provided by the Transition-To-Lean Roadmap. The&#13;
research results are presented briefly within this framework and each phase of the paper&#13;
ends with and extensive list of resources for further reference.
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83335" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83335</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:12:33Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-12T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Nightingale, Deborah
Enterprise Transition to Lean Roadmap
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83334" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83334</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T19:17:47Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Nightingale, Deborah
LESAT - Lean Enterprise Self-Assessment Tool
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83333" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83333</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:59:14Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Shields, Tom
Manufacturing System Design: An Overview
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83332" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83332</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:32:11Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Rebentisch, Eric
Organizing for Subsystem Commonality
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83331" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83331</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:37Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Rebentisch, Eric
Managing Subsystem Commonality
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83330" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Millard, Rich</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83330</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:30:47Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Millard, Rich
PD VS Analysis and Mapping Tools
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83329" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83329</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:37Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
McManus, Hugh
Breakout Session: Understanding the Product Development Value Stream
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Inventing the Organizations of the New Economy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83328" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Malone, Thomas W.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83328</id>
<updated>2019-04-08T08:20:50Z</updated>
<published>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Inventing the Organizations of the New Economy
Malone, Thomas W.
Presentation on inventing the organizations of the new economy
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83327" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Harmon, Ed</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83327</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:04:38Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
McManus, Hugh; Harmon, Ed
Lean Product Development Definitions and Concepts
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Manufacturing System Design / Manufacturing Strategy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83326" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Advancement Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83326</id>
<updated>2019-04-08T08:18:31Z</updated>
<published>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Manufacturing System Design / Manufacturing Strategy
Lean Advancement Initiative
Presentation on manufacturing system design
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Three Views of Product Development Complexity</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83325" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Eppinger, Steven D.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83325</id>
<updated>2019-04-08T07:33:19Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Three Views of Product Development Complexity
Eppinger, Steven D.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83324" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Deyst, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83324</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T12:53:13Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Deyst, John
Understanding Risk and Uncertainty
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Growing the Lean Community</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83323" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83323</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T09:13:22Z</updated>
<published>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Growing the Lean Community
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel
Creativity and Adult Learning Principles
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-04-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83322" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shah, Nirav</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Davidz, Heidi</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83322</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:55Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Shah, Nirav; Davidz, Heidi
LEAP - Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83321" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83321</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:03Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Nightingale, Debbie
Presentation on the lean aerospace journey
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83320" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vaughn, Mandy</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83320</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:23Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Vaughn, Mandy
Product Realization in the Defense Aerospace Industry
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83319" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83319</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:11:22Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Stanke, Alexis
Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs, F-16 Case Study
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83318" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83318</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:14:12Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Rebentisch, Eric
Managing Intellectual Capital for the Long Haul
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LESAT Implementation Breakout Session</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83317" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mize, Joe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hallam, Cory</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83317</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:45:35Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LESAT Implementation Breakout Session
Mize, Joe; Hallam, Cory
LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>New Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design: Space Systems, Policy, and Architecture Research Consortium (SSPARC) Program Overview</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83316" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83316</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:02Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">New Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design: Space Systems, Policy, and Architecture Research Consortium (SSPARC) Program Overview
McManus, Hugh; Warmkessel, Joyce
Presentation on SSPARC program
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83315" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hitchings, Sean</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83315</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:02Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Hitchings, Sean
Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs, Atlas Case Study
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83314" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Blake, Don A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83314</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:02Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Blake, Don A.
Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs, Boeing 737 Fuselage, Comments and Insights
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83313" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hallam, Cory R. A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83313</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:01Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Hallam, Cory R. A.
LESAT Actions in Industry
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83312" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ferdowsi, Bobak</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83312</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:36:57Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Ferdowsi, Bobak
Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs, Boeing 737 Fuselage
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83311" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Davidz, Heidi</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83311</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:01Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Davidz, Heidi
Lean Effects on Aerospace Programs, Raytheon AMRAAM Case Study
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizing for Product Development and Transfer to Manufacturing</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83310" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Allen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83310</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:45:34Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Organizing for Product Development and Transfer to Manufacturing
Allen
Presentation on product development and manufacturing
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Creation in Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83309" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Warmkessel, Joyce</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83309</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:45:32Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Creation in Product Development
Warmkessel, Joyce
"Value Creation Through Integration," LAI Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A Framework for Integration from the Manufacturing Perspective</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83308" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83308</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T05:33:22Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Framework for Integration from the Manufacturing Perspective
Shields, Tom
"Value Creation Through Integration," LAI Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integration - Framing</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83307" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83307</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:01Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integration - Framing
Shields, Tom
"Value Creation Through Integration," LAI Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Supplier Networks Perspective</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83306" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83306</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:15:00Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Supplier Networks Perspective
Bozdogan, Kirk
"Value Creation Through Integration," LAI Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Creating Value Through Integration: Valuation Techniques for Complex Space Systems</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83305" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McVey, Michelle</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83305</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:14:00Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Creating Value Through Integration: Valuation Techniques for Complex Space Systems
McVey, Michelle
Presentation on valuation techniques for complex space systems
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Creating Value Through Integration: Valuation Techniques for Commercial Aircraft Program Design</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83304" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Markish, Jacob</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83304</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:11Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Creating Value Through Integration: Valuation Techniques for Commercial Aircraft Program Design
Markish, Jacob
Presentation on valuation techniques for commercial aircraft program design
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fostering Innovation Across Aerospace Supplier Networks</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83303" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kirtley, Aaron</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83303</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:11Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Fostering Innovation Across Aerospace Supplier Networks
Kirtley, Aaron
“Value Creation Through Integration," LAI Workshop, Fort Worth, TX
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Creation in the Product Development Process</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83302" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Chase, Jim</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83302</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:10Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Creation in the Product Development Process
Chase, Jim
LAI Product Development Workshop
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Opportunities for Lean Thinking in Aircraft Flight Testing &amp; Evaluation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83301" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carreras, Carmen</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83301</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:10Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Opportunities for Lean Thinking in Aircraft Flight Testing &amp; Evaluation
Carreras, Carmen
LAI Joint Workshop “Value Creation Through Integration”
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Creation Though Integration: A Holistic Approach to the Design of Assembly Operations for Defense Aerospace Products</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83300" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vaughn, Mandy</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83300</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:55Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Creation Though Integration: A Holistic Approach to the Design of Assembly Operations for Defense Aerospace Products
Vaughn, Mandy
Presentation on value creation in assembly operations for defense aerospace products
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Value Creation Through Integration Workshop</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83299" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Millard, Rich</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83299</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T01:45:22Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Value Creation Through Integration Workshop
McManus, Hugh; Millard, Rich
Value Stream Analysis and Mapping for PD
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizing for Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83298" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Allen, Thomas J.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83298</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:14:00Z</updated>
<published>2001-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Organizing for Product Development
Allen, Thomas J.
In this paper, we propose four parameters that determine appropriate organizational structure for a research, development or engineering organization. Examining the positions that an organization occupies on the four parameters will determine relative need for interaction with the market and with supporting technologies as well as the need for coordination among project team members. This, along with the time needed to bring the product to market, can then be translated into an organizational structure, giving proper emphases to each of the three needs.
</summary>
<dc:date>2001-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Cross Functional Teaming and Collaboration</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83297" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Allen, Tom</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83297</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:55Z</updated>
<published>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Cross Functional Teaming and Collaboration
Allen, Tom
Presentation on cross functional teaming and collaboration
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-01-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83296" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gaskins, Kathern</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cool, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83296</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:09Z</updated>
<published>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Value: The New Lean Horizon
Nightingale, Debbie; Gaskins, Kathern; Cool, Chris
Future Vision: The Lean Enterprise Value Phase
</summary>
<dc:date>2002-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Educational Network Panel</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83295" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lewis, Dick</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83295</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:54Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Educational Network Panel
Lewis, Dick
Presentation on education network panel
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Evolutionary Strategies in Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83294" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ferdowsi, Bobak</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83294</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:08Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Evolutionary Strategies in Product Development
Ferdowsi, Bobak
Presentation on product development evolutionary strategies
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Pioneering the Future of Aerospace: Focusing On the Total Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83293" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83293</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:53Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Pioneering the Future of Aerospace: Focusing On the Total Enterprise
Nightingale, Debbie
Presentation on the total enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Aerospace Initiative Annual Symposium</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83292" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tondreault, Jeremy</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83292</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:52Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Aerospace Initiative Annual Symposium
Tondreault, Jeremy
Overview:&#13;
• Thesis perspective, problem statement, objectives and premise&#13;
• Source data&#13;
• Key Variables&#13;
– Cost as a design requirement&#13;
– Role of integrating downstream knowledge&#13;
– Development methodology&#13;
– Role of requirements&#13;
• Summary
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Budgeting for Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83291" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Spaulding, Tim</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83291</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:52Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Budgeting for Evolutionary Acquisition and Spiral Development
Spaulding, Tim
Presentation on evolutionary acquisition and spiral development
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Implementation of IT Tools and Their Processes</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83290" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hines, Eriska K.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83290</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:17:08Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Implementation of IT Tools and Their Processes
Hines, Eriska K.
Presentation on IT tools implementation
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Graduate Education: Integrating Research, Curriculum and Practice</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83289" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83289</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:20Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Graduate Education: Integrating Research, Curriculum and Practice
Murman, Earll
Presentation on graduate education
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Value Simulation Game</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83288" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83288</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:25Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Value Simulation Game
McManus, Hugh; Rebentisch, Eric
The Game:&#13;
• A simulation of a complex aerospace&#13;
enterprise&#13;
• Philosophy draws heavily on LAI&#13;
research and the recent book Lean&#13;
Enterprise Value&#13;
• Content and cases based on LAI&#13;
member experience&#13;
• Integrated with lecture material to&#13;
provide intellectual basis, tools, and&#13;
experiential learning
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Role of System Representation and Collaboration in Design: Why Are Some Programs More Adaptable than Others?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83287" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dare, Lt. Col. Rob</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83287</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:02Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Role of System Representation and Collaboration in Design: Why Are Some Programs More Adaptable than Others?
Dare, Lt. Col. Rob
Agenda: &#13;
• Why are Some Programs More Adaptable than&#13;
Others?&#13;
• Research Method and Definitions&#13;
• System Representations&#13;
• Collaborative Stakeholder Roles&#13;
• Recommendations for practitioners
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Willingness to Change: Transformation through Innovation and Risk-taking Part II</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83286" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83286</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T07:16:10Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Willingness to Change: Transformation through Innovation and Risk-taking Part II
Roth, George
Presentation on achieving transformation through innovation and risk-taking
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Willingness to Change: Transformation through Innovation and Risk-taking Part I</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83285" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83285</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:48Z</updated>
<published>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Willingness to Change: Transformation through Innovation and Risk-taking Part I
Roth, George
Presentation on achieving transformation through innovation and risk-taking
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Multi-Platform Thinking: Integrating the Lean Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83284" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Haddad, Marc</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83284</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:02Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-27T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Multi-Platform Thinking: Integrating the Lean Enterprise
Haddad, Marc
Presentation on integrating the lean enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Transformation: Measuring and Accelerating the Transition to Lean</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83283" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hallam, Cory R. A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83283</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:11Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Transformation: Measuring and Accelerating the Transition to Lean
Hallam, Cory R. A.
Presentation Outline:&#13;
• Research Objectives&#13;
• Strategic Value of the Lean Enterprise&#13;
• Multi-Stakeholder Value Optimization&#13;
• Lean Enterprise Self-Assessment Tool (LESAT)&#13;
• Leading and Lagging Indicators of Lean Enterprise&#13;
Transformation&#13;
• Empirical Results in the Aerospace Industry&#13;
• Accelerating the Lean Transformation - Linking LESAT&#13;
to Strategic Objectives&#13;
• Summary and Questions
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Pursuit of Acquisition Intrapreneurs</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83282" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Forseth, Major Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83282</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:01Z</updated>
<published>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Pursuit of Acquisition Intrapreneurs
Forseth, Major Chris
Presentation on acquisition intrapreneur traits
</summary>
<dc:date>2003-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>C-130 Production at Warner Robins ALC: Lean Change at a Crossroads</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83281" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dickmann, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83281</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:39Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">C-130 Production at Warner Robins ALC: Lean Change at a Crossroads
Dickmann, John
Outline: &#13;
• What is a C-130?&#13;
• Lean timeline in C-130 PDM&#13;
• Lean results in C-130&#13;
• Successes and Challenges
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Team Learning Strategies for Enterprise Transformation: The Case of Vicarious Learning</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83280" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bresman, Henrik</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83280</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T21:11:47Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Team Learning Strategies for Enterprise Transformation: The Case of Vicarious Learning
Bresman, Henrik
Presentation on vicarious team learning for enterprise transformation
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Transformation at Warner Robins ALC: The Buy Purchase Request Process</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83279" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cohen, Jessica L.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Walker, Tina</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83279</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:15Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Transformation at Warner Robins ALC: The Buy Purchase Request Process
Cohen, Jessica L.; Walker, Tina
Presentation on the buy purchase request process at Warner Robins ALC
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How Can You Train Lean Enterprise Leaders?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83278" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Advancement Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83278</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:20Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">How Can You Train Lean Enterprise Leaders?
Lean Advancement Initiative
Lean Enterprise Value Simulation game
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sustaining Learning and Change</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83277" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Advancement Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83277</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:08:01Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Sustaining Learning and Change
Lean Advancement Initiative
Capability-based model of reinforcing and balancing forces
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Success Breakout Sessions</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83276" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Advancement Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83276</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:15Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Success Breakout Sessions
Lean Advancement Initiative
Overview of sessions, dialogue for learning
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Session on Revitalizing Systems Engineering</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83275" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Dr. Donna H.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83275</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T07:29:15Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Session on Revitalizing Systems Engineering
Rhodes, Dr. Donna H.
LAI 2004 Plenary Conference presentation agenda
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Road Forward – Making Lean Enterprise Transformation Happen!</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83274" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83274</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:21Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Road Forward – Making Lean Enterprise Transformation Happen!
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI Consortium’s Role in Enterprise Transformation: Making It Happen</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83273" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83273</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:07:57Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI Consortium’s Role in Enterprise Transformation: Making It Happen
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Success Breakout Session A: Industry-Government Infrastructure</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83272" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Jobo, Ron</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kraft, Ed</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83272</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:28:13Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Success Breakout Session A: Industry-Government Infrastructure
Jobo, Ron; Kraft, Ed; Roth, George
Breakout session on industry-government infrastructure
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>C-5 Journey into Lean Workforce Aspects</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83271" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Fraile, Lydia</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83271</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:21Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">C-5 Journey into Lean Workforce Aspects
Fraile, Lydia
Presentation on C-5 journey into lean
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>What Progress Have We Made So Far With Evolutionary Development?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83270" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83270</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:24:02Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">What Progress Have We Made So Far With Evolutionary Development?
Rebentisch, Eric
Evolutionary development progress poster
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Transition-To-Lean Roadmap</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83269" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Advancement Initiative</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83269</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:55Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Transition-To-Lean Roadmap
Lean Advancement Initiative
Enterprise TTL Roadmap
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Making Lean Stick</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83268" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Klein, Jan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83268</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:55Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Making Lean Stick
Klein, Jan
Presentation on achieving true change
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Transformation: Building the Infrastructure</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83267" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carroll, Dr. John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83267</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:11Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Transformation: Building the Infrastructure
Carroll, Dr. John
Plenary Wrap-Up Lessons Learned
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Improving Complex Enterprises with System Models</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83266" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hemann, Justin</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83266</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:27Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Improving Complex Enterprises with System Models
Hemann, Justin
Thumbnail sketch of defense sustainment
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>United States Air Force Air Logistics Centers: Lean Enterprise Transformation and Associated Capabilities</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83265" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cohen, Jessica Lauren</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83265</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:11Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">United States Air Force Air Logistics Centers: Lean Enterprise Transformation and Associated Capabilities
Cohen, Jessica Lauren
Presentation on lean enterprise transformation in the United States Air Force Air Logistics Centers
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Emerging Theory for Lean Enterprise Chain</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83264" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83264</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:28Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Emerging Theory for Lean Enterprise Chain
Roth, George
Presentation on lean enterprise change
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Sustaining Lean Change Working Group</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83263" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83263</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:03:59Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Sustaining Lean Change Working Group
Roth, George
Presentation on sustaining lean change
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Lean Supply Chain Now Pilot Demonstration Project</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83262" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Akhbari, Hamid</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Darden, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83262</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:27Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Lean Supply Chain Now Pilot Demonstration Project
Bozdogan, Kirk; Akhbari, Hamid; Darden, Chris
Supplier Networks Working Group
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Building the Lean Extended Enterprise through Adaptive Supply Chain Networks</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83261" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shaw, Thomas E.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Burton, Terence T.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83261</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T07:16:10Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Building the Lean Extended Enterprise through Adaptive Supply Chain Networks
Shaw, Thomas E.; Burton, Terence T.
Agenda:&#13;
• A&amp;D Lean transformation issues&#13;
• Supplier issues&#13;
• Supply chain network management issues&#13;
• An IT architecture for supply network integration and&#13;
management---illustrative example&#13;
• SAP Netweaver application platform&#13;
• A&amp;D Netweaver application example- Bombardier&#13;
• Summary
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Breakout Session: Topics in Supply Chain Management</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83260" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83260</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:09:27Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Breakout Session: Topics in Supply Chain Management
Bozdogan, Kirk
Session Overview:&#13;
• Session: Topics in Supply Chain Management&#13;
• Session Lead: Kirk Bozdogan (MIT)&#13;
• Date: March 24, 2005&#13;
• Time: 8:00 - 12:00 PM&#13;
• Room: Dana VI
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Role of IT in Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83255" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83255</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:06Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Role of IT in Enterprise Transformation
Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
• A brief history of Computing&#13;
• Deciphering the Alphabet Soup&#13;
• Strategic Frontiers&#13;
- Information Systems&#13;
- Enterprise Architecture&#13;
- Software Development
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enabling Lean Enterprise Transformation Through IT The PDM Example</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83254" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hines, Eriska K.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83254</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T06:14:14Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enabling Lean Enterprise Transformation Through IT The PDM Example
Hines, Eriska K.; Shields, Tom; Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
Overview:&#13;
• Context&#13;
• Research Design&#13;
• Results&#13;
• Implications for Lean&#13;
• Lessons Learned&#13;
• Conclusions
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Textron Systems Sensor Fuzed Weapon VSM Event: Using LAI Tools to Transform a Program Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83252" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bentley, Geoffrey</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83252</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:34Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Textron Systems Sensor Fuzed Weapon VSM Event: Using LAI Tools to Transform a Program Enterprise
McManus, Hugh; Bentley, Geoffrey
LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Breakout Session: Change Methodology, Planning and Standardization (Session II)</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83251" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83251</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:21Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Breakout Session: Change Methodology, Planning and Standardization (Session II)
Bozdogan, Kirk
Session Overview:&#13;
• Session: Change Methodology, Planning &amp;&#13;
Standardization (Session II)&#13;
• Session Lead: Kirk Bozdogan (MIT)&#13;
• Date: March 23, 2005&#13;
• Time: 1:15 - 5:15 PM&#13;
• Room: Dana VI
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Impact of Knowledge Management Tools as Integrating Mechanisms</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83250" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Taylor, LT Aaron</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83250</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:58:04Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Impact of Knowledge Management Tools as Integrating Mechanisms
Taylor, LT Aaron
A DD(X) Case Study
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Designing the Lean Enterprise Performance Measurement System</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83249" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Mahidhar, Vikram</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83249</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:23Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Designing the Lean Enterprise Performance Measurement System
Mahidhar, Vikram
Agenda:&#13;
•Metrics Team Challenge from LAI Executive Board&#13;
•Metrics and Lean Transformation&#13;
•Research Objective&#13;
•Theory and current practices&#13;
•Gaps in current practices&#13;
•Conceptual Lean Enterprise Performance Measurement System&#13;
•Data Collection and Analysis
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Transformation: Ogden ALC Case Study</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83248" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Christopherson, Timothy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83248</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T15:36:06Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-03T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Transformation: Ogden ALC Case Study
Christopherson, Timothy; Stanke, Alexis
Overview:&#13;
• Developing a strategy for enterprise transformation&#13;
• Building capability for managing change&#13;
• Learning and results
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizational Design Choices in Lean Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83246" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83246</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T17:59:25Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Organizational Design Choices in Lean Transformation
Roth, George
Panel session, presentation on organizational design
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI Today and Tomorrow</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83244" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83244</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:23Z</updated>
<published>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI Today and Tomorrow
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
Agenda: &#13;
•Highlights Since Last Plenary&#13;
•Future Direction for Phase V&#13;
•Conference Highlights
</summary>
<dc:date>2005-03-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Transformation: Closing the Gap Between Knowledge and Implementation: Lessons Learned on Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83243" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carroll, Prof. John S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83243</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T18:51:46Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Transformation: Closing the Gap Between Knowledge and Implementation: Lessons Learned on Enterprise Transformation
Carroll, Prof. John S.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83242" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sheffi, Yossi</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83242</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:16Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage
Sheffi, Yossi
Presentation on overcoming vulnerability in the enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Partnering for Enterprise Excellence</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83241" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83241</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:16Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Partnering for Enterprise Excellence
Nightingale, Prof. Debbie
2007 LAI Conference opening presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Design and Exercise of Flexibility in a Blended Wing Body (BWB) Type Aircraft</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83240" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McConnell, Joshua</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83240</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:23Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Design and Exercise of Flexibility in a Blended Wing Body (BWB) Type Aircraft
McConnell, Joshua
LAI Plenary Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Strategies in Enterprise Ecology: Symbiotic Models for Commercial Aviation as an Enterprise of Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83239" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sgouridis, Sgouris</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sussman, Prof. Joseph</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83239</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:23:03Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Strategies in Enterprise Ecology: Symbiotic Models for Commercial Aviation as an Enterprise of Enterprises
Sgouridis, Sgouris; Sussman, Prof. Joseph
Agenda: &#13;
• Hypotheses&#13;
• Background&#13;
– Commercial Aviation Cycles&#13;
– Enterprises and business cycles&#13;
• A framework: Enterprise of Enterprises&#13;
• Modeling Enterprise of Enterprises&#13;
• Countercyclical strategies and symbiosis
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding and Modeling Interaction Effects in Complex Engineering Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83238" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Christopher</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83238</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:15Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding and Modeling Interaction Effects in Complex Engineering Enterprises
Glazner, Christopher
Agenda: &#13;
• Overview of the problem&#13;
• Hypotheses&#13;
• Enterprise-level interactions&#13;
• Useful modeling approaches&#13;
• Next Steps
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Architecture Modeling, Design and Transformation: Defining the Missing Links</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83236" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83236</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:22Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Architecture Modeling, Design and Transformation: Defining the Missing Links
Bozdogan, Kirk
Outline - &#13;
• Propose a unifying conceptual framework guiding the&#13;
“front-end” of planned enterprise change (transformation)&#13;
management process&#13;
• Enterprise architecture design process (enterprise architecting)&#13;
• Choice of enterprise architecture for emphasis&#13;
• Enterprise architecture modeling strategies&#13;
• Transition moves available for enterprise transformation&#13;
• Show how the framework links together a number of the&#13;
key design decisions that need to be considered&#13;
simultaneously, under alternative combinations of major&#13;
contingency conditions
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Challenges in Aerospace IT: The CIO Perspective</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83235" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83235</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:35Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Challenges in Aerospace IT: The CIO Perspective
Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"
Agenda - &#13;
• Motivation&#13;
• Research Methodology&#13;
• Key Findings&#13;
• Going Forward
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Comparative Analysis of Supply Chain Management Practices by Boeing and Airbus: Long-Term Strategic Implications</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83234" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Horng, Tzu-Ching</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Kirk</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83234</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:21Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Comparative Analysis of Supply Chain Management Practices by Boeing and Airbus: Long-Term Strategic Implications
Horng, Tzu-Ching; Bozdogan, Kirk
Research Goals and Approach:&#13;
Goals - &#13;
• Develop an improved understanding of emerging supply chain management&#13;
strategies and practices in the commercial aerospace industry&#13;
• Explore the longer-term implications of the findings for supply chain management&#13;
practices in the aerospace industry in the future/&#13;
Approach - &#13;
• Conduct a comparative analysis of supply chain management practices by Boeing&#13;
and Airbus &#13;
• Focus on two large development programs -- the Boeing 787 Dreamliner and the&#13;
Airbus A380 Navigator&#13;
• Concentrate on the common set of suppliers supporting both programs to develop a&#13;
sharp “compare-and contrast” perspective, looking at Boeing &amp; Airbus from the&#13;
vantage point of these common suppliers&#13;
• Capture bottom-up “supplier’s voice” to complement “top-down” perspective, while&#13;
controlling for any “embellished” top-down view from the two companies
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Exploring the Architecture of Combat Air Operations: Insights into Flexibility in Enterprise Architectures and Implications for System Architecture and Acquisition</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83232" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dickmann, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83232</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:47Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-11T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Exploring the Architecture of Combat Air Operations: Insights into Flexibility in Enterprise Architectures and Implications for System Architecture and Acquisition
Dickmann, John
• Question:&#13;
– How do we design enterprises and large-scale systems for&#13;
flexibility?&#13;
• Hypothesis:&#13;
– Enterprise and technical system architectures with more&#13;
lateral vs. vertical connections will perform better in dynamic&#13;
and uncertain environments, both operational and&#13;
acquisition&#13;
• Goals:&#13;
– Architectural analysis at enterprise level to see whether a&#13;
shift from an architecture dominated by vertical connections&#13;
to one dominated by lateral connections enables an&#13;
enterprise to achieve greater flexibility.&#13;
– Associate this shift to performance&#13;
– “First Order” modeling and analysis
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>From Good To Lean: The Bottom Line Impact of Enterprise Lean Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83231" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Noel</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83231</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:47Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">From Good To Lean: The Bottom Line Impact of Enterprise Lean Transformation
Valerdi, Ricardo; Srinivasan, Jayakanth "JK"; Nightingale, Noel
LAI Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Measuring the Efficiency of Commonality Implementation: Application to Commercial Aircraft Cockpits</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83229" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bador, Damien P.M.D.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Seering, Warren J.</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83229</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:22Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Measuring the Efficiency of Commonality Implementation: Application to Commercial Aircraft Cockpits
Bador, Damien P.M.D.; Seering, Warren J.; Rebentisch, Eric S.
Increasing commonality across their models allows commercial aircraft manufacturers to reduce the&#13;
product development cycle time and tailor their models to their customers’ needs. The cockpit is an&#13;
area where commonality is thought to be particularly desirable, since it also simplifies the pilots&#13;
training process for the airline companies. However, no set of metrics is currently able to measure the&#13;
efficiency of commonality application at this level from a total lifecycle standpoint.&#13;
In this paper, we propose a set of metrics adapted to large commercial aircraft and taking into account&#13;
the main parts of the product lifecycle. The concept of lead time is central in our measurement of&#13;
commonality, as it strongly influences the value of the aircraft for all primary stakeholders. We&#13;
examine the extent to which these metrics are independent from aircraft particularities (such as&#13;
physical dimensions). We indicate their limitations and what additional research should be performed&#13;
to obtain a set of metrics able to measure the efficiency of commonality implementation for the whole&#13;
aircraft.&#13;
We use the example of two competing medium-haul aircraft families to test our set of metrics. We&#13;
evaluate the efficiency of commonality according to our metrics and we compare with field results&#13;
obtained from the manufacturers’ studies and from the results of interviews of airlines pilots. We&#13;
show how our set
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: The Lean Link</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83228" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Twomey Lamb, Caroline</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83228</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:55:49Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Promoting Collaborative Systems Thinking Through the Alignment of Culture and Process: The Lean Link
Twomey Lamb, Caroline
Agenda&#13;
• Motivation&#13;
• Research Framework&#13;
• Key Constructs&#13;
• Objectives&#13;
• Research Methods&#13;
• Current Progress&#13;
• Next Steps
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Performing Collaborative, Distributed Systems Engineering (CDSE) Lessons Learned from CDSE Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83227" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Utter, Darlene A.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83227</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:35Z</updated>
<published>2007-02-28T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Performing Collaborative, Distributed Systems Engineering (CDSE) Lessons Learned from CDSE Enterprises
Utter, Darlene A.
LAI Research Seminar presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-02-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enterprise Product Development Simulation and Short Course - A Summary</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83225" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83225</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T19:54:05Z</updated>
<published>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enterprise Product Development Simulation and Short Course - A Summary
McManus, Hugh; Rebentisch, Eric
Presentation on lean enterprise product development
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI EdNet and Lean Systems Engineering</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83224" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83224</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:35Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI EdNet and Lean Systems Engineering
Murman, Earll
Presentation on LAI EdNet
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI Lean Product Development Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83222" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83222</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T15:46:10Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI Lean Product Development Research
Rebentisch, Eric
Presentation on LAI lean product development research
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Product Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83221" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83221</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:34Z</updated>
<published>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Product Development
Rebentisch, Eric
Overview&#13;
• Lean PD—is it making a difference?&#13;
• How Toyota does product development&#13;
• Current evidence of Lean in PD in aerospace&#13;
• Extending lean to the PD system level
</summary>
<dc:date>2007-04-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Leading the Lean Enterprise: The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83220" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carroll, Prof. John S.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83220</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:21Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Leading the Lean Enterprise: The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership
Carroll, Prof. John S.
Lean Aerospace Initiative Plenary Conference presentation, Lessons Learned on Distributed Leadership
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Understanding Industrial Ecology Dynamics and Competitive Enterprise Strategies in the Large Commercial Aircraft Industry: Hybrid Agent-Based Systems Dynamics Simulation as a Tool for Architecting the Extended Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83216" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sgouridis, Sgouris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83216</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T20:12:19Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Understanding Industrial Ecology Dynamics and Competitive Enterprise Strategies in the Large Commercial Aircraft Industry: Hybrid Agent-Based Systems Dynamics Simulation as a Tool for Architecting the Extended Enterprise
Sgouridis, Sgouris
Agenda&#13;
• The Aviation Industry Ecosystem&#13;
• Why model the aviation industry?&#13;
• Methods: existing models and&#13;
frameworks&#13;
• The hybrid agent-based System&#13;
Dynamics modeling approach&#13;
• Expected Value
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Dynamics of Enterprise and Technical System Architectures: Early insights from Combat Air Operations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83214" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Dickmann, John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83214</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:02:25Z</updated>
<published>2006-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Dynamics of Enterprise and Technical System Architectures: Early insights from Combat Air Operations
Dickmann, John
Presentation on dynamics of enterprise and technical system architectures
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Design and Exercise of Flexibility in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83213" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McConnell, Joshua</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83213</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:47Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Design and Exercise of Flexibility in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner
McConnell, Joshua
LAI Plenary Conference presentation, Enterprise Architectures: Emerging Ideas
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integration Strategies Across Enterprise Networks: Applications to Enterprise Architecting with Examples Drawn from the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Enterprise Network</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83212" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Chris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83212</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T12:10:35Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integration Strategies Across Enterprise Networks: Applications to Enterprise Architecting with Examples Drawn from the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Enterprise Network
Glazner, Chris
Presentation on integration strategies across enterprise networks
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI Integrated Product Suite</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83211" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83211</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:20Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI Integrated Product Suite
McManus, Hugh
Presentation on the LAI integrated product suite
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integrating the Lean Enterprise: Incorporating LAI Research, Products, and Practice into MIT Curriculum</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83210" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83210</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T03:27:06Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integrating the Lean Enterprise: Incorporating LAI Research, Products, and Practice into MIT Curriculum
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
Presentation on course 16.852J/ESD.61J, Integrating the Lean Enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Leadership for Lean Culture Transformation: Introduction to Breakout Session &amp; Five Precepts for Lean Enterprise Change</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83209" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83209</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T03:27:06Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Leadership for Lean Culture Transformation: Introduction to Breakout Session &amp; Five Precepts for Lean Enterprise Change
Roth, George
Presentation on lean culture transformation and agenda/presentations
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Creating High Performance Extended Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83207" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Stanke, Alexis</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83207</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:19Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Creating High Performance Extended Enterprises
Stanke, Alexis
Presentation on creating high performance extended enterprises
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Alignment for Large Engineering Projects: Architecting Distributed Leadership</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83206" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McKenna, Nick</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83206</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:23:03Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Alignment for Large Engineering Projects: Architecting Distributed Leadership
McKenna, Nick
Presentation on ALIGN process for large engineering projects
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>GLPDS Toolset Development</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83204" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83204</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T11:23:03Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">GLPDS Toolset Development
Rebentisch, Eric
Presentation on GLPDS toolset development
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Platform Issues in Commercial Aircraft Companies</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83203" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bador, Damien</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83203</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:15Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Platform Issues in Commercial Aircraft Companies
Bador, Damien
Presentation on platform issues in commercial aircraft companies Boeing and Airbus
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Platforms, Development and Architecture in the Lean Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83201" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Long, Dave</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83201</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:45:41Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Platforms, Development and Architecture in the Lean Enterprise
Long, Dave
Presentation on platforms in the Lean Enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Managing Risk and Uncertainty: Traditional Methods and the Lean Enterprise</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83200" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Wirthlin, Major Robb</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83200</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T12:09:50Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Managing Risk and Uncertainty: Traditional Methods and the Lean Enterprise
Wirthlin, Major Robb
Agenda/Overview&#13;
Review of Recent LAI research&#13;
• Josef Oehmen&#13;
• Steve Bresnahan&#13;
• McManus/Hastings&#13;
• Research Conclusions/&#13;
My Proposed Research&#13;
• Motivation for study&#13;
• Areas of Interest
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Integrated Concurrent Engineering (ICE): Building Lean Conceptual Design Factories</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83199" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Coffee, Thomas</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83199</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:48:28Z</updated>
<published>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Integrated Concurrent Engineering (ICE): Building Lean Conceptual Design Factories
Coffee, Thomas
Presentation on the ICE approach
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Modeling the Product Development Enterprise Methods, Decisions and Metrics</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83198" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Castro, Joao</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83198</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:33Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Modeling the Product Development Enterprise Methods, Decisions and Metrics
Rupani, Sid; Castro, Joao
Presentation on modeling the product development enterprise
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Corporate Decision Analysis: An Engineering Approach</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83197" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tang, Victor</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83197</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:14Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Corporate Decision Analysis: An Engineering Approach
Tang, Victor
Presentation on using an engineering approach in corporate decision analysis
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Recent LAI PD VSM Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83195" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83195</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:14Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Recent LAI PD VSM Research
Rebentisch, Eric
Overview&#13;
• LAI PDVSM 1.0 released&#13;
• Predecessors in widespread (?) distribution and use (??)&#13;
in the LAI consortium&#13;
• Several recent research projects completed&#13;
using value stream mapping in PD&#13;
• Kato—Waste in PD&#13;
• Whitaker—VSM and EVMS&#13;
• MacKenzie—VSM in USAF SPOs&#13;
• Evidence of significant PDVSM activities&#13;
among LAI consortium members&#13;
• Where do we stand as a learning community?&#13;
• What are the next steps?
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Quantifying the Effects of Waste in a Product Development Process</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83194" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Livengood, Dan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83194</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:19Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Quantifying the Effects of Waste in a Product Development Process
Livengood, Dan
Overview&#13;
•Setting the stage: Sources of waste in Product Development&#13;
•The Main Act: Identifying and measuring waste in typical development processes&#13;
•Finale: Solutions and a real-time metric&#13;
•Encore: Related research paths could spawn from here within our Product Lifecycle research team
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Research Enables Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83192" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Widnall, Dr. Sheila</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83192</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T07:15:56Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Research Enables Enterprise Transformation
Widnall, Dr. Sheila
Presentation on the transformation imperative
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Industry Future State and LAI Executive Panel</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83189" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Cool, Christopher</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83189</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T22:01:33Z</updated>
<published>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Industry Future State and LAI Executive Panel
Cool, Christopher
Presentation on industry future state and LAI
</summary>
<dc:date>2006-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Developing Capabilities for Lean Enterprise Change</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83187" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83187</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:18Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Developing Capabilities for Lean Enterprise Change
Roth, George
Presentation on achieving successful lean enterprise change
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering Handout</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83186" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83186</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:16Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering Handout
Rhodes, Donna
LAI Conference handout, Boston Hyatt Harborside Hotel
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering: Panel on Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83185" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rhodes, Donna</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83185</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:40:11Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering: Panel on Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering
Rhodes, Donna
Lean systems engineering panel
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>INCOSE Lean SE Working Group</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83183" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Prof. Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83183</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:02:18Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">INCOSE Lean SE Working Group
Murman, Prof. Earll
LAI Conference presentation, Boston Hyatt Harborside Hotel
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Making Difficult Conversations Productive: Individual and Organizational Learning Approaches</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83181" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83181</id>
<updated>2019-04-09T16:18:06Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Making Difficult Conversations Productive: Individual and Organizational Learning Approaches
Roth, George
Presentation with exercises to help make organizational change go well
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Computational Enterprise Modeling and Simulation: Enabling Enterprise Performance Improvement, Modernization and Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83180" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Bozdogan, Dr. Kirk</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Glazner, Christopher</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hoffman, Dr. Kenneth</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sussman, Prof. Joseph</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83180</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:48:41Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Computational Enterprise Modeling and Simulation: Enabling Enterprise Performance Improvement, Modernization and Transformation
Bozdogan, Dr. Kirk; Glazner, Christopher; Hoffman, Dr. Kenneth; Sussman, Prof. Joseph
Lean Advancement Initiative Annual Conference presentation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Symbiotic Strategies in Enterprise Ecology: Modeling Commercial Aviation as an Enterprise of Enterprises</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83179" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sgouridis, Prof. Sgouris</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83179</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T13:17:20Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Symbiotic Strategies in Enterprise Ecology: Modeling Commercial Aviation as an Enterprise of Enterprises
Sgouridis, Prof. Sgouris
Agenda: Overview, Motivation, and Methodology, Research Questions&#13;
Modeling Commercial Aviation as an Enterprise of Enterprise, Results and Conclusions, Contributions, Future Work
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Increasing Value of a Family of Products through Flexibility: Hedging Against Uncertainty</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83178" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McConnell, Dr. Joshua</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Sussman, Prof. Joseph</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83178</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T23:14:55Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Increasing Value of a Family of Products through Flexibility: Hedging Against Uncertainty
McConnell, Dr. Joshua; Sussman, Prof. Joseph
LAI Annual Meeting presentation from the session, Pushing the Enterprise Modeling Envelope
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Highlights of Enterprise Transformation Research</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83177" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Debbie</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83177</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:31Z</updated>
<published>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Highlights of Enterprise Transformation Research
Nightingale, Debbie
Highlights of the latest in LAI research supporting enterprise transformation
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-04-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Portfolio Risk Management</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83176" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Vixama, Maj Chez</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83176</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:31Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Portfolio Risk Management
Vixama, Maj Chez
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Baltimore, Maryland
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Culture of Innovation Styles: Are Our Corporate Cultures Tuned for Innovation?</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83175" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Czaika, Ellen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83175</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:30Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Culture of Innovation Styles: Are Our Corporate Cultures Tuned for Innovation?
Czaika, Ellen; Valerdi, Ricardo
Agenda&#13;
•Overview of Hofstede Cross Cultural Dimensions&#13;
•Interactions among the dimensions&#13;
•Miller &amp; Friesen Models of Innovation&#13;
•Brown Systems Model of Innovation&#13;
•Application to Industry&#13;
•Models for Innovation&#13;
•Matching Types to Innovation&#13;
•Next Steps&#13;
•Closing Thoughts
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merging Lean and Six Sigma Programs to Realize Enterprise Excellence</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83174" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, Dr. George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83174</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:47:54Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Merging Lean and Six Sigma Programs to Realize Enterprise Excellence
Roth, Dr. George
LAI Annual Conference presentation, Baltimore, Maryland
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Deploying the LAI Lean Academy at Northeastern University</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83173" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83173</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:47:54Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Deploying the LAI Lean Academy at Northeastern University
McManus, Hugh
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Baltimore, Maryland
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The LAI EdNet's Journey into Lean Healthcare</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83172" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Prof. Emeritus Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83172</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:30Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The LAI EdNet's Journey into Lean Healthcare
Murman, Prof. Emeritus Earll
Agenda: Education Network Overview, LAI Lean Academy Course, LAI Lean Healthcare Academy Course
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Enterprise Systems Approach to Healthcare</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83171" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83171</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:28Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Enterprise Systems Approach to Healthcare
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
Agenda&#13;
• Research Motivation&#13;
• Cross-Industry Enterprise Challenges&#13;
• Boston Provider Case Examples&#13;
• LAI Enterprise Healthcare Vision
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Annual Meeting Opening: Achieving Enterprise Excellence</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83170" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83170</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T10:58:01Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Annual Meeting Opening: Achieving Enterprise Excellence
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Baltimore, Maryland
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Assessment Diagnostics: Lessons Learned from LAI Members</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83169" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shields, Tom</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Valerdi, Ricardo</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83169</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:46:34Z</updated>
<published>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Assessment Diagnostics: Lessons Learned from LAI Members
Shields, Tom; Valerdi, Ricardo
Discussion facilitated by Tom Shields and Ricardo Valerdi
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Paradox of Leading from the Middle</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83168" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Roth, Dr. George</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83168</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Paradox of Leading from the Middle
Roth, Dr. George
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Break Out Sessions 1 &amp; 2, Dana Point, California
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Simulating the Patient Value Stream</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83167" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>McManus, Hugh</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83167</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T04:04:30Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Simulating the Patient Value Stream
McManus, Hugh
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Dana Point, California
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Lean Implementation at Jefferson Healthcare</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83166" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Murman, Earll</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83166</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:51:04Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Lean Implementation at Jefferson Healthcare
Murman, Earll
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Dana Point, California
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Applying ESAT to a Multi-campus Mental Health Hospital</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83165" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Peck, Jordan</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83165</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Applying ESAT to a Multi-campus Mental Health Hospital
Peck, Jordan
Agenda: Project Overview, Enterprise Description, X-Matrix, Process Waste
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Standardization of Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83164" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rupani, Sid</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83164</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Standardization of Product Development Processes in Multi-Project Organizations
Rupani, Sid
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Dana Point, California
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Key Enablers to a Lean Enterprise Journey</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83163" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Carroll, Prof. John</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83163</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:51:04Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Key Enablers to a Lean Enterprise Journey
Carroll, Prof. John
Presentation on conference highlights, consortium views, and upcoming events
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Leading Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83162" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Nightingale, Prof. Deborah</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83162</id>
<updated>2019-04-11T11:14:03Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Leading Enterprise Transformation
Nightingale, Prof. Deborah
LAI Annual Meeting presentation, Dana Point, California
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LAI Working With the US Army for Enterprise Transformation</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83161" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rebentisch, Dr. Eric</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83161</id>
<updated>2019-04-10T08:44:29Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LAI Working With the US Army for Enterprise Transformation
Rebentisch, Dr. Eric
Overview&#13;
• Eric Rebentisch: LAI/Army ESAT overview (Army&#13;
Materiel Enterprise, System of Systems&#13;
Engineering), reflections on the ESAT process&#13;
• Nancy Moulton: Army Materiel Enterprise (ME)&#13;
reflections on the experience, on-going efforts&#13;
and progress&#13;
• Jerry Coover: Implementation efforts and change&#13;
dynamics, other enterprise perspectives&#13;
• Panel discussion and Q&amp;A
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation Primer</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83160" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Srinivasan, Dr. Jayakanth</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83160</id>
<updated>2019-04-12T20:51:04Z</updated>
<published>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Enterprise Strategic Analysis for Transformation Primer
Srinivasan, Dr. Jayakanth
Outline&#13;
• Understanding the ESAT Context&#13;
• From Lean Now! → EVSMA → ESAT&#13;
• Key elements of ESAT&#13;
• Executing an ESAT&#13;
• Discussion Panel
</summary>
<dc:date>2010-03-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
