Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurek, Jasmina
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T14:49:33Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T14:49:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/130018
dc.description.abstractPassive house (PH) and zero-energy building (ZEB) standards aim to reduce the energy consumption and carbon footprints of buildings. The PH concept implies a low energy consumption achieved through passive technology such as insulation and energy-efficient HVAC systems. A ZEB is an energy-efficient building that gen­erates enough renewable energy to offset or even exceed the energy it consumes from the grid. Previous research has shown higher embodied energy and costs for PH and ZEB compared to conventional buildings. To date, very few projects have shown that a PH could be done within a budget comparable to similar standard homes, which calls into question the economic viability of PH. However, most analyses were done using comparisons of individual designs for specific scenarios, making it difficult to draw broad conclusions. We conducted an analysis comparing a wide range of conventional, PH, and ZEB designs in order to have a better understanding of the economic and environmental trade-offs of these strategies.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT CSHub Research Brief; Volume 2020, Issue 3en_US
dc.subjectPassive Houseen_US
dc.subjectBuilding Energy Consumptionen_US
dc.subjectNet-zero Buildingsen_US
dc.titleResearch Brief: Can Passive House and Zero-energy Building Standards Promise a Low-carbon Future?en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record