Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNordbotten, Jan M.
dc.contributor.authorFernø, Martin
dc.contributor.authorFlemisch, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorJuanes, Ruben
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-17T14:38:47Z
dc.date.available2025-06-17T14:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/159426
dc.description.abstractThe original idea of constructing the FluidFlower was to construct an experimental laboratory that was well suited to both scientific research and public outreach. Indeed, a core principle was to allow for demonstrating the key physical mechanisms underpinning geological CO2 storage to the public in what can be perceived as a realistic setting. This motivated the design of a relatively large experiment (about 3 by 2 m), with a transparent glass plate, and where pH sensitive dye was used to mark the CO2 concentration in the water phase. With these dimensions, some geological complexity could be included in the experiment, and the use of high-permeable unconsolidated sands reduced the timescales to hours and days, as opposed to the years and centuries of relevance at field conditions. The science part of the FluidFlower study was facilitated by the serendipitous arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic. We realized that the construction of the FluidFlower was at a scale and purpose which was quite unique, and that the travel restrictions imposed by Covid-19 allowed us to limit the insight non-local scientists would have in the experiments we conducted. This motivated the design of, and call for participation in, a forecasting study during spring 2021—and to our great fortune, good colleagues from around the globe agreed to participate. The main part of the study took place from early fall 2021 through April 2022, and during this process, it quickly became clear that there was much more to be said about this study than what could fit within a single paper. The idea for creating the special issue you are now reading was thus formed.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-024-02067-yen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.titleFluidFlower: A Meter-Scale Experimental Laboratory for Geological CO2 Storageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNordbotten, J.M., Fernø, M., Flemisch, B. et al. FluidFlower: A Meter-Scale Experimental Laboratory for Geological CO2 Storage. Transp Porous Med 151, 859–863 (2024).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalTransport in Porous Mediaen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-03-27T13:47:59Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
dspace.embargo.termsY
dspace.date.submission2025-03-27T13:47:59Z
mit.journal.volume151en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record