Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNakayama, Luis Filipe
dc.contributor.authorZago Ribeiro, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorNovaes, Frederico
dc.contributor.authorMiyawaki, Isabele Ayumi
dc.contributor.authorMiyawaki, Andresa Emy
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Juliana Angélica Estevão
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Talita
dc.contributor.authorMalerbi, Fernando Korn
dc.contributor.authorRegatieri, Caio Vinicius Saito
dc.contributor.authorCeli, Leo Anthony
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Paolo S
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T17:37:18Z
dc.date.available2025-12-10T17:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164274
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This study aims to compare artificial intelligence (AI) systems applied in diabetic retinopathy (DR) teleophthalmology screening, currently deployed systems, fairness initiatives and the challenges for implementation. METHODS: The review included articles retrieved from PubMed/Medline/EMBASE literature search strategy regarding telemedicine, DR and AI. The screening criteria included human articles in English, Portuguese or Spanish and related to telemedicine and AI for DR screening. The author's affiliations and the study's population income group were classified according to the World Bank Country and Lending Groups. RESULTS: The literature search yielded a total of 132 articles, and nine were included after full-text assessment. The selected articles were published between 2004 and 2020 and were grouped as telemedicine systems, algorithms, economic analysis and image quality assessment. Four telemedicine systems that perform a quality assessment, image preprocessing and pathological screening were reviewed. A data and post-deployment bias assessment are not performed in any of the algorithms, and none of the studies evaluate the social impact implementations. There is a lack of representativeness in the reviewed articles, with most authors and target populations from high-income countries and no low-income country representation. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine and AI hold great promise for augmenting decision-making in medical care, expanding patient access and enhancing cost-effectiveness. Economic studies and social science analysis are crucial to support the implementation of AI in teleophthalmology screening programs. Promoting fairness and generalizability in automated systems combined with telemedicine screening programs is not straightforward. Improving data representativeness, reducing biases and promoting equity in deployment and post-deployment studies are all critical steps in model development.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2258149en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleArtificial intelligence for telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening: a reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationNakayama, L. F., Zago Ribeiro, L., Novaes, F., Miyawaki, I. A., Miyawaki, A. E., de Oliveira, J. A. E., … Silva, P. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence for telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening: a review. Annals of Medicine, 55(2).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute for Medical Engineering and Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalAnnals of Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-12-10T17:27:52Z
dspace.orderedauthorsNakayama, LF; Zago Ribeiro, L; Novaes, F; Miyawaki, IA; Miyawaki, AE; de Oliveira, JAE; Oliveira, T; Malerbi, FK; Regatieri, CVS; Celi, LA; Silva, PSen_US
dspace.date.submission2025-12-10T17:27:53Z
mit.journal.volume55en_US
mit.journal.issue2en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record