Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGhosn, Rania
dc.contributor.authorVronskaya, Alla
dc.contributor.authorJia, Ruo
dc.contributor.authorPohl, Ethel Baraona
dc.contributor.authorDharia, Namita Vijay
dc.contributor.authorAidoo, Fallon Samuels
dc.contributor.authorWolff, Ilze
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-18T18:09:59Z
dc.date.available2025-12-18T18:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-02
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164406
dc.description.abstractIn the conclusion to her book The Birth of Energy: Fossil Fuels, Thermodynamics, and the Politics of Work, political scientist Cara Daggett considers “A Post-Work Energy Politics” in which she examines the historical coupling of energy and work—meaning human, waged work—in an invitation to disassociate their values and futures. The exponential power of fossil fuels animated the pipedream that powerful, inorganic slaves could substitute unfree human labor, ideas that have driven European imperialism. Fossil fuel systems did not lead, however, to a world beyond work. Rather, today’s “patriarchal slave states” continue to manage the project of putting the world to work through the maximization of productivity, and the subordination of racialized, immigrant, and gendered bodies—who would work for lower, or for no, wages. “The project of work,” Daggett argues, “is in tension with the project of life.” 1 And the rise of “work–life balance” is a mere tactic of governance in which the enemy is fatigue, exhaustion, and burn-out. She suggests, in turn, an alliance between post-carbon and feminist post-work politics and asks: what might it mean for energy politics to refer to the politics of ensuring public vitality? In order to advance a feminist revaluation of work, Daggett draws on Kathi Weeks’s The Problem with Work to outline a project that makes two utopian demands. One demand articulates a paradoxical relationship between the pragmatism of (present) demands and the speculative seeds of possibility; a second demand outlines a utopian form for such politics: partial, fragmented kin to the genre of the manifesto. Daggett concludes with an invitation that “a radical planet politics, if it seeks to contest ecomodernist claims, needs its own politics of pleasure.” 2 In an echo to Daggett’s invitation, the authors of this Educators’ Roundtable were invited to contribute a short text that picks up on the possibilities of a post-carbon, post-work politics.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2024.2382059en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativesen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleThe Afterlife of Energy: Post-carbon and Feminist Post-work Politicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGhosn, R., Vronskaya, A., Jia, R., Pohl, E. B., Dharia, N. V., Aidoo, F. S., … Wolff, I. (2024). The Afterlife of Energy: Post-carbon and Feminist Post-work Politics. Journal of Architectural Education, 78(2), 638–648.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Architectural Educationen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-12-18T17:57:44Z
dspace.orderedauthorsGhosn, R; Vronskaya, A; Jia, R; Pohl, EB; Dharia, NV; Aidoo, FS; Wolff, Ien_US
dspace.date.submission2025-12-18T17:57:46Z
mit.journal.volume78en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record