Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGosciak, Jennah
dc.contributor.authorBalagopalan, Aparna
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Derek
dc.contributor.authorKoenecke, Allison
dc.contributor.authorGhassemi, Marzyeh
dc.contributor.authorHo, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T22:04:16Z
dc.date.available2025-12-11T22:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-23
dc.identifier.isbn979-8-4007-1482-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/164286
dc.descriptionFAccT ’25, Athens, Greeceen_US
dc.description.abstractPrior work has documented widespread racial and ethnic inequities across sectors, such as healthcare, finance, and technology. Across all of these domains, conducting disparity assessments at regular time intervals is critical for surfacing potential biases in decision-making and improving outcomes across demographic groups. Because disparity assessments fundamentally depend on the availability of demographic information, their efficacy is limited by the availability and consistency of available demographic identifiers. While prior work has considered the impact of missing data on fairness, little attention has been paid to the role of delayed demographic data. Delayed data, while eventually observed, might be missing at the critical point of monitoring and action – and delays may be unequally distributed across groups in ways that distort disparity assessments. We characterize such impacts in healthcare, using electronic health records of over 5M patients across primary care practices in all 50 states. Our contributions are threefold. First, we document the high rate of race and ethnicity reporting delays in a healthcare setting and demonstrate widespread variation in rates at which demographics are reported across different groups. Second, through a set of retrospective analyses using real data, we find that such delays impact disparity assessments and hence conclusions made across a range of consequential healthcare outcomes, particularly at more granular levels of state-level and practice-level assessments. Third, we find limited ability of conventional methods that impute missing race in mitigating the effects of reporting delays on the accuracy of timely disparity assessments. Our insights and methods generalize to many domains of algorithmic fairness where delays in the availability of sensitive information may confound audits, thus deserving closer attention within a pipeline-aware machine learning framework.en_US
dc.publisherACM|The 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparencyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3715275.3732123en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceAssociation for Computing Machineryen_US
dc.titleBias Delayed is Bias Denied? Assessing the Effect of Reporting Delays on Disparity Assessmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJennah Gosciak, Aparna Balagopalan, Derek Ouyang, Allison Koenecke, Marzyeh Ghassemi, and Daniel E. Ho. 2025. Bias Delayed is Bias Denied? Assessing the Effect of Reporting Delays on Disparity Assessments. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1843–1861.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_POLICY
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-08-01T08:35:12Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe author(s)
dspace.date.submission2025-08-01T08:35:12Z
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record