Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBillio, Monica
dc.contributor.authorGetmansky, Mila
dc.contributor.authorLo, Andrew W.
dc.contributor.authorPelizzon, Loriana
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T17:35:30Z
dc.date.available2011-10-28T17:35:30Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/66679
dc.description.abstractA significant contributing factor to the Financial Crisis of 2007–2009 was the apparent interconnectedness among hedge funds, banks, brokers, and insurance companies, which amplified shocks into systemic events. In this paper, we propose five measures of systemic risk based on statistical relations among the market returns of these four types of financial institutions. Using correlations, cross-autocorrelations, principal components analysis, regime-switching models, and Granger causality tests, we find that all four sectors have become highly interrelated and less liquid over the past decade, increasing the level of systemic risk in the finance and insurance industries. These measures can also identify and quantify financial crisis periods. Our results suggest that while hedge funds can provide early indications of market dislocation, their contributions to systemic risk may not be as significant as those of banks, insurance companies, and brokers who take on risks more appropriate for hedge funds.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge, MA; Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4774-10
dc.subjectFinancial Crisesen_US
dc.subjectLiquidityen_US
dc.subjectFinancial Institutionsen_US
dc.subjectSystemic Risken_US
dc.titleMeasuring Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectorsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record