Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Wesley
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Spencer
dc.date.accessioned2002-06-11T19:56:20Z
dc.date.available2002-06-11T19:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/723
dc.description.abstractThe US Air Force (USAF) has evolved a policy for the acquisition of fighter jet engines (FJE). In the 1970s and 1980s that policy placed a premium on FJE performance primarily measured by the metric: thrust/engine weight. In the 1990s, the USAF policy changed from an emphasis on performance to reduced life-cycle cost with a premium on sustainment. This paper reports the results of a study of how the USAF and Corporation Alpha (Alpha) have adapted their processes, practices, and policies to design, develop, manufacture, test, and sustain a family of FJEs. Each member of the family of FJEs is sequentially linked relative to insertion of technology designed to reduce sustainment costs. In addition to the technology linkages, the development of the family of FJEs selected for this case study is also tracked relative to US Department of Defense and USAF policy and industry design, build, and maintain processes, methods, and tools. This paper discerns the complex, highly integrated manner that characterizes the interaction between (1) technology, (2) policy, and (3) manufacturing and sustainment tools to produce a family of FJEs with improving sustainment qualities and non-degrading performance. The metric Unscheduled Engine Removals (UER) per 1000 Effective Flight Hours (UER/1000EFH) is used to compare the sustainability of each member of the selected family of FJEs. Our results are based on data obtained through a series of field interviews of USAF and civilian government personnel and Alpha personnel. The US government extensive database containing UER information is the primary source of MRO trends for the FJEs of this study. Our analysis shows that the family of FJEs sustainability, as measured by the UER metric, has not improved beyond 6 10 EFH for each succeeding generation in the selected FJE family. We conjecture that upstream policy, technology insertion, and manufacturing and sustainment tools are not the primary determinants of sustainability; the manner in which the FJE is used has the greatest influence on sustainability of FJEs.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSociety of Automotive Engineers Lean Sustainment Initiativeen
dc.format.extent87170 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectcorporation alphaen
dc.subjectsustainabilityen
dc.subjectfighter jet enginesen
dc.subjectSociety of Automotive Engineersen
dc.subjectunscheduled engine removalsen
dc.subjectUS Air Forceen
dc.titleSustainment Measures for Fighter Jet Enginesen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Lean Sustainment Initiative
    U.S. Air Force-industry-MIT research on applying lean principles to the maintenance, repair, and overhaul of defense aircraft

Show simple item record