MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Bias Delayed is Bias Denied? Assessing the Effect of Reporting Delays on Disparity Assessments

Author(s)
Gosciak, Jennah; Balagopalan, Aparna; Ouyang, Derek; Koenecke, Allison; Ghassemi, Marzyeh; Ho, Daniel; ... Show more Show less
Thumbnail
Download3715275.3732123.pdf (2.823Mb)
Publisher with Creative Commons License

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Prior work has documented widespread racial and ethnic inequities across sectors, such as healthcare, finance, and technology. Across all of these domains, conducting disparity assessments at regular time intervals is critical for surfacing potential biases in decision-making and improving outcomes across demographic groups. Because disparity assessments fundamentally depend on the availability of demographic information, their efficacy is limited by the availability and consistency of available demographic identifiers. While prior work has considered the impact of missing data on fairness, little attention has been paid to the role of delayed demographic data. Delayed data, while eventually observed, might be missing at the critical point of monitoring and action – and delays may be unequally distributed across groups in ways that distort disparity assessments. We characterize such impacts in healthcare, using electronic health records of over 5M patients across primary care practices in all 50 states. Our contributions are threefold. First, we document the high rate of race and ethnicity reporting delays in a healthcare setting and demonstrate widespread variation in rates at which demographics are reported across different groups. Second, through a set of retrospective analyses using real data, we find that such delays impact disparity assessments and hence conclusions made across a range of consequential healthcare outcomes, particularly at more granular levels of state-level and practice-level assessments. Third, we find limited ability of conventional methods that impute missing race in mitigating the effects of reporting delays on the accuracy of timely disparity assessments. Our insights and methods generalize to many domains of algorithmic fairness where delays in the availability of sensitive information may confound audits, thus deserving closer attention within a pipeline-aware machine learning framework.
Description
FAccT ’25, Athens, Greece
Date issued
2025-06-23
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164286
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Publisher
ACM|The 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
Citation
Jennah Gosciak, Aparna Balagopalan, Derek Ouyang, Allison Koenecke, Marzyeh Ghassemi, and Daniel E. Ho. 2025. Bias Delayed is Bias Denied? Assessing the Effect of Reporting Delays on Disparity Assessments. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1843–1861.
Version: Final published version
ISBN
979-8-4007-1482-5

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.